Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

commit-check MCP

PYPI · COMMIT-CHECK-MCP

Commit policy as code for AI agents: check commit messages, branch names and authors before a push

Available components

0 this week 92 Trust /100

Last scanned (22 hours ago)

Scores higher than 95% of PyPI servers

Category Version Control

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Runs setuptools.build_meta at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • 1 of 30 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency97
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to commit-check/commit-check-mcp). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 27 days ago).Pass
  • Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability60
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 4072 tokens (~509/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Nov 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 2 Nov 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 1 Nov 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 30 Oct 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 29 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 17 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 16 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 14 Oct 26 +42
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.90 ▲ functional
    • Package version: 0.1.11 → 0.1.12 functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/commit-check-mcp@0.1.12

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem pypi
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo commit-check/commit-check-mcp
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/commit-check/commit-check-mcp/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/tags/v0.1.12
Rekor log index 3141230908
Predicate type PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1
Subject digest sha256:b7f5ec701f78cc20bcbb337999cce82b1059cd7783e4c46c9a7a6dd4f58fa70f

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend allowlisted setuptools.build_meta

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 30 packages
Packages resolved 30
No linked repository 1
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 8 exposed · ~3,860 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
describe_validation_rules ~266

Return the commit-check rules that are in effect after merging the built-in defaults, the repository's config file (or config_path) and the inline config overrides. Read-only, no side effects. Returns {commit_check_version, config (the merged config), supported_checks (every check name commit-check knows), enabled_rules[]} where each enabled rule carries its check name, config and pattern details. Use this before writing a commit message or branch name to learn the expected format instead of guessing, and to debug why a validation failed or was skipped.

NameTypeReqDescription
config––Inline commit-check config overrides as a JSON object, merged on top of the built-in defaults and any config file, e.g. {"warn": ["message"]} or {"commit": {"require_body": true}}.
config_path––Path to a commit-check TOML config file, used instead of the repository's own cchk.toml/commit-check.toml; a relative path is resolved from repo_path.
repo_path––Path to the git repository to validate against. Its cchk.toml or commit-check.toml (also looked up under .github/) is loaded, and a relative config_path is resolved from it. Omit to use the server's…

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

server_health ~55

Return server and dependency versions. Read-only, no side effects. Returns {server, server_version, commit_check_version, mcp_sdk_version}. Useful as a first call to verify the server is running and to check version compatibility.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

validate_author_info ~555

Validate a commit author's name and/or email against the configured rules (e.g. allowed email domains, name patterns). Read-only. Returns {status, warnings, checks[]}. status is 'pass', 'fail' or 'skip': only 'fail' is a rejection; 'skip' means every check skipped, so nothing was validated and the result is not approval. warnings is the number of checks with status 'warn'. Each check has: rule_id (stable rule id, e.g. 'CC001'); check (rule name, e.g. 'message'); status 'pass' | 'fail' | 'warn' | 'skip' ('warn' = the config lists the check under warn, so the finding is reported without failing the run; 'skip' = the rule did not run, e.g. the author is in ignore_authors or there was nothing to check); value (what was checked); error (why it failed); suggest (advice for a person); fix (the corrected value when the correction is unambiguous, else ''); docs_url (documentation for the rule). On 'fail', apply a non-empty fix verbatim; when fix is '', rewrite following suggest; then validate again. Use this to check author metadata before committing. Only the values you pass are checked; if neither is given, both are read from repo_path's git config (falling back to the latest commit) and repo_path must be a git repository. For combined validation use validate_commit_context.

