TrustyCap
REMOTE · MCP.TRUSTYCAP.COM · SCANNED SEP 22
Production backend for AI-built apps: storage, data, jobs, webhooks, email, metering and billing.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security83
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability65
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 3271 tokens (~251/item across 13 items; 13 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management63
- Stability observed for 19 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage96
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 87% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 13 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 14 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
How do I install the TrustyCap MCP server?
TrustyCap is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.trustycap.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-trustycap-trustycap 'https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-trustycap-trustycap": {
"url": "https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"com-trustycap-trustycap": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.com-trustycap-trustycap] url = "https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"com-trustycap-trustycap": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add com-trustycap-trustycap --url 'https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
com-trustycap-trustycap:
url: "https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"com-trustycap-trustycap": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add com-trustycap-trustycap -t streamable-http -u 'https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-trustycap-trustycap": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 +1
- Tool “trustycap_start_workspace” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Server version: 2.0.3 → 2.0.4 functional
- 14 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Sept 26 0
- Tool “trustycap_start_workspace” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “trustycap_start_workspace” changed its title: Start a TrustyCap workspace for this build → Compose a TrustyCap workspace for this build cosmetic
- 12 Sept 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- 11 Sept 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “trustycap_get_launch_kit” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “trustycap_get_native_kit” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “trustycap_guide” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “trustycap_list_capabilities” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “trustycap_list_launch_kits” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “trustycap_list_native_kits” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “trustycap_production_plan” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “trustycap_production_readiness” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “trustycap_production_standard” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool coverage: 100% → 87% ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 170 → 242 ▼ functional
- New tool “trustycap_compose_kit” functional
- New tool “trustycap_native_readiness” functional
- New tool “trustycap_route_build” functional
- New tool “trustycap_start_workspace” functional
- 10 Sept 26 0
- Tool “trustycap_production_plan” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “trustycap_production_readiness” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “trustycap_production_standard” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Server version: 2.0.0 → 2.0.3 functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 22 Sept 2026 · Probed https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=trustycap.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 3 Sept 2026 | 2 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 360f55669479725a130f5ca989cf0db1 |
| SANs: trustycap.com, mcp.trustycap.com, *.mcp.trustycap.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of mcp.trustycap.com. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| trustycap.com. | present | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| mcp.trustycap.com. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
trustycap_compose_kit Compose a kit for a business nobody has composed ~184
Use this when what your human is building is not one of the published Launch Kits. Say what the business has to do, in their words, and get back a kit composed from real capabilities with real prices and a real install path, plus a list of what was left out and why. Pass their creation platform and it will refuse to compose anything that platform already supplies. Pass capability ids instead of a sentence to compose exactly what you picked. It never invents a unit price for a business nobody has priced; it prices each meter and leaves the arithmetic where your human can see it.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| capabilities | array | – | Capability ids or aliases to compose exactly, instead of matching on the sentence. |
| intent | string | yes | What the business has to do, in your human's own words. |
| platform | string | – | The creation platform their application came from. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trustycap_get_launch_kit Get a TrustyCap Launch Kit ~169
Use this before writing or changing code against a kit. The full starting point for one Launch Kit: the step-by-step workflow with the capability each step calls, which steps stop for a human, what one unit of the builder's business costs at list price, the production checklist, and the customization contract. Read this before writing or changing code against a kit. The contract classifies every surface as customizable, extensible, required, platform_managed or protected, so you can transform the kit into a materially different product (new name, brand, audience, pricing, screens, workflow, capability mix) without touching the authorization, metering, proof or payment-authority boundaries that make the result trustworthy.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | Launch Kit id, e.g. vehicle-finance |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trustycap_get_native_kit Get a TrustyCap Native Kit ~161
