io.github.commet/argus-decision-mcp
NPM · ARGUS-DECISION-MCP · SCANNED SEP 27
Preserve a user-authorized judgment and append later answers. No model verdict or human score.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security98
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 32 of 98 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to commet/Argus). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 46 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2254 tokens (~281/item across 8 items; 6 tools + 2 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management83
- Stability observed for 25 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage81
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 33% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the io.github.commet/argus-decision-mcp server?
io.github.commet/argus-decision-mcp runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y argus-decision-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · argus-decision-mcp
claude mcp add commet-argus-decision-mcp -- npx -y argus-decision-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"commet-argus-decision-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"argus-decision-mcp"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"commet-argus-decision-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"argus-decision-mcp"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add commet-argus-decision-mcp -- npx -y argus-decision-mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"commet-argus-decision-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"argus-decision-mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add commet-argus-decision-mcp --command npx --arg -y --arg argus-decision-mcp
mcp_servers:
commet-argus-decision-mcp:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "argus-decision-mcp"] {
"McpServers": {
"commet-argus-decision-mcp": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"argus-decision-mcp"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add commet-argus-decision-mcp -t stdio -c npx -a -y argus-decision-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"commet-argus-decision-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"argus-decision-mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 27 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 25 Sept 26 +11
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 23 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 18 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 16 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 27 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/argus-decision-mcp@2.0.23
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | commet/Argus |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/commet/Argus/.github/workflows/publish-mcp.yml@refs/heads/main |
| Rekor log index | 2429148712 |
| Predicate type | SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha512:b188133bc5a7b92cf9918ba2038e63b700d260bbab8256bbe4eb7d0f9939d1ec392b02b9d97dd5b09c7c1d43c223e7faaf8a12d0035411f90ed417bae |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 98 packages
| Packages resolved | 98 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 32 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
argus_capture 결정 다루기 · Work with a decision ~520
결정을 대신 내리지 않고, 그 결정이 어떤 전제 위에 서 있는지와 아직 열린 질문을 사용자의 말 그대로 포착합니다. 기록된 결정의 전제·현재 사실·예측 문장·상태도 관리합니다. Capture a decision and its user-stated context without deciding for the user. Preserve at most one load-bearing assumption; tag an AI-drafted premise as ai_surfaced. A decision the user has closed or told you not to revisit is never capture material — acknowledge it and move on; recording it re-opens it.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | 수행할 세부 작업입니다. The operation to perform. |
| already_decided | boolean | – | – |
| amendment | string | – | amend_context에서 전제를 고치는 방식입니다. How to amend a premise for action=amend_context. |
| apply_to_matching | boolean | – | – |
| argus_dir | string | – | – |
| changed | boolean | – | – |
| check_by | string | – | 예측을 현실과 대조할 미래 확인일(YYYY-MM-DD)입니다. Future date, in YYYY-MM-DD, when the prediction can be checked. |
| decision | string | – | – |
| dismiss_reason | string | – | – |
| external | boolean | – | – |
| finding | string | – | – |
| id | string | – | 결정 식별자입니다. Stable identifier for the decision. |
| load_bearing | boolean | – | – |
| load_bearing_assumption | string | – | – |
| monitoring_enabled | boolean | – | – |
| note | string | – | – |
| numeric_value | number | – | – |
| predicate | string | – | 현실이 참/거짓으로 확인할 수 있는 예측입니다. A falsifiable prediction that reality can answer. |
| premises | array | – | 추가할 전제 또는 미결 질문 목록입니다. Premises or open questions to add. |
| recheck_cadence_days | integer | – | – |
| reconsider_cadence_days | integer | – | – |
| ref | string | – | – |
| related_to | array | – | – |
| reversibility | string | – | – |
| source | string | – | action=update_fact에서만 사용: 현재 사실을 확인한 출처(url | user_stated | host_reported). For update_fact only. |
| source_detail | string | – | – |
| stakes | string | – | – |
| status_quo | string | – | – |
| text | string | – | 사용자가 고친 전제 원문입니다. The user’s corrected premise wording. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | object | – | – |
| error_code | string | – | – |
| invalid_fields | array | – | – |
| message | string | – | – |
| next_actions | array | – | – |
| ok | boolean | yes | – |
| over_fire_gate | object | – | – |
| recovery | string | – | – |
| surface | string | – | – |
| tool | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
argus_check_in 확인할 기록 보기 · Check what is due ~75
확인일이 됐거나 다시 살펴볼 결정·전제·미결 질문을 보여줍니다. Show only open records that need attention now. Reads open records; the first call may initialize the ledger folder.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| argus_dir | string | – | – |
| include_upcoming_days | integer | – | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | object | – | – |
| error_code | string | – | – |
| invalid_fields | array | – | – |
| message | string | – | – |
| next_actions | array | – | – |
| ok | boolean | yes | – |
| over_fire_gate | object | – | – |
| recovery | string | – | – |
| surface | string | – | – |
| tool | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
