Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Worder

REMOTE · WWW.WORDER.COM

Find and price AI voices from real, verified voice actors in ten languages. Read-only, no sign-up.

Available components

+3 this week 81 Trust /100

Last scanned (1 hour ago)

Scores higher than 84% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Design and Media

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability78
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 506 tokens (~72/item across 7 items; 6 tools + 1 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management53
  • Stability observed for 16 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage94
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 83% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 0
    • Tool “search_voices” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.worder.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=www.worder.com CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 25 Sept 2026 24 Dec 2026 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 5b2d066dc3cd7a96d87027c3336ecb9bc64
SANs: www.worder.com
CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of www.worder.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
worder.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://www.worder.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://www.worder.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://www.worder.com/mcp
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~421 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
about_worder ~35

What Worder is, how voice actors are paid, what happens to voice data, which languages are supported and how pricing works.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

estimate_cost ~68

Estimate how many seconds of audio a script will produce with a given voice and what it will cost in USD at that voice's per-second price, the way Worder bills it.

NameTypeReqDescription
scriptstringyesThe text to be spoken, direction tags included.
voiceIdstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_voice ~57

Full public details of one voice by id: actor, language, price per second, samples, direction tags, excluded use cases, and the links to listen and generate.

NameTypeReqDescription
voiceIdstringyesThe voice id from search_voices.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

how_to_order ~34

The steps to go from a chosen voice to a downloaded audio file, including pricing, previews, credits and the refund guarantee.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_languages ~38

The languages Worder voices speak, with the number of public voices per language and per country variant, and a link to each language's catalog page.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_voices ~189

Find licensed AI voices on Worder by language plus free text: name, accent, delivery tag (warm, calm, energetic...), actor or sample label. Each word is matched on its own and the voices matching the most words come first. Returns the voice's per-second price in USD, its samples (as page links), the use cases its actor excludes, and links to listen and generate. Use list_languages to see what languages have voices.

NameTypeReqDescription
languagestring–A base language (English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Russian) or a variant such as "Spanish (Mexico)".
limitinteger–Voices to return (default 10, max 25).
querystring–Free text: a name, an accent, a delivery such as 'warm' or 'energetic', or an actor.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Worder MCP server?

Worder is a hosted endpoint at https://www.worder.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · www.worder.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-worder-worder 'https://www.worder.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Worder MCP server?

Worder is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.worder/worder. Find and price AI voices from real, verified voice actors in ten languages. Read-only, no sign-up. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.worder.com/mcp).

Is the Worder MCP server safe to use?

Worder scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Worder MCP server expose?

Worder exposes 6 tools: search_voices, get_voice, list_languages, estimate_cost, how_to_order, about_worder. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 421 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Worder MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Worder without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Worder MCP server still maintained?

Worder is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.