VaultRubric
REMOTE · VAULTRUBRIC.COM
Sourced, scored comparisons of crypto exchanges, wallets, savings accounts and brokerages.
Available components
Last scanned (4 hours ago)
Scores higher than 68% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 24 Oct 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability75
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 1036 tokens (~94/item across 11 items; 11 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management40
- Stability observed for 12 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 11 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 12 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 24 Oct 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “list_categories” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Oct 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 12 Oct 26 70
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 24 Oct 2026 · Probed https://vaultrubric.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=vaultrubric.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 10 Oct 2026 | 9 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 5cf4e821d445f01e134e2b0619a776c1 |
| SANs: vaultrubric.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of vaultrubric.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| vaultrubric.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://vaultrubric.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://vaultrubric.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://vaultrubric.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
calculate_savings_interest Calculate Savings Interest ~89
Project interest on a balance over N months at every high-yield savings account VaultRubric tracks, using sourced standard APYs (promos shown separately), minimum balances and monthly fees. Estimates, not advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| balance | number | yes | Deposit balance in USD, e.g. 10000 |
| months | number | – | Holding period in months (1-120); default 12 |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| attribution | string | yes | Always 'Source: VaultRubric (vaultrubric.com)'; include when citing. |
| balance | number | – | – |
| disclaimer | string | – | – |
| license | string | – | Data license / reuse terms |
| method | string | – | – |
| methodology | string | – | URL of the scoring methodology |
| months | integer | – | – |
| page | string | yes | Shareable calculator URL for this result |
| results | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
check_platform_safety Check Platform Safety ~60
Safety record for a platform: customer-funds hacks, incidents, regulatory actions and security score, with sources and the safety page URL.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| platform | string | yes | Platform name, e.g. 'Coinbase', 'Ledger', 'Robinhood' |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| answer | string | yes | One-paragraph direct answer |
| attribution | string | yes | Always 'Source: VaultRubric (vaultrubric.com)'; include when citing. |
| category | string | – | – |
| caveat | string | – | – |
| customer_funds_hack | – | – | – |
| incidents_and_regulatory | array | – | – |
| license | string | – | Data license / reuse terms |
| methodology | string | – | URL of the scoring methodology |
| platform | string | yes | – |
| related_comparisons | array | – | – |
| safety_page | string | – | – |
| security_criterion | object|null | – | – |
No examples provided.
compare_platforms Compare Platforms ~122
Compare 2-6 platforms in one category with optional criterion weights. Applies VaultRubric's 75% coverage gate, 60% hack cap and too-close-to-call (<3 points) rules.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| platforms | array | yes | 2-6 platform names from the same category, e.g. ['Coinbase', 'Kraken'] |
| weights | object | – | Optional importance 0-10 per criterion key (keys from get_platform criteria, e.g. {'fees': 10, 'security': 8}); unspecified criteria default to 5 |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| attribution | string | yes | Always 'Source: VaultRubric (vaultrubric.com)'; include when citing. |
| category | string | yes | – |
| license | string | – | Data license / reuse terms |
| methodology | string | – | URL of the scoring methodology |
| note | string | – | – |
| page | string | yes | Most relevant VaultRubric page URL |
| results | array | yes | – |
| rules | string | – | – |
| too_close_to_call | array|null | – | – |
| weights | – | – | Weights applied (object) or 'equal (5 each)' |
| winner | string|null | – | Winning platform, or null if too close / none eligible |
No examples provided.
estimate_fees Estimate Fees ~147
Estimate annual cost at every brokerage or crypto exchange VaultRubric tracks from sourced fees (commissions, options per-contract, transfer-out; exchange taker fees). Unknown fees are flagged, never assumed.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| avg_trade_size | number | – | Average trade size in USD (used for exchange percentage fees); default 1000 |
| category | string | yes | 'brokerage' or 'exchange' |
| options_contracts_per_month | number | – | Options contracts per month (brokerages); default 0 |
| trades_per_month | number | – | Number of trades per month; default 4 |
| transfers_per_year | number | – | Full account transfers out per year; default 0 |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| attribution | string | yes | Always 'Source: VaultRubric (vaultrubric.com)'; include when citing. |
| category | string | – | – |
| disclaimer | string | – | – |
| inputs | object | – | – |
| license | string | – | Data license / reuse terms |
| method | string | – | – |
| methodology | string | – | URL of the scoring methodology |
| page | string | yes | Shareable calculator URL for this result |
| results | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_asset_news Get Asset News ~92
Delayed price and latest headlines (Google News, with source URLs) for a stock ticker or a top-250 crypto asset. Headlines are quoted as reported; no predictions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| asset | string | yes | Stock ticker (e.g. 'AAPL') or coin id/symbol/name (e.g. 'bitcoin', 'ETH') |
| kind | string | – | 'stock' (default) or 'crypto' |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| asset | string | yes | – |
| attribution | string | yes | Always 'Source: VaultRubric (vaultrubric.com)'; include when citing. |
| disclaimer | string | – | – |
| kind | string | – | – |
| license | string | – | Data license / reuse terms |
| methodology | string | – | URL of the scoring methodology |
| news | array | yes | – |
| page | string | – | – |
| quote | object | – | – |
No examples provided.