NameTypeReqDescription
author_email––Author email to validate, e.g. 'alice@example.com'. Omit to read it from repo_path (git config user.email, falling back to the latest commit's author). Must be non-empty when provided.
author_name––Author name to validate, e.g. 'Alice Example'. Omit to read it from repo_path (git config user.name, falling back to the latest commit's author). Must be non-empty when provided.
config––Inline commit-check config overrides as a JSON object, merged on top of the built-in defaults and any config file, e.g. {"warn": ["message"]} or {"commit": {"require_body": true}}.
config_path––Path to a commit-check TOML config file, used instead of the repository's own cchk.toml/commit-check.toml; a relative path is resolved from repo_path.
repo_path––Path to the git repository to validate against. Its cchk.toml or commit-check.toml (also looked up under .github/) is loaded, and a relative config_path is resolved from it. Omit to use the server's…

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

validate_branch_name ~494

Validate a branch name against the configured naming convention (e.g. feature/*, bugfix/*) and, when configured, that the branch is based on the required merge base. Read-only. Returns {status, warnings, checks[]}. status is 'pass', 'fail' or 'skip': only 'fail' is a rejection; 'skip' means every check skipped, so nothing was validated and the result is not approval. warnings is the number of checks with status 'warn'. Each check has: rule_id (stable rule id, e.g. 'CC001'); check (rule name, e.g. 'message'); status 'pass' | 'fail' | 'warn' | 'skip' ('warn' = the config lists the check under warn, so the finding is reported without failing the run; 'skip' = the rule did not run, e.g. the author is in ignore_authors or there was nothing to check); value (what was checked); error (why it failed); suggest (advice for a person); fix (the corrected value when the correction is unambiguous, else ''); docs_url (documentation for the rule). On 'fail', apply a non-empty fix verbatim; when fix is '', rewrite following suggest; then validate again. Use this before creating or pushing a branch. Omit branch to check the branch currently checked out in repo_path. For combined message+branch+author validation use validate_commit_context.

NameTypeReqDescription
branch––Branch name to validate, e.g. 'feature/login'. Omit to validate the branch currently checked out in repo_path, which must then be a git repository. Must be non-empty when provided.
config––Inline commit-check config overrides as a JSON object, merged on top of the built-in defaults and any config file, e.g. {"warn": ["message"]} or {"commit": {"require_body": true}}.
config_path––Path to a commit-check TOML config file, used instead of the repository's own cchk.toml/commit-check.toml; a relative path is resolved from repo_path.
repo_path––Path to the git repository to validate against. Its cchk.toml or commit-check.toml (also looked up under .github/) is loaded, and a relative config_path is resolved from it. Omit to use the server's…

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

validate_commit_context ~652

Run the commit message, branch name and author checks together in one call, for whichever of message, branch, author_name and author_email you pass. Read-only. Returns {status, warnings, checks[]}. status is 'pass', 'fail' or 'skip': only 'fail' is a rejection; 'skip' means every check skipped, so nothing was validated and the result is not approval. warnings is the number of checks with status 'warn'. Each check has: rule_id (stable rule id, e.g. 'CC001'); check (rule name, e.g. 'message'); status 'pass' | 'fail' | 'warn' | 'skip' ('warn' = the config lists the check under warn, so the finding is reported without failing the run; 'skip' = the rule did not run, e.g. the author is in ignore_authors or there was nothing to check); value (what was checked); error (why it failed); suggest (advice for a person); fix (the corrected value when the correction is unambiguous, else ''); docs_url (documentation for the rule). On 'fail', apply a non-empty fix verbatim; when fix is '', rewrite following suggest; then validate again. Use this to validate several aspects of a commit you are about to make with a single call. At least one of message, branch, author_name or author_email is required; omitted aspects are not checked. For one aspect use validate_commit_message, validate_branch_name or validate_author_info; for the commit already at HEAD use validate_repository_state.

