Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

com.vigotime/planner

REMOTE · API.VIGOTIME.COM

Compute real duty rosters from your AI assistant - rule-based vigotime planner, API key or OAuth.

Available components

0 this week 89 Trust /100

Last scanned (9 hours ago)

Scores higher than 97% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Project Management

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security89
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability77
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1233 tokens (~205/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (13)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 28 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Server version: 2915 → 3198 functional
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 18 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 15 Sept 26 0
    • Server version: 2907 → 2915 functional
  • 14 Sept 26 0
    • Server version: 2902 → 2907 functional
  • 11 Sept 26 0
    • Server version: 2874 → 2902 functional
  • 7 Sept 26 0
    • Server version: 2865 → 2874 functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://api.vigotime.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=planner.vigotime.com CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 30 Sept 2026 29 Dec 2026 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA 6abf27675beff70fe679446d16d2e98197a
SANs: api.vigotime.com, planner.vigotime.com
CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of api.vigotime.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. DS published 19718 13 Verified
vigotime.com. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Enforced and verified

The endpoint asked for a token and published valid RFC 9728 metadata describing how to get one.

Result Enforced and verified
Enforced On tool calls
HTTP status 200

WWW-Authenticate challenge Bearer resource_metadata="https://api.vigotime.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource"

Bearer resource_metadata="https://api.vigotime.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource"

Protected resource metadata

Document https://api.vigotime.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource
Retrieved Yes
Resource https://api.vigotime.com/mcp
Authorisation server https://api.vigotime.com

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://api.vigotime.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://api.vigotime.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://api.vigotime.com/mcp
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~431 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
account_balance ~23

Aktuelles Token-Guthaben der eigenen Organisation (Solves kosten Tokens).

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

example_payload ~110

Ein sofort lauffähiger Beispiel-Payload für solve_submit. kind='simple' (1 Woche, 3 MA, 2 Schichten), kind='wishes' (Wünsche, Social Points, Wunschkosten) oder kind='rules' (ArbZG-Planungsregeln: 11 h Ruhe hart + max. 5 Folgetage — zeigt, wie Regeln den Plan formen; Param-Namen sind exakt, falsche werden still ignoriert).

NameTypeReqDescription
kindstring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

service_info ~51

Build-Stand des laufenden Planner-Service: version (fortlaufende Build-Nummer), gitCommit, buildTime (UTC). Fuer Support-Anfragen und um Ergebnisse einem Software-Stand zuzuordnen.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

solve_result ~47

Ergebnis eines fertigen Solve-Jobs: assignments [{employee_id, shift_id, date}], unassigned_shifts mit Begründung, Statistiken.

NameTypeReqDescription
job_idstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

solve_status ~35

Status eines Solve-Jobs (pending/running/completed/failed) inkl. Fortschritt.

NameTypeReqDescription
job_idstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

solve_submit ~165

Reicht einen Dienstplan-Solve-Job ein. `payload` ist der self-contained Request: Pflicht: start_date, end_date (ISO), department {id}, employees [{id, contractHoursPerWeek, qualificationIds}], shifts [{id, departmentId, name, startTime, endTime, shiftType, minStaff}]. Optional u. a.: planning_rules, wishes, vacations, sick_leaves, holiday_dates, locked_assignments, social_points, wish_costs, config {timeout_seconds}. vacations darf Termine NACH end_date enthalten — noetig bei Datums-Kopplungsregeln mit Block-Tagen hinter dem Fenster (siehe Instructions). Datenschutz: IDs statt Namen verwenden. Antwort: {job_id, status}.

NameTypeReqDescription
payloadobjectyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the com.vigotime/planner MCP server?

com.vigotime/planner is a hosted endpoint at https://api.vigotime.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · api.vigotime.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-vigotime-planner 'https://api.vigotime.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the com.vigotime/planner MCP server?

com.vigotime/planner is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.vigotime/planner. Compute real duty rosters from your AI assistant - rule-based vigotime planner, API key or OAuth. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.vigotime.com/mcp).

Is the com.vigotime/planner MCP server safe to use?

com.vigotime/planner scores 89 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the com.vigotime/planner MCP server expose?

com.vigotime/planner exposes 6 tools: solve_submit, solve_status, solve_result, account_balance, service_info, example_payload. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 431 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the com.vigotime/planner MCP server require authentication?

Yes. com.vigotime/planner asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.

Is the com.vigotime/planner MCP server still maintained?

com.vigotime/planner is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the com.vigotime/planner MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on com.vigotime/planner, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.