Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

WPFormation : WordPress en français

REMOTE · WPFORMATION.COM

Articles WordPress en français et outils d'analyse de sites, de domaines et de plugins.

Available components

+3 this week 85 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 hours ago)

Scores higher than 91% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Security

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security83
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability85
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1151 tokens (~115/item across 10 items; 7 tools + 3 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management63
  • Stability observed for 19 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (29% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://wpformation.com/api/mcp/

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=wpformation.com CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 25 Oct 2026 23 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 50ebbe3d1ce551ae938e36f316b8106cbb4
SANs: wpformation.com
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC secure

Validation of wpformation.com. — Secure

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
wpformation.com. present 40969 8 Verified
wpformation.com. Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'wasm-unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://challenges.cloudflare.com https://platform.twitter.com https://apis.google.com https://news.google.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: https://wpformation.com https://api.wpformation.com https://secure.gravatar.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://*.googleusercontent.com https://storage.googleapis.com https://media.giphy.com https://web.archive.org https://www.wpserveur.net https://www.blog2social.com https://www.elegantthemes.com https://ps.w.org https://s.w.org https://ts.w.org https://wpastra.com https://img.youtube.com https://i.vimeocdn.com; font-src 'self' data:; connect-src 'self' https://www.google-analytics.com https://analytics.google.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://*.analytics.google.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://challenges.cloudflare.com https://news.google.com; m
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), payment=(), usb=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://wpformation.com/api/mcp/ Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://wpformation.com/api/mcp/ HTTPS enforced 308 https://wpformation.com/api/mcp/
MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~856 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
auditer_agent_readiness ~103

Audite une page sur sa préparation aux agents IA (llms.txt, données structurées, contenu citable, E-E-A-T, compatibilité avec les assistants IA). Version allégée gratuite. Retourne un score sur 100, une note et les lacunes prioritaires.

NameTypeReqDescription
urlstringyesAdresse publique de la page à auditer : URL complète ou nom de domaine (ex : https://exemple.fr/ ou exemple.fr)
NameTypeReqDescription
benchmarkstring––
categoriesarray––
errorstring––
fullReportUrlstringyes–
gradestring––
maxScorenumber––
pageTypestring––
platformsarray––
quickWinsarray––
scorenumber––
statusstringyes–
urlstring––
weakSpotsarray––

No examples provided.

comparer_plugins ~107

Compare de 2 à 4 plugins WordPress de l'annuaire wordpress.org avec le barème du score de confiance WPFormation : score sur 100, verdict sécurité, failles sans correctif, détail par catégorie, installations actives, dernière mise à jour, note des utilisateurs. Mesure la fiabilité, pas les fonctionnalités.

NameTypeReqDescription
slugsarrayyesSlugs wordpress.org ou noms des plugins, ex : ["wordpress-seo", "seo-by-rank-math"]

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

detecter_wordpress ~99

Indique si un site public utilise WordPress et repère ce qui est visible depuis l'extérieur : version, thème (et thème parent), plugins présents dans le code de la page, constructeur de pages, hébergement, CDN, mode headless. La liste des plugins n'est jamais exhaustive.

NameTypeReqDescription
urlstringyesAdresse publique du site : URL complète ou nom de domaine (ex : https://exemple.fr/ ou exemple.fr)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_article ~191

Lit un article WPFormation : titre, catégorie, dates et texte, avec le sommaire des intertitres pour un article long. Le paramètre section (ancre, numéro du sommaire ou mots de l'intertitre) renvoie une seule partie ; une adresse avec #ancre aussi. Accepte le slug ou l'adresse complète ; une ancienne adresse redirigée renvoie l'article qui la remplace. Une catégorie, une page de service ou un outil renvoie sa présentation ; une adresse inconnue, les articles proches.

NameTypeReqDescription
sectionstring–Partie à lire : ancre ou numéro donnés par le sommaire, ou mots de l'intertitre (ex : 2, ou mises-a-jour)
slugstringyesSlug ou adresse de l'article, ex : securiser-wordpress ou https://wpformation.com/securiser-wordpress/

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

radar_domaine ~89

Contrôle un nom de domaine : inscription (bureau d'enregistrement, expiration, verrouillage), DNS et hébergement, messagerie (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) et certificat HTTPS. Chaque constat est classé (vert, orange, rouge) avec l'action à mener.

NameTypeReqDescription
domainstringyesNom de domaine, ex : exemple.fr (une adresse complète est acceptée)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_articles ~115

Recherche dans les contenus de WPFormation, site français sur WordPress (tutoriels, sécurité, SEO, IA, thèmes, plugins, WooCommerce, headless) : articles avec la section qui répond, fiches de plugins et de thèmes, pages et outils gratuits. Requête en français de préférence ; les termes anglais courants sont traduits.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger–Nombre de résultats (max 10)
querystringyesTermes de recherche, en français de préférence (ex : sécuriser wordpress)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

verifier_securite_plugin ~152

Évalue la fiabilité d'un plugin WordPress par son slug wordpress.org (ex : contact-form-7) ou son nom (ex : Contact Form 7). Retourne le score de confiance WPFormation sur 100 et une note de A à F (13 critères : sécurité, maintenance, communauté, support), le détail par catégorie, les vulnérabilités connues (gravité, version corrigée) et un verdict. Même barème que le Vérificateur Plugins de wpformation.com. Données WordPress.org et WPVulnerability.

NameTypeReqDescription
slugstringyesSlug wordpress.org ou nom du plugin, ex : woocommerce, contact-form-7, Yoast SEO
NameTypeReqDescription
matchedFromstring–Nom saisi, quand il a été ramené à un slug
pluginobject––
reportUrlstringyes–
slugstring––
statusstringyesok : rapport calculé ; introuvable : absent de l'annuaire wordpress.org
suggestionsarray––

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the WPFormation : WordPress en français MCP server?

WPFormation : WordPress en français is a hosted endpoint at https://wpformation.com/api/mcp/, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · wpformation.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-wpformation-wordpress 'https://wpformation.com/api/mcp/'
Common questions

What is the WPFormation : WordPress en français MCP server?

WPFormation : WordPress en français is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.wpformation/wordpress. Articles WordPress en français et outils d'analyse de sites, de domaines et de plugins. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://wpformation.com/api/mcp/).

Is the WPFormation : WordPress en français MCP server safe to use?

WPFormation : WordPress en français scores 85 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the WPFormation : WordPress en français MCP server expose?

WPFormation : WordPress en français exposes 7 tools: search_articles, get_article, verifier_securite_plugin, comparer_plugins, detecter_wordpress, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 856 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the WPFormation : WordPress en français MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to WPFormation : WordPress en français without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the WPFormation : WordPress en français MCP server still maintained?

WPFormation : WordPress en français is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.