get_ipo_calendar Get IPO Calendar ~79
Upcoming and recently priced IPOs (Nasdaq IPO calendar) with price ranges, exchanges and first-day results, plus the latest SEC EDGAR S-1/F-1 filings.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| section | string | – | 'all' (default), 'upcoming', 'recent_priced', 'recently_filed' or 'sec_filings' |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| as_of | string | yes | – |
| attribution | string | yes | Always 'Source: VaultRubric (vaultrubric.com)'; include when citing. |
| disclaimer | string | – | – |
| license | string | – | Data license / reuse terms |
| methodology | string | – | URL of the scoring methodology |
| page | string | – | – |
| recent_priced | array | – | – |
| recently_filed | array | – | – |
| sec_filings | array | – | – |
| sources | object | – | – |
| upcoming | array | – | – |
No examples provided.
get_market_movers Get Market Movers ~108
Top crypto (24h, CoinGecko) or US stock (delayed, Yahoo/Nasdaq) gainers and losers, each with the latest sourced headline that names it. News and data only, not advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| direction | string | – | 'gainers', 'losers' or 'both' (default) |
| limit | integer | – | Rows per list, 1-8 (default 8) |
| market | string | yes | 'crypto' or 'stocks' |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| as_of | string | yes | – |
| attribution | string | yes | Always 'Source: VaultRubric (vaultrubric.com)'; include when citing. |
| delay | string | – | – |
| disclaimer | string | – | – |
| gainers | array | – | – |
| license | string | – | Data license / reuse terms |
| losers | array | – | – |
| market | string | yes | – |
| methodology | string | – | URL of the scoring methodology |
| page | string | – | – |
| source | string | – | – |
| source_url | string | – | – |
No examples provided.
get_platform Get Platform ~73
Full sourced record for one platform: per-criterion scores with basis and source URLs, incidents, regulatory actions, as-of dates, and related page URLs.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | Platform name as listed by search_platforms, e.g. 'Coinbase', 'Trezor Safe 5', 'Fidelity' |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| attribution | string | yes | Always 'Source: VaultRubric (vaultrubric.com)'; include when citing. |
| license | string | – | Data license / reuse terms |
| methodology | string | – | URL of the scoring methodology |
| note | string | – | – |
| platform | object | yes | Full platform record |
| related_comparisons | array | – | – |
| safety_page | string | – | URL of the 'Is X safe?' page, if any |
No examples provided.
get_verdict Get Verdict ~69
Get the published verdict (direct answer, key facts, as-of date, URL) for a VaultRubric comparison page.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | Comparison page slug, e.g. 'coinbase-vs-kraken', 'best-hardware-wallet', 'is-coinbase-safe' |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| attribution | string | yes | Always 'Source: VaultRubric (vaultrubric.com)'; include when citing. |
| license | string | – | Data license / reuse terms |
| methodology | string | – | URL of the scoring methodology |
| verdict | object | yes | – |
No examples provided.
list_categories List Categories ~38
List VaultRubric's public categories (high-yield savings, brokerages, crypto exchanges, hardware/software wallets) with platform counts and data URLs.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| attribution | string | yes | Always 'Source: VaultRubric (vaultrubric.com)'; include when citing. |
| categories | array | yes | – |
| data_generated | string | – | Date the data was generated (YYYY-MM-DD) |
| license | string | – | Data license / reuse terms |
| methodology | string | – | URL of the scoring methodology |
No examples provided.
search_platforms Search Platforms ~73
Search tracked platforms by name and/or category; returns VaultRubric score, data coverage and pick eligibility.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Optional category id to filter by |
| query | string | – | Name fragment to match, e.g. 'trezor' or 'coin'. Empty returns all (max 50). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| attribution | string | yes | Always 'Source: VaultRubric (vaultrubric.com)'; include when citing. |
| count | integer | yes | – |
| license | string | – | Data license / reuse terms |
| methodology | string | – | URL of the scoring methodology |
| results | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the VaultRubric MCP server?
VaultRubric is a hosted endpoint at https://vaultrubric.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · vaultrubric.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-vaultrubric-vaultrubric 'https://vaultrubric.com/mcp'
What is the VaultRubric MCP server?
VaultRubric is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.vaultrubric/vaultrubric. Sourced, scored comparisons of crypto exchanges, wallets, savings accounts and brokerages. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://vaultrubric.com/mcp).
Is the VaultRubric MCP server safe to use?
VaultRubric scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the VaultRubric MCP server expose?
VaultRubric exposes 11 tools: list_categories, search_platforms, get_platform, compare_platforms, get_verdict, and 6 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 950 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the VaultRubric MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to VaultRubric without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the VaultRubric MCP server still maintained?
VaultRubric is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.