io.github.ContentWriterco/leki-mcp
NPM · LEKI-MCP · 2 COMPONENTS
Polish medicines: refunded drug prices, patient co-payment and cheaper substitutes
Available components
Last scanned (9 hours ago)
Scores higher than 47% of npm servers
Category Health and Science
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security81
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects zod 3.25.76, a direct dependency. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 30 of 93 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency97
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to ContentWriterco/leki-mcp). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 1 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 488 tokens (~162/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage93
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 80% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 24 Oct 26 −5
- CVE-2023-54404 affects this package: high ▼ security
- Known CVEs: pass → fail ▼ security
- 23 Oct 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 22 Oct 26 63
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 24 Oct 2026 · Analysed npm/leki-mcp@0.1.1
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | ContentWriterco/leki-mcp |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/ContentWriterco/leki-mcp/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/tags/v0.1.1 |
| Rekor log index | 3399870439 |
| Predicate type | SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha512:b77443451a481a3f2e022485a247442b843467035f307e742754a7b3fd16c425134dd93e3e6b6d86670c685092df3ea3ce1eb20071a929dd80cf00fcd |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Vulnerabilities 1 finding
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5 | CVE-2023-54404 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →
Dependencies 93 packages
| Packages resolved | 93 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 30 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
data_sources Data sources ~22
Where the data comes from, how current it is, caveats.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
drug_info Medicine registration data (Poland) ~87
Data from the Polish Medicinal Products Register: substance, strength, form, ATC, marketing authorisation holder, prescription status (OTC / Rp / Rpz / Rpw / Lz), registered packs with EAN and links to the patient leaflet and SmPC.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| max | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | Drug name, substance or EAN/GTIN |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
drug_price Refunded drug price, co-payment and cheaper substitutes (Poland) ~178
Official pharmacy price, NFZ refund limit, refund level and patient co-payment of a medicine on the Polish refund list, with cheaper equivalents (same substance, strength and pack size) and the cheapest price per tablet. Also tells if the pack is free for seniors 65+, children under 18 or pregnant women. query: brand + strength ("Tulip 20 mg"), substance ("atorwastatyna 20 mg" / "atorvastatinum"), pack size ("30 szt") or EAN/GTIN.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| indication | string | – | Disease or indication, when refund depends on it (e.g. 'cukrzyca') |
| max | integer | – | How many substitutes to list (default 5) |
| query | string | yes | Drug name / substance with optional strength and pack size, or EAN/GTIN |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the io.github.ContentWriterco/leki-mcp server?
io.github.ContentWriterco/leki-mcp runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y leki-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · leki-mcp
claude mcp add contentwriterco-leki-mcp -- npx -y leki-mcp
What is the io.github.ContentWriterco/leki-mcp server?
io.github.ContentWriterco/leki-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.ContentWriterco/leki-mcp. Polish medicines: refunded drug prices, patient co-payment and cheaper substitutes. This page covers its npm package (leki-mcp).
Is the io.github.ContentWriterco/leki-mcp server safe to use?
io.github.ContentWriterco/leki-mcp scores 73 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 1 known advisory against it as of 24 October 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.ContentWriterco/leki-mcp server expose?
io.github.ContentWriterco/leki-mcp exposes 3 tools: drug_price, drug_info, data_sources. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 287 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.ContentWriterco/leki-mcp server still maintained?
io.github.ContentWriterco/leki-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.ContentWriterco/leki-mcp server under?
io.github.ContentWriterco/leki-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.