NameTypeReqDescription
author_email––Author email to validate, e.g. 'alice@example.com'. Omit to read it from repo_path (git config user.email, falling back to the latest commit's author). Must be non-empty when provided.
author_name––Author name to validate, e.g. 'Alice Example'. Omit to read it from repo_path (git config user.name, falling back to the latest commit's author). Must be non-empty when provided.
branch––Branch name to validate, e.g. 'feature/login'. Omit to validate the branch currently checked out in repo_path, which must then be a git repository. Must be non-empty when provided.
config––Inline commit-check config overrides as a JSON object, merged on top of the built-in defaults and any config file, e.g. {"warn": ["message"]} or {"commit": {"require_body": true}}.
config_path––Path to a commit-check TOML config file, used instead of the repository's own cchk.toml/commit-check.toml; a relative path is resolved from repo_path.
message––Commit message text to validate: subject line, optional blank line, body. Omit to skip the message checks. Must be non-empty when provided.
repo_path––Path to the git repository to validate against. Its cchk.toml or commit-check.toml (also looked up under .github/) is loaded, and a relative config_path is resolved from it. Omit to use the server's…

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

validate_commit_message ~505

Validate a commit message against commit-check rules (Conventional Commits type and format, subject length and case, body, sign-off, WIP/fixup markers, AI attribution: whatever the effective config enables). Read-only; touches no git state. Returns {status, warnings, checks[]}. status is 'pass', 'fail' or 'skip': only 'fail' is a rejection; 'skip' means every check skipped, so nothing was validated and the result is not approval. warnings is the number of checks with status 'warn'. Each check has: rule_id (stable rule id, e.g. 'CC001'); check (rule name, e.g. 'message'); status 'pass' | 'fail' | 'warn' | 'skip' ('warn' = the config lists the check under warn, so the finding is reported without failing the run; 'skip' = the rule did not run, e.g. the author is in ignore_authors or there was nothing to check); value (what was checked); error (why it failed); suggest (advice for a person); fix (the corrected value when the correction is unambiguous, else ''); docs_url (documentation for the rule). On 'fail', apply a non-empty fix verbatim; when fix is '', rewrite following suggest; then validate again. Use this when you have one commit message string to check before committing. To check message, branch and author in one call use validate_commit_context; to check the latest commit already in a repository use validate_repository_state.

NameTypeReqDescription
config––Inline commit-check config overrides as a JSON object, merged on top of the built-in defaults and any config file, e.g. {"warn": ["message"]} or {"commit": {"require_body": true}}.
config_path––Path to a commit-check TOML config file, used instead of the repository's own cchk.toml/commit-check.toml; a relative path is resolved from repo_path.
messagestringyesFull commit message text to validate: subject line, optional blank line, body (and trailers such as Signed-off-by). Must be non-empty.
repo_path––Path to the git repository to validate against. Its cchk.toml or commit-check.toml (also looked up under .github/) is loaded, and a relative config_path is resolved from it. Omit to use the server's…

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

validate_push_safety ~709

Check that a pending push is not a force push (rule CC301, no_force_push): fails when a remote_sha is not an ancestor of its local_sha, i.e. the push would rewrite remote history. Leaves your working tree and commits untouched, but may run `git fetch <remote> <ref>` to resolve SHAs, which updates FETCH_HEAD and remote-tracking refs. A SHA that cannot be resolved even then is a tool error, never a pass. Force pushes are always rejected by this tool; push.allow_force_push in config cannot re-enable them here. Returns {status, warnings, checks[]}. status is 'pass', 'fail' or 'skip': only 'fail' is a rejection; 'skip' means every check skipped, so nothing was validated and the result is not approval. warnings is the number of checks with status 'warn'. Each check has: rule_id (stable rule id, e.g. 'CC001'); check (rule name, e.g. 'message'); status 'pass' | 'fail' | 'warn' | 'skip' ('warn' = the config lists the check under warn, so the finding is reported without failing the run; 'skip' = the rule did not run, e.g. the author is in ignore_authors or there was nothing to check); value (what was checked); error (why it failed); suggest (advice for a person); fix (the corrected value when the correction is unambiguous, else ''); docs_url (documentation for the rule). On 'fail', apply a non-empty fix verbatim; when fix is '', rewrite following suggest; then validate again. Call this before `git push`. Only the no_force_push rule runs. When it fails there is no automatic fix (fix is ''): follow suggest, i.e. push without --force/--force-with-lease or rebase onto the remote first, then validate again.

