Sophon Consulting
REMOTE · WWW.SOPHON.CONSULTING · SCANNED AUG 3
Read-only, deterministic AI triage and readiness tools implementing Sophon's published rubrics.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score →
Endpoint Security66
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 2 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability77
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1449 tokens (~144/item across 10 items; 2 tools + 8 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management27
- Stability observed for 8 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage97
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 92% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Add this component to your MCP client. Where a client-specific snippet is available, pick your client below and copy it straight into your config; otherwise use the connection detail shown.
remote · www.sophon.consulting
claude mcp add --transport http consulting-sophon-sophon-consulting https://www.sophon.consulting/api/mcp
[mcp_servers.consulting-sophon-sophon-consulting] url = "https://www.sophon.consulting/api/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"consulting-sophon-sophon-consulting": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://www.sophon.consulting/api/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add consulting-sophon-sophon-consulting --url https://www.sophon.consulting/api/mcp --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
consulting-sophon-sophon-consulting:
url: "https://www.sophon.consulting/api/mcp" {
"mcpServers": {
"consulting-sophon-sophon-consulting": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://www.sophon.consulting/api/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 3 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Jul 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 30 Jul 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 28 Jul 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Jul 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 26 Jul 26 65
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 3 Aug 2026 · Probed https://www.sophon.consulting/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=www.sophon.consulting | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 28 Jul 2026 | 26 Oct 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 5750a8f745815fcd400e78fb31c1c8e8319 |
| SANs: www.sophon.consulting | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
DNSSEC secure
Validation of www.sophon.consulting. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| consulting. | present | 62590 | 8 | Verified |
| sophon.consulting. | present | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| www.sophon.consulting. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://*.posthog.com https://va.vercel-scripts.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob:; font-src 'self' data:; connect-src 'self' https://*.posthog.com https://vitals.vercel-insights.com; worker-src 'self' blob: data:; frame-ancestors 'none'; |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=() |
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.sophon.consulting/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.sophon.consulting/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://www.sophon.consulting/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability.
assess_ai_readiness Assess AI readiness ~243
Assess an organization's readiness to run AI in production across five dimensions (data readiness, workflow ownership, governance and controls, delivery capacity, executive sponsorship), each scored 1-5 with evidence or marked unknown, plus classified candidate use cases. Returns a deterministic verdict — Ready, Ready with conditions, Not yet ready, or Insufficient evidence (thresholds: ready needs no dimension below 3; 2+ dimensions at 2 or below is not yet ready) — with a handoff-ready Markdown assessment. Read-only; not for triaging a single AI idea (use triage_ai_opportunity).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dimensions | object | yes | All five readiness dimensions, each scored 1-5 with evidence, or marked unknown. |
| organizationName | string | yes | The organization or team being assessed. |
| preparedFor | string | — | Optional sponsor or requester the assessment is prepared for. |
| risks | array | — | Optional risk register entries; scoring gaps should each become one. |
| sequencing | object | — | Optional 30-60-90 day sequencing recommendation. |
| useCases | array | yes | Candidate AI use cases, each classified start-now, prepare-first, or defer. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
triage_ai_opportunity Triage an AI opportunity ~194
Score one proposed AI workflow across bottleneck severity, value capture, integration readiness, and risk posture. Returns a deterministic go-deeper or hold recommendation and a handoff-ready Markdown artifact. Read-only; not for organization-wide readiness reviews or production rollout planning.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| canAnswerTopFollowUpInOneBusinessDay | boolean | — | Needed only when the total is 10-13: whether the highest-impact follow-up can plausibly be answered within one business day. |
| confidence | string | — | Optional confidence override. The rubric supplies a conservative default. |
| decisionContext | string | yes | The concrete decision this triage will inform. |
| followUps | array | — | Up to five questions ranked by how much their answers could change the decision. |
| lenses | object | yes | — |
| requestedBy | string | — | Optional person or team requesting the triage. |
| workflowName | string | yes | The specific workflow being evaluated. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.