com.verifyum/mcp
REMOTE · API.VERIFYUM.COM · SCANNED SEP 20
Privacy-preserving file proofs on Solana. Files are hashed locally. Currently free, no API key.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: signatures are present but failed validation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability77
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 502 tokens (~167/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management67
- Stability observed for 20 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the com.verifyum/mcp server?
com.verifyum/mcp is a hosted endpoint at https://api.verifyum.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · api.verifyum.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-verifyum-mcp 'https://api.verifyum.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-verifyum-mcp": {
"url": "https://api.verifyum.com/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"com-verifyum-mcp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://api.verifyum.com/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.com-verifyum-mcp] url = "https://api.verifyum.com/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"com-verifyum-mcp": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://api.verifyum.com/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add com-verifyum-mcp --url 'https://api.verifyum.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
com-verifyum-mcp:
url: "https://api.verifyum.com/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"com-verifyum-mcp": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://api.verifyum.com/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add com-verifyum-mcp -t streamable-http -u 'https://api.verifyum.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-verifyum-mcp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://api.verifyum.com/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 14 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 10 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 8 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 5 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://api.verifyum.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=*.verifyum.com | CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 29 Aug 2026 | 27 Nov 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 630baf99b8dc8b35f7810157a9a6a8001c7 |
| SANs: *.verifyum.com, verifyum.com | ||||||
| CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC bogus
Validation of api.verifyum.com. — Bogus
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| verifyum.com. | present | 17881, 17881 | 15, 15 | Verified |
| api.verifyum.com. | Bogus address RRset signature failed verification |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000 |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://api.verifyum.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://api.verifyum.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
verifyum_anchor_commitment Anchor a prepared Verifyum commitment ~200
Submit one locally calculated Verifyum version 2 commitment. Accepts only the commitment and an idempotency key. Never send a file, filename, raw file hash, nonce or private manifest. The caller must hash the file and build the private manifest on its own machine first, as documented at https://verifyum.com/agents. This creates a real public transaction on Solana Mainnet. Public use is currently free and the network fee is currently paid by AI SENSE AS. That is a current service policy, not a permanent pricing guarantee. Create proofs only on clear user intent, never speculatively, in bulk, or as a hidden side effect. When retrying, reuse the exact same commitment and idempotency key.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| commitment | string | yes | sha256: followed by 64 lowercase hexadecimal characters |
| idempotency_key | string | yes | 16 to 128 URL-safe characters, reused verbatim on retries |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
verifyum_get_proof Get Verifyum proof status ~54
Read the lifecycle state of one Verifyum proof (queued, submitted, finalized or failed). Input is a public proof ID only.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| proof_id | string | yes | A canonical 26-character Verifyum proof ID |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
verifyum_verify_public_proof Verify a public Verifyum proof ~146
Check a finalized proof: metadata consistency, the exact 128-byte memo, and the Ed25519 service signature against the published key registry. The response also contains the exact Solana RPC call and expectations so the caller can independently confirm the transaction on chain, because this hosted check is performed by the Verifyum service itself. A finalized Verifyum anchor demonstrates that a commitment to exact file bytes existed no later than the estimated Solana block time. It does not prove authorship, ownership, legal signature validity, when the file was first created, or whether statements inside the file are true.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| proof_id | string | yes | A canonical 26-character Verifyum proof ID |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the com.verifyum/mcp server?
com.verifyum/mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as com.verifyum/mcp. Privacy-preserving file proofs on Solana. Files are hashed locally. Currently free, no API key. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.verifyum.com/mcp).
Is the com.verifyum/mcp server safe to use?
com.verifyum/mcp scores 82 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the com.verifyum/mcp server expose?
com.verifyum/mcp exposes 3 tools: verifyum_get_proof, verifyum_verify_public_proof, verifyum_anchor_commitment. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 400 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the com.verifyum/mcp server require authentication?
No. We connected to com.verifyum/mcp without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the com.verifyum/mcp server still maintained?
com.verifyum/mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.