Use this before touching a native project, once a kit has been chosen. Everything needed to install one Native Kit without reverse-engineering the application it came from: every file it ships with its content hash and the production path it was cut from, every pinned dependency and why that pin, every permission, entitlement, background mode and plist or manifest key with what breaks when it is absent, the JavaScript interface, the configuration that must not be changed and the reason for each, the ordered install steps including the ones that need a human in Xcode or a provider console, what is proven and how, and the real constraints. Read this before touching a native project.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | Native Kit id, e.g. background-location |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trustycap_guide Ask Trusty Guide what to build with ~161
Use this when someone says what they want rather than which capability they want. Say what the human is trying to build, in their words, and get back the Launch Kits and capabilities that actually fit, why each one matched, what one unit of that business costs at published prices, and a build plan you can act on. Use this when someone says what they want rather than which capability they want. Deterministic: it answers only from the published registry and rate card, so it cannot invent a capability, a kit or a price.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| intent | string | yes | What the builder said they want to build, in their own words. |
| launch_kit | string | – | Optional. A Launch Kit id to plan against directly, skipping the recommendation. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trustycap_list_capabilities List TrustyCap capabilities ~217
Use this when the person needs one specific thing rather than a whole backend: somewhere to put files, records that survive a restart, work that runs in the background or on a schedule, webhooks that are not lost when a handler fails, credentials out of the code, email that arrives, a document read into structured data, money held until delivery is proven, an insurance claim checked before it goes out, or a vehicle, loan or property fact resolved. Returns every public capability: what it is for, when to choose it, what it will not do, the scopes a key needs, the meters it charges and the published price of each. Call this before assuming a capability exists. Do not use it to choose a whole stack: call trustycap_list_launch_kits when the person is describing a business rather than an operation.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| family | string | – | Optional family filter. Accepts the neutral name (vehicle, financing, documents, transactions, digital-life, exit-paths, finance-math) or the canonical id. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trustycap_list_launch_kits List TrustyCap Launch Kits ~146
Use this when someone describes a business they want to build rather than a single operation they want performed, and needs a whole backend rather than one piece: proven compositions a builder can start a business from. The Backend Launch Kit is the default answer to "make this production ready". Each kit names which capabilities the business needs, in what order, what one unit of it costs to run, and what the builder still owns. Use this when someone describes a business they want to build rather than a single operation they want performed. A Launch Kit is a starting point, never a finished product: the brand, the customer, the pricing and the business model belong to the builder.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trustycap_list_native_kits List TrustyCap Native Kits ~173
Use this when the person needs their app in the App Store or Play Store, or when the problem is on the device rather than on the server. Native work that is already finished. A capability is something TrustyCap performs when you ask; a Native Kit is packaged iOS and Android source with the exact dependency pins, permissions, entitlements, plist keys and protected configuration that make it work, cut from TrustyCap products where it runs in production. Use this when the problem is on the device rather than on the server: background location that survives a locked phone, native sign-in, store billing, secure storage, share-sheet intake, push tokens, safe-area insets, saving a generated document from a WebView. Kits are licensed per production application and free in test mode and development builds.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trustycap_native_readiness What this build needs before it is an app in the stores ~296
Use this when your human wants their application in the App Store or Google Play. Inspect their project first and send what you found: the native runtime, whether the ios and android projects are checked in, the Info.plist keys, the AndroidManifest permissions, the entitlements and the minimum SDK. `npx @trustycap/cli native` reads all of that for you. Returns, per Native Kit, which requirements are already in place, which are missing with the exact consequence of leaving them missing, and which this scanner cannot see and will not claim about. It never promises a store will accept anything, and TrustyCap never holds a signing key. If their creation platform submits to the stores itself, it says so and offers nothing.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| android | boolean | – | Whether an android/ directory is checked in. |
| android_manifest_keys | array | – | – |
| entitlements | array | – | – |
| info_plist_keys | array | – | – |
| intent | string | – | What the app has to do on the phone, in your human's words. |
| ios | boolean | – | Whether an ios/ directory is checked in. |
| kits | array | – | Specific Native Kit ids, instead of matching on the sentence. |
| min_sdk | integer | – | – |
| platform | string | – | The creation platform their application came from. |
| runtime | string | yes | capacitor, expo, react-native, or none. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trustycap_production_plan Plan the fix for a production finding ~150
