Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Western Reporting Services

REMOTE · WWW.WESTERNREPORTINGSERVICES.COM

Las Vegas court reporting firm (since 1990): guides, glossary, services and business facts.

+3 this week 75 Trust /100

Last scanned (5 hours ago)

Scores higher than 68% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 24 Oct 2026.

Category Documents and Files

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 684 tokens (~114/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management40
  • Stability observed for 12 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 14 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 13 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 12 Oct 26 70

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 24 Oct 2026 · Probed https://www.westernreportingservices.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=westernreportingservices.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 31 Aug 2026 29 Nov 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 e7f3c9e45520ca180e4d5b544a67bceb
SANs: westernreportingservices.com, *.westernreportingservices.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of www.westernreportingservices.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
westernreportingservices.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://www.westernreportingservices.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://www.westernreportingservices.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://www.westernreportingservices.com/mcp
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~533 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
wrs_business_facts ~53

Name, legal name, address, telephone, fax, service area, client portal, hours note and the list of services for Western Reporting Services, an independent Las Vegas court reporting firm (since 1990).

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

wrs_get_guide ~104

One guide in full as Markdown (sections, checklist, common questions) with its URL, dates and legal-source note. Pass the slug from wrs_list_guides or wrs_search.

NameTypeReqDescription
languagestring–en (default) or es, tl, zh, vi, ko.
slugstringyesGuide slug, e.g. how-to-prepare-for-a-deposition (translated guides use their own slug from wrs_list_guides).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

wrs_glossary_term ~76

Plain-English definition of a court reporting or deposition term (appearance fee, errata sheet, read and sign, realtime, rough draft, stenotype, 30(b)(6) and so on). Matches the term, an alias, or a close contains-match.

NameTypeReqDescription
termstringyesThe term to define.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

wrs_list_guides ~116

Index of the firm's long-form guides on depositions and Nevada court reporting practice: slug, title, description, published and updated dates, and whether the guide's Nevada legal statements are sourced from the FACTS rules report. Witness guides also exist in Spanish (es), Tagalog (tl), Simplified Chinese (zh), Vietnamese (vi) and Korean (ko); pass language to list those.

NameTypeReqDescription
languagestring–en (default) or es, tl, zh, vi, ko for the translated witness guides.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

wrs_list_services ~50

Every service Western Reporting Services offers (deposition reporting, realtime, transcripts, legal videography, interpreters, nationwide referral, conference rooms, remote depositions) with a summary and the page URL.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

wrs_search ~134

Keyword search across guide titles, section headings, body text and glossary terms. Returns the best matches with the page URL and a short snippet. Use wrs_get_guide for the full text of a match.

NameTypeReqDescription
languagestring–Restrict to one language: en, es, tl, zh, vi, ko. Default: all languages (search in the language of the query).
limitinteger–Maximum results (default 8, max 20).
querystringyesWords or a phrase to look for, e.g. 'errata sheet deadline' or 'remote deposition oath'.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Western Reporting Services MCP server?

Western Reporting Services is a hosted endpoint at https://www.westernreportingservices.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · www.westernreportingservices.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-westernreportingservices-guides 'https://www.westernreportingservices.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Western Reporting Services MCP server?

Western Reporting Services is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.westernreportingservices/guides. Las Vegas court reporting firm (since 1990): guides, glossary, services and business facts. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.westernreportingservices.com/mcp).

Is the Western Reporting Services MCP server safe to use?

Western Reporting Services scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Western Reporting Services MCP server expose?

Western Reporting Services exposes 6 tools: wrs_business_facts, wrs_list_services, wrs_list_guides, wrs_search, wrs_get_guide, wrs_glossary_term. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 533 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Western Reporting Services MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Western Reporting Services without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Western Reporting Services MCP server still maintained?

Western Reporting Services is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.