Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

LivinIsto CZ — home watch

REMOTE · WWW.LIVINISTO.CZ

Watches Czech home listings for a buyer. Takes no contact; active only after e-mail opt-in.

Available components

+3 this week 72 Trust /100

Last scanned (6 hours ago)

Scores higher than 58% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category E-commerce

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability68
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1284 tokens (~256/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management50
  • Stability observed for 15 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (80% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • All 2 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (13)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool coverage: 100% → 80% ▼ functional
    • Schema quality: 1003 → 1284 ▼ functional
    • New tool “intent_search_offers” functional
  • 26 Oct 26 +1
    • “intent_publish_intent” added an optional parameter “lang” cosmetic

    1 cosmetic change on this day. Switch on “Show cosmetic changes” to see it.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “intent_list_matches” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “intent_publish_intent” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
  • 22 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 21 Oct 26 66

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.livinisto.cz/mcp/zamery

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=livinisto.cz CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 9 Sept 2026 8 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 d0bb9703a127309c1337b50040b04f51
SANs: livinisto.cz, *.livinisto.cz
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of www.livinisto.cz. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
cz. DS published 20237 13 Verified
livinisto.cz. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=15552000
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'nonce-ODFiNDI1NTktNDZlMy00ZTFkLWI5MzMtOWM0ZTUxZDFkN2Ew' 'strict-dynamic'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: https://*.sdn.cz https://*.bazos.cz https://*.bezrealitky.cz; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self'; manifest-src 'self'; worker-src 'self'; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'; upgrade-insecure-requests;
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(self), geolocation=(), payment=(), usb=(), magnetometer=(), gyroscope=(), accelerometer=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://www.livinisto.cz/mcp/zamery Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://www.livinisto.cz/mcp/zamery HTTPS enforced 301 https://www.livinisto.cz/mcp/zamery
MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~1,039 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
intent_get_intent ~82

Use this to check whether an intent created with intent_publish_intent is already confirmed by the user and active, waiting, expired or withdrawn. Requires the intentCode; returns the statement and dates only — never the user's e-mail, the hidden limit or any other personal data.

NameTypeReqDescription
intentCodestringyesThe intentCode returned by intent_publish_intent.
NameTypeReqDescription
activeSincestring|null––
buyBystring|null––
foundbooleanyes–
hasHiddenLimitboolean––
niceToHavestring|null––
statementstring––
statusstring–awaiting_consent = the user has not confirmed on the LivinIsto page yet; awaiting_email_confirmation = the user filled in the page and must click the link in the e-mail; active = LivinIsto is watchin…
validUntilstring–Date (YYYY-MM-DD) until which the intent is watched (before confirmation: until the draft is deleted).

No examples provided.

intent_list_matches ~182

Use this when the user asks what LivinIsto has found for an intent created with intent_publish_intent. These are the same homes LivinIsto e-mails to the user; this server cannot send messages into the conversation by itself. Requires the intentCode; optional since (ISO time) returns only newer matches. Returns at most 20 newest matches with the asking price and LivinIsto price verdict at the time of the match and a link. Before the user confirms the intent there are no matches. Matches come from listings LivinIsto aggregates from the market, so they cover only homes listed on LivinIsto and may be incomplete; a home may already be sold or rented.

NameTypeReqDescription
intentCodestringyesThe intentCode returned by intent_publish_intent.
sincestring–Only matches found after this ISO time.
NameTypeReqDescription
foundbooleanyes–
matchesarray––
moreboolean–More matches exist than returned; call again with since.
statusstring–awaiting_consent = the user has not confirmed on the LivinIsto page yet; awaiting_email_confirmation = the user filled in the page and must click the link in the e-mail; active = LivinIsto is watchin…

No examples provided.

intent_publish_intent ~458

Use this when the user asks LivinIsto to keep watching Czech property listings (flats, houses, cottages, building plots; sale or rent) for them over time (e.g. "let me know until March about a 2+kk flat in Brno under 5 million CZK"). This does NOT start watching by itself and takes no e-mail address or other personal data: it returns a consentUrl on www.livinisto.cz that the user must open themselves, enter their own e-mail there and confirm by clicking the link LivinIsto e-mails them. Never ask the user for their e-mail in the conversation and never open the link for them. An unconfirmed draft is deleted after 24 hours. Matching homes are e-mailed to the user and can also be read with intent_list_matches using the returned intentCode — keep it in the conversation. hiddenLimitCzk is optional: the most the user would pay in CZK (monthly for rent), stored encrypted and never shown to sellers or returned by any tool; pass it only if the user said it. Matches come from listings LivinIsto aggregates from the Czech market (its own listings and public listings from Czech property portals), so they cover only homes listed on LivinIsto (Czech Republic, prices in CZK) and may be incomplete; no commercial property and nothing abroad.

NameTypeReqDescription
buyBystring–Date (YYYY-MM-DD) by which the user wants to buy or rent; watching stops after it.
hiddenLimitCzkinteger–Optional private maximum price in CZK (monthly for rent); encrypted on receipt and never returned by any tool.
langstring–Optional language of the replies (texts only; codes, URLs and statuses never change). By default the language of the statement.
niceToHavestring–Wishes that are not required (never filters), e.g. "balkon, výtah".
statementstringyesWhat the home MUST be, as one short Czech phrase, e.g. "byt 2+kk Brno do 5 milionů" or "pronájem 1+kk Praha do 18000".
NameTypeReqDescription
buyBystring|nullyes–
consentExpiresAtstringyesISO time after which the unconfirmed draft is deleted.
consentUrlstringyesPage on www.livinisto.cz where the USER confirms the intent with their own e-mail. Show it unchanged.
hasHiddenLimitbooleanyesWhether a hidden limit was stored. Its value is never returned.
intentCodestringyesSecret code of this intent; use it with intent_get_intent, intent_list_matches and intent_withdraw_intent.
niceToHavestring|nullyes–
notUnderstoodarrayyesWords of the statement that are NOT watched for as a filter. Tell the person.
statementstringyes–
statusstringyesawaiting_consent = the user has not confirmed on the LivinIsto page yet; awaiting_email_confirmation = the user filled in the page and must click the link in the e-mail; active = LivinIsto is watchin…
understoodarrayyesWhat LivinIsto will watch for, read from the statement (in Czech). Tell the person before they confirm.

No examples provided.

intent_search_offers ~248

Use this when the user wants to find a flat, house, cottage or plot for sale or rent in the Czech Republic now. Pass what they are looking for as one short phrase (Czech works best), e.g. "byt 2+kk Brno do 6 milionů". Returns up to 20 homes from LivinIsto's offer in LivinIsto's own order, each with a link to the home on www.livinisto.cz, plus what was understood, which words were not applied and what had to be relaxed. For rent the price is per month. When suggestIntent is true (nothing or little found, or part of the phrase was dropped), offer the user intent_publish_intent with the same statement so LivinIsto keeps watching. Results come from listings LivinIsto aggregates from the Czech market and may be incomplete; no seller or agent contact is returned.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger–At most this many homes (default 10; LivinIsto returns at most 10).
statementstringyesWhat the user is looking for, e.g. "dům Plzeň do 8 milionů".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

intent_withdraw_intent ~69

Use this when the user wants LivinIsto to stop watching for an intent created with intent_publish_intent. Takes effect immediately; nothing more is e-mailed for it. Requires the intentCode.

NameTypeReqDescription
intentCodestringyesThe intentCode returned by intent_publish_intent.
NameTypeReqDescription
foundbooleanyes–
statusstring––

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the LivinIsto CZ — home watch MCP server?

LivinIsto CZ — home watch is a hosted endpoint at https://www.livinisto.cz/mcp/zamery, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · www.livinisto.cz

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http cz-livinisto-intents 'https://www.livinisto.cz/mcp/zamery'
Common questions

What is the LivinIsto CZ — home watch MCP server?

LivinIsto CZ — home watch is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as cz.livinisto/intents. Watches Czech home listings for a buyer. Takes no contact; active only after e-mail opt-in. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.livinisto.cz/mcp/zamery).

Is the LivinIsto CZ — home watch MCP server safe to use?

LivinIsto CZ — home watch scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the LivinIsto CZ — home watch MCP server expose?

LivinIsto CZ — home watch exposes 5 tools: intent_publish_intent, intent_get_intent, intent_list_matches, intent_withdraw_intent, intent_search_offers. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,039 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the LivinIsto CZ — home watch MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to LivinIsto CZ — home watch without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the LivinIsto CZ — home watch MCP server still maintained?

LivinIsto CZ — home watch is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the LivinIsto CZ — home watch MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on LivinIsto CZ — home watch, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.