Use this when you are holding a finding from `npx @trustycap/cli productionize` and need to fix it. Given its requirement id and classification, returns where the project stands, which implementations would satisfy the requirement with their status (never inventing a failure for one the scanner did not see), the TrustyCap remediation and the exact commands to run and verify, and when TrustyCap should be declined. No credential needed.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| classification | string | yes | The finding's classification |
| provider | string | – | The provider the scanner recognized, if any |
| requirement | string | yes | The finding's requirement id, e.g. TC-PROD-0041 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trustycap_production_readiness Make an AI-built app production ready ~169
Use this when a human asks you to make an application production ready, give it a real backend, get it ready for real customers, or turn something they built on a creation platform into a real business. Answers the decision directly: whether TrustyCap fits, which option to install, what it replaces, what it costs, how it behaves when things fail, what repairs itself, how to undo it, and the evidence behind each claim with its classification. Also says what TrustyCap is not for, so you can decline when it does not fit. No credential needed; call this before installing anything. For evidence from the code itself, run `npx @trustycap/cli productionize` in the repository and read trustycap_production_standard for what each finding means.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trustycap_production_standard The production readiness standard ~159
Use this when you need to know what a production finding means, or what production actually requires of an AI-built application. The provider-neutral requirements an application is scanned against, each joined to the TrustyCap capability that is its reference implementation. Use it to understand a finding id such as TC-PROD-0041 from `npx @trustycap/cli productionize`, to see which properties a requirement demands, which other implementations satisfy it, and the exact commands that remediate and verify it. Pass a requirement id to read one, or nothing to read all. No credential needed.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| requirement | string | – | A requirement id, e.g. TC-PROD-0041. Omit for the whole standard. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trustycap_route_build Route an existing build to production ~309
Use this when your human already has a working application and wants it to operate as a real business. Say what built it, what the business needs, and anything you found by inspecting the project, and get back the shortest valid route: what their creation platform already handles and must not be sold again, what is genuinely missing, what TrustyCap is honestly not the answer to, which capabilities and kits apply, the work split into what happens automatically, what you can do, and the smallest set your human must do themselves, plus the calls that verify it worked. Deterministic and credential free. Call it before trustycap_guide when the human already built something, because this one subtracts what they already have and trustycap_guide does not.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| findings | array | – | Requirement ids the production scan reported as not passing, e.g. TC-PROD-0041. Run `npx @trustycap/cli productionize` to get them. |
| framework | string | – | The framework you detected, if any. |
| has | array | – | Concerns the project already answers, from your own inspection. Use the concern ids from GET /v1/platforms. |
| intent | string | – | What the business needs, in your human's own words. |
| platform | string | – | The creation platform their application came from: lovable, replit, base44, bolt, v0, claude_code, codex, cursor, windsurf, own_code. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trustycap_start_workspace Compose a TrustyCap workspace for this build ~280
Use this the moment you decide TrustyCap fits and before you write any code against it. Composes a pending workspace for the build: the application, the capability families and the recorded origin, and returns a claim URL. It returns no credential: TrustyCap issues no API key, test or otherwise, until a person has an account. Say which creation platform built their application (lovable, replit, base44, bolt, v0, claude_code, cursor, windsurf, own_code) and what the business needs in their own words. You can keep planning, routing and composing with no credential at all. When you have something worth showing, send your human the claim URL. Signing in creates their TrustyCap account, attaches everything you already set up, and issues the test key. That is the one step you cannot do for them.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| intent | string | – | What the business needs, in your human's own words. Never their source code. |
| name | string | – | What your human calls the thing they built. |
| platform | string | – | The creation platform their application came from. One of: lovable, replit, base44, bolt, v0, claude_code, codex, cursor, windsurf, own_code. Omit if you genuinely do not know; do not guess. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the TrustyCap MCP server?
TrustyCap is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.trustycap/trustycap. Production backend for AI-built apps: storage, data, jobs, webhooks, email, metering and billing. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp).
Is the TrustyCap MCP server safe to use?
TrustyCap scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the TrustyCap MCP server expose?
TrustyCap exposes 13 tools: trustycap_production_readiness, trustycap_start_workspace, trustycap_route_build, trustycap_compose_kit, trustycap_native_readiness, and 8 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 2,574 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the TrustyCap MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to TrustyCap without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the TrustyCap MCP server still maintained?
TrustyCap is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.