argus_patterns 판단 기록 보기 · View judgment history ~209
진행 중인 결정, 전체 기록, 판단 영수증, 전제, 누적 기록을 읽고, 당신이 쓴 예측·전제와 그 결과를 되읽는 회고를 봅니다. Read active decisions, receipts, timelines, and recurring patterns. Read-only; history is context, never a verdict.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| argus_dir | string | – | – |
| id | string | – | 결정 식별자입니다. Stable identifier for the decision. |
| view | string | – | 불러올 기록의 종류입니다. Which part of the decision record to read. active는 진행 중인 결정, all은 전체 기록, receipt는 판단 영수증, decision_context는 결정의 전제와 미결 질문, timeline은 누적 정산 결과 요약(예측대로·걱정 피함·일부·빗나감 빈도), reflection은 당신… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | object | – | – |
| error_code | string | – | – |
| invalid_fields | array | – | – |
| message | string | – | – |
| next_actions | array | – | – |
| ok | boolean | yes | – |
| over_fire_gate | object | – | – |
| recovery | string | – | – |
| surface | string | – | – |
| tool | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
argus_predict 예측 저장 · Seal a prediction ~440
현실이 확인할 수 있는 예측과 확인일을 저장하고 작성 주체를 정직하게 기록합니다. Record one falsifiable prediction and when reality can answer it. Use the user’s words and offer confirmation once.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| argus_dir | string | – | – |
| basis | string | – | – |
| check_by | string | yes | 예측을 현실과 대조할 미래 확인일(YYYY-MM-DD)입니다. Future date, in YYYY-MM-DD, when the prediction can be checked. |
| confirm_draft | boolean | – | AI가 만든 예측 초안을 사용자에게 한 번에 확인받을 때 사용합니다. Ask for one-tap confirmation when the AI drafted the prediction. Force the one-tap confirm even for a "user" predicate. ai_surfaced gets it automatically on h… |
| human_judgment | string | – | – |
| human_only | string | – | – |
| id | string | yes | 결정 식별자입니다. Stable identifier for the decision. A short slug you pick for this decision (e.g. "q3-cutover"). A fresh id starts the record on its own. |
| predicate | string | yes | 현실이 참/거짓으로 확인할 수 있는 예측입니다. A falsifiable prediction that reality can answer. ONE prediction reality can mark true/false. If the user bundled several, seal the most load-bearing one now and tell the… |
| predicate_owner | string | yes | 예측 문장의 작성 주체입니다. 출처를 꾸미지 않습니다. Who authored the prediction. Never forge provenance. Provenance. Never forge. "user" = the user wrote or affirmed it. "ai_surfaced" = Argus drafted, unconfirmed — on… |
| real_question | string | – | – |
| unverified_assumption | string | – | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | object | – | – |
| error_code | string | – | – |
| invalid_fields | array | – | – |
| message | string | – | – |
| next_actions | array | – | – |
| ok | boolean | yes | – |
| over_fire_gate | object | – | – |
| recovery | string | – | – |
| surface | string | – | – |
| tool | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
argus_resolve 실제 결과 기록 · Settle against reality ~378
확인일이 된 예측에 실제로 일어난 일을 기록합니다. Argus는 결과를 평가하지 않습니다. Record an outcome the user explicitly stated for a tracked prediction. Reality answers; Argus never grades.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| argus_dir | string | – | – |
| broken_premise_ref | string | – | – |
| defer_to | string | – | – |
| id | string | yes | 결정 식별자입니다. Stable identifier for the decision. |
| outcome | string | – | 예측에 대해 현실에서 실제로 일어난 결과입니다. 모델이 추론하지 않습니다. What actually happened to the prediction. The model must not infer it. What reality did to the prediction — record the user's words, never infer. Definitio… |
| outcome_source | string | – | 결과를 말한 주체입니다. 현재는 user_stated만 허용합니다. Who stated the result. Only user_stated is accepted. Always "user_stated" — an AI-inferred outcome cannot be expressed. Defaulted, so you may omit it. |
| what_happened | string | – | 실제로 일어난 일을 사용자의 말로 기록합니다. What actually happened, in the user’s own words. What reality did, in the user's words. Required when recording held/avoided/partial/missed. Omit for still_pending and pas… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | object | – | – |
| error_code | string | – | – |
| invalid_fields | array | – | – |
| message | string | – | – |
| next_actions | array | – | – |
| ok | boolean | yes | – |
| over_fire_gate | object | – | – |
| recovery | string | – | – |
| surface | string | – | – |
| tool | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
argus_settings Argus 설정 · Argus settings ~135
언어와 알림, 전제 동기화 설정을 관리하고 필요할 때 계정 기록을 동기화합니다. Read or update language, reminders, and explicit sync settings. Argus initializes the current project on first use.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | 수행할 세부 작업입니다. The operation to perform. |
| ambient_mute | boolean | – | – |
| argus_dir | string | – | – |
| due_only | boolean | – | – |
| import_settlements | boolean | – | – |
| locale | string | – | – |
| premise_sync | boolean | – | – |
| push_local | boolean | – | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | object | – | – |
| error_code | string | – | – |
| invalid_fields | array | – | – |
| message | string | – | – |
| next_actions | array | – | – |
| ok | boolean | yes | – |
| over_fire_gate | object | – | – |
| recovery | string | – | – |
| surface | string | – | – |
| tool | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.commet/argus-decision-mcp server?
io.github.commet/argus-decision-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.commet/argus-decision-mcp. Preserve a user-authorized judgment and append later answers. No model verdict or human score. This page covers its npm package (argus-decision-mcp).
Is the io.github.commet/argus-decision-mcp server safe to use?
io.github.commet/argus-decision-mcp scores 91 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 27 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.commet/argus-decision-mcp server expose?
io.github.commet/argus-decision-mcp exposes 6 tools: argus_capture, argus_predict, argus_check_in, argus_resolve, argus_patterns, argus_settings. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,757 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.commet/argus-decision-mcp server still maintained?
io.github.commet/argus-decision-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 27 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.commet/argus-decision-mcp server under?
io.github.commet/argus-decision-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.