What's That Model?
REMOTE · WHATSTHATMODEL.COM
Sourced AI video/image capabilities, explained task recommendations and verified access context.
Available components
Last scanned (31 minutes ago)
Scores higher than 84% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category AI and Machine Learning
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security83
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability55
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 287 tokens (~35/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management93
- Stability observed for 28 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://whatsthatmodel.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=whatsthatmodel.com | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 7 Oct 2026 | 5 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 607cb3ae212d2cd4bde22d0b589c1db085e |
| SANs: whatsthatmodel.com | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of whatsthatmodel.com. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| whatsthatmodel.com. | present | 31675 | 8 | Verified |
| whatsthatmodel.com. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'none'; script-src 'self'; style-src 'self'; img-src 'self' data: https://cdn.higgsfield.ai https://images.higgs.ai https://d28lhcrx5qdowv.cloudfront.net https://cdn.sanity.io; font-src 'self'; media-src 'self' https://cdn.higgsfield.ai https://static.higgsfield.ai https://d28lhcrx5qdowv.cloudfront.net https://cdn.sanity.io; frame-src https://www.youtube-nocookie.com; connect-src 'self'; manifest-src 'self'; base-uri 'none'; form-action 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'; upgrade-insecure-requests |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), payment=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://whatsthatmodel.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://whatsthatmodel.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://whatsthatmodel.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
best_model_for ~37
Get an editorial shortlist for a known use case with verified constraints.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| constraints | object | – | – |
| use_case | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
compare_models ~34
Compare documented capabilities and task fit. Unknowns stay explicit.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| models | array | yes | – |
| task | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find_model ~41
Find an AI model by creation task and verified constraints. Editorial recommendation; not a benchmark score.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| constraints | object | – | – |
| task | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_model ~30
Get model capabilities, dated citations, editorial limitations and labeled optional access link.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| model | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_prompt_tips ~36
Get untested prompting guidance, clearly distinguished from measured outputs.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| model | string | yes | – |
| task | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_trending_workflows ~26
Get curated workflow spotlights; no unmeasured growth or income claims.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_models ~26
List curated AI models including independent non-affiliate alternatives.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| filters | object | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
where_to_use ~30
Return official and optional commercial access destinations, without guaranteeing plan entitlements.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| model | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the What's That Model? MCP server?
What's That Model? is a hosted endpoint at https://whatsthatmodel.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · whatsthatmodel.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-whatsthatmodel-whats-that-model 'https://whatsthatmodel.com/mcp'
What is the What's That Model? MCP server?
What's That Model? is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.whatsthatmodel/whats-that-model. Sourced AI video/image capabilities, explained task recommendations and verified access context. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://whatsthatmodel.com/mcp).
Is the What's That Model? MCP server safe to use?
What's That Model? scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the What's That Model? MCP server expose?
What's That Model? exposes 8 tools: find_model, compare_models, get_model, best_model_for, list_models, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 260 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the What's That Model? MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to What's That Model? without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the What's That Model? MCP server still maintained?
What's That Model? is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.