Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

TrustyCap

REMOTE · MCP.TRUSTYCAP.COM

Production backend for AI-built apps: storage, data, jobs, webhooks, email, metering and billing.

0 this week 86 Trust /100

Last scanned (9 hours ago)

Scores higher than 92% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 7 Nov 2026.

Category Cloud Infrastructure

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security83
  • The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
  • No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
  • HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
  • The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
  • DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability63
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 3293 tokens (~253/item across 13 items; 13 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage96
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 87% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 13 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 14 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (13)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 6 Nov 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 4 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 6 Oct 26 86
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “trustycap_start_workspace” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
  • 3 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 2 Oct 26 0
    • Tool “trustycap_compose_kit” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “trustycap_get_launch_kit” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “trustycap_guide” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “trustycap_list_launch_kits” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • “trustycap_get_launch_kit” reworded the description of “id” cosmetic
    • “trustycap_guide” reworded the description of “launch_kit” cosmetic
    • Tool “trustycap_compose_kit” changed its title: Compose a kit for a business nobody has composed → Compose what a business needs cosmetic
    • Tool “trustycap_get_launch_kit” changed its title: Get a TrustyCap Launch Kit → Get an example business cosmetic
    • Tool “trustycap_list_launch_kits” changed its title: List TrustyCap Launch Kits → List example businesses cosmetic
  • 30 Sept 26 0
    • Tool “trustycap_production_standard” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “trustycap_production_readiness” changed its title: Make an AI-built app production ready → Make a working app production ready cosmetic
  • 29 Sept 26 0
    • Tool “trustycap_get_native_kit” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “trustycap_list_native_kits” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 7 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=trustycap.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 1 Nov 2026 30 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 18e2d1497e9b7c6c0e94323d58947939
SANs: trustycap.com, mcp.trustycap.com, *.mcp.trustycap.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC secure

Validation of mcp.trustycap.com. — Secure

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. DS published 19718 13 Verified
trustycap.com. DS published 2371 13 Verified
mcp.trustycap.com. Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy no-referrer

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp
MCP tools · 13 exposed · ~2,581 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
trustycap_compose_kit ~183

Use this when your human describes a business. Say what it has to do, in their words, and get back the capabilities it needs, composed, with real prices and a real install path, plus a list of what was left out and why. No example has to match first. Pass their creation platform and it will refuse to compose anything that platform already supplies. Pass capability ids instead of a sentence to compose exactly what you picked. It never invents a unit price for a business nobody has priced; it prices each meter and leaves the arithmetic where your human can see it.

NameTypeReqDescription
capabilitiesarray–Capability ids or aliases to compose exactly, instead of matching on the sentence.
intentstringyesWhat the business has to do, in your human's own words.
platformstring–The creation platform their application came from.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

trustycap_get_launch_kit ~152

Use this before writing or changing code from an example. The whole example: the step-by-step workflow with the capability each step calls, which steps stop for a human, what one unit of the builder's business costs at list price, the production checklist, and the customization contract. The contract classifies every surface as customizable, extensible, required, platform_managed or protected, so you can transform the example into a materially different product (new name, brand, audience, pricing, screens, workflow, capability mix) without touching the authorization, metering, proof or payment-authority boundaries that make the result trustworthy.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesComposition id, e.g. vehicle-finance

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

trustycap_get_native_kit ~182

Use this before touching a native project, once a kit has been chosen. One Native Kit's full manifest, so nobody has to reverse-engineer the application it came from: every file in its packaged source with its content hash and the production path it was cut from, every pinned dependency and why that pin, every permission, entitlement, background mode and plist or manifest key with what breaks when it is absent, the JavaScript interface, the configuration that must not be changed and the reason for each, the ordered install steps including the ones that need a human in Xcode or a provider console, what is proven and how, and the real constraints. The packaged source itself is not distributed yet, and no kit carries a price. Read this before touching a native project.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesNative Kit id, e.g. background-location

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

trustycap_guide ~173

Use this when someone says what they want rather than which capability they want. Say what the human is trying to build, in their words, and get back the published compositions and capabilities that actually fit, why each one matched, what one unit of that business costs at published prices, and a build plan you can act on. Use this when someone says what they want rather than which capability they want. Deterministic: it answers only from the published registry and rate card, so it cannot invent a capability, a composition or a price.

NameTypeReqDescription
intentstringyesWhat the builder said they want to build, in their own words.
launch_kitstring–Optional. The id of