NameTypeReqDescription
config––Inline commit-check config overrides as a JSON object, merged on top of the built-in defaults and any config file, e.g. {"warn": ["message"]} or {"commit": {"require_body": true}}.
config_path––Path to a commit-check TOML config file, used instead of the repository's own cchk.toml/commit-check.toml; a relative path is resolved from repo_path.
push_refs––Refs about to be pushed, in git pre-push hook stdin format, one ref per line: '<local_ref> <local_sha> <remote_ref> <remote_sha>', e.g. 'refs/heads/main 1a2b3c... refs/heads/main 9f8e7d...'. A remote…
repo_path––Path to the git repository to validate against. Its cchk.toml or commit-check.toml (also looked up under .github/) is loaded, and a relative config_path is resolved from it. Omit to use the server's…

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

validate_repository_state ~624

Validate what is already in a local git repository: the latest commit's message and author, the checked-out branch name and, optionally, whether pushing that branch to its upstream would be a force push. Leaves the working tree and commits untouched; the push check may run `git fetch`, which updates FETCH_HEAD and remote-tracking refs. Returns {status, warnings, checks[]}. status is 'pass', 'fail' or 'skip': only 'fail' is a rejection; 'skip' means every check skipped, so nothing was validated and the result is not approval. warnings is the number of checks with status 'warn'. Each check has: rule_id (stable rule id, e.g. 'CC001'); check (rule name, e.g. 'message'); status 'pass' | 'fail' | 'warn' | 'skip' ('warn' = the config lists the check under warn, so the finding is reported without failing the run; 'skip' = the rule did not run, e.g. the author is in ignore_authors or there was nothing to check); value (what was checked); error (why it failed); suggest (advice for a person); fix (the corrected value when the correction is unambiguous, else ''); docs_url (documentation for the rule). On 'fail', apply a non-empty fix verbatim; when fix is '', rewrite following suggest; then validate again. Use this to check a repository's current state in one call, e.g. after committing and before pushing, or in a hook. The include_* flags select the checks; at least one must be true. To validate values that are not yet committed use validate_commit_context or the single-aspect tools.

NameTypeReqDescription
config––Inline commit-check config overrides as a JSON object, merged on top of the built-in defaults and any config file, e.g. {"warn": ["message"]} or {"commit": {"require_body": true}}.
config_path––Path to a commit-check TOML config file, used instead of the repository's own cchk.toml/commit-check.toml; a relative path is resolved from repo_path.
include_authorboolean–Validate the author name and email of the latest commit (falling back to git config user.name/user.email). Default true.
include_branchboolean–Validate the name of the currently checked-out branch. Default true.
include_messageboolean–Validate the message of the latest commit (HEAD). Default true.
include_pushboolean–Also check that pushing the current branch to its upstream would not be a force push; may run git fetch (updating FETCH_HEAD), and passes when the branch has no upstream. Default false.
repo_path––Path to the git repository to inspect; its cchk.toml or commit-check.toml is loaded and a relative config_path is resolved from it. Omit to use the server's working directory, which must then be a gi…

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the commit-check MCP server?

commit-check MCP runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx commit-check-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · commit-check-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add commit-check-commit-check-mcp -- uvx commit-check-mcp
Common questions

What is the commit-check MCP server?

commit-check MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.commit-check/commit-check-mcp. Commit policy as code for AI agents: check commit messages, branch names and authors before a push. This page covers its PyPI package (commit-check-mcp).

Is the commit-check MCP server safe to use?

commit-check MCP scores 92 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 4 November 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the commit-check MCP server expose?

commit-check MCP exposes 8 tools: server_health, validate_commit_message, validate_branch_name, validate_author_info, validate_push_safety, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 3,860 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the commit-check MCP server still maintained?

commit-check MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the commit-check MCP server under?

commit-check MCP declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.