Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Botcard

REMOTE · WHOSTHATBOT.COM

Cited AI crawler registry (training, search or user fetch) plus robots.txt checks. No fetching.

Available components

72 Trust /100

Last scanned (10 hours ago)

Scores higher than 62% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 22 Oct 2026.

Category Web Scraping

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 777 tokens (~194/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management10
  • Stability observed for 3 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 19 Oct 26 70

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 22 Oct 2026 · Probed https://whosthatbot.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=whosthatbot.com CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 18 Oct 2026 16 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6e0878ccf16ddc940e8326890b3f7dfa6e4
SANs: whosthatbot.com
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of whosthatbot.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
whosthatbot.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000
content-security-policy frame-ancestors 'none'
x-content-type-options nosniff
referrer-policy no-referrer

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://whosthatbot.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://whosthatbot.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://whosthatbot.com/mcp
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~415 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_robots ~129

Match a robots.txt file the caller pastes against Botcard's AI crawler tokens, using RFC 9309. Each row is allow or disallow plus that token's vendor stance. This tool does not fetch any website. Do not send url, host, target, website, robots_url, or fetch.

NameTypeReqDescription
idsarray–Card ids to check, such as gptbot. Omit to check every card.
pathstring–Path to test, starting with /. Defaults to /.
robots_txtstringyesThe robots.txt file contents. Not a URL.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_crawler ~71

Return one card by id, including the vendor source URL and the date it was read. This tool does not fetch any website. Do not send url, host, target, website, robots_url, or fetch.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesCard id, such as gptbot or google-extended.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_crawlers ~58

List the AI crawler robots.txt tokens in this dataset. Each row names the vendor page the summary was checked against. This tool does not fetch any website. Do not send url, host, target, website, robots_url, or fetch.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

suggest_robots ~157

Write a robots.txt from this dataset for the kinds you allow or block. Each group cites the vendor page. effect request_only means the vendor does not say the crawler obeys that line. control_token is not training. The file has no User-agent: * group. This tool does not fetch any website. Do not send url, host, target, website, robots_url, or fetch.

NameTypeReqDescription
allowarray–Kinds to Allow, such as search.
blockarray–Kinds to Disallow, such as training.
pathstring–Path the Allow or Disallow names. Defaults to /.
policystring–Same choice in words, such as "allow search, block training".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Botcard MCP server?

Botcard is a hosted endpoint at https://whosthatbot.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · whosthatbot.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-whosthatbot-botcard 'https://whosthatbot.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Botcard MCP server?

Botcard is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.whosthatbot/botcard. Cited AI crawler registry (training, search or user fetch) plus robots.txt checks. No fetching. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://whosthatbot.com/mcp).

Is the Botcard MCP server safe to use?

Botcard scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Botcard MCP server expose?

Botcard exposes 4 tools: check_robots, list_crawlers, get_crawler, suggest_robots. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 415 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Botcard MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Botcard without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Botcard MCP server still maintained?

Botcard is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.