Untapped Agency Compare
MCPB · UNTAPPED-AGENCY-COMPARE-MCP-0.4.0.MCPB
Compare agency services and terms with sources
Available components
Last scanned (9 hours ago)
Scores higher than 71% of MCPB servers
Category CRM and Sales
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security0
- No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
- Known CVEs could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).Unverified
- Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
- Dependency health could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).Unverified
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 12 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 256 tokens (~64/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage83
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 50% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Unverified: 2 categories
Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
Checks we ran (11)
- Source repository
- Provenance
- License
- Maintenance
- Security disclosure
- Schema quality
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Checks we could not complete (5)
These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.
- Malware scan in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.
- Known CVEs in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Known CVEs could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).
- Install scripts in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Install-script risk not yet assessed.
- Dependency health in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Dependency health could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).
- Stability in Stability & Change Management (scores 0 for this)Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).
Does not apply to this package (2)
- Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
- Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 23 Oct 26 36
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed mcpb/https://github.com/CTF-Max/untapped-plugins/releases/download/v0.4.0/untapped-agency-compare-mcp-0.4.0.mcpb@0.4.0
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | mcpb |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare ~86
Compare sourced agency facts as Markdown, CSV and self-contained HTML. Always includes the maker under identical criteria, alphabetical columns, questions for missing facts, and no overall score.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agencies_json | – | yes | List or JSON list of {name, facts}; facts are the extract_offer facts mapping, merged by criterion across supplied pages. |
| priorities | array | – | Criterion IDs to show first; never weights. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
criteria ~22
Show the shared criteria, definitions and missing-fact questions before comparing agencies.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
extract_offer ~77
Extract exact-quote candidates per criterion, with source and date. Missing evidence is not stated; reviews contain only rating and count. Check context before comparing.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| date_read | string | – | Original read date YYYY-MM-DD; defaults to today for material read now. |
| page_text | string | yes | – |
| source_url | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
read_agency_page ~71
Read one owner-supplied HTTPS page or pasted text. No crawling; 20 second timeout, 2 MiB limit, at most three same-host redirects.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| source_url | string | – | Original page URL for pasted text. |
| text | string | – | – |
| url | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Untapped Agency Compare MCP server?
Untapped Agency Compare ships as an MCPB bundle, a single file you download and open in an MCP host that supports MCPB bundles, such as Claude Desktop. The host reads the launch command from the bundle's own manifest, so there is no command to copy. Before opening it, check the file's SHA-256 matches the one the MCP registry declares for it, 605bcd394566b730f06adc4e6adfbc1344603d80f43cae7b126afa7803f5e8f8; the commands to do that are on this page. If it does not match, do not open it.
mcpb · untapped-agency-compare-mcp-0.4.0.mcpb
Download bundleCheck the download matches the SHA-256 the MCP registry declares before you open it. If it does not match, do not open the file.
SHA-256
605bcd394566b730f06adc4e6adfbc1344603d80f43cae7b126afa7803f5e8f8
macOS / Linux
echo "605bcd394566b730f06adc4e6adfbc1344603d80f43cae7b126afa7803f5e8f8 untapped-agency-compare-mcp-0.4.0.mcpb" | shasum -a 256 -c
Windows (PowerShell)
(Get-FileHash -Algorithm SHA256 .\untapped-agency-compare-mcp-0.4.0.mcpb).Hash -eq "605bcd394566b730f06adc4e6adfbc1344603d80f43cae7b126afa7803f5e8f8"
Run it in the folder you saved the bundle to, then open the file with an MCPB-capable host such as Claude Desktop.
What is the Untapped Agency Compare MCP server?
Untapped Agency Compare is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.CTF-Max/untapped-agency-compare. Compare agency services and terms with sources. This page covers its MCPB bundle (https://github.com/CTF-Max/untapped-plugins/releases/download/v0.4.0/untapped-agency-compare-mcp-0.4.0.mcpb).
Is the Untapped Agency Compare MCP server safe to use?
Untapped Agency Compare scores 36 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Untapped Agency Compare MCP server expose?
Untapped Agency Compare exposes 4 tools: read_agency_page, extract_offer, compare, criteria. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 256 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
What licence is the Untapped Agency Compare MCP server under?
Untapped Agency Compare declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Untapped Agency Compare MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 11 checks on Untapped Agency Compare, covering Source repository, Provenance, License, Maintenance and 7 more. 5 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Untapped Agency Compare: Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 1 more. 2 categories score 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an MCPB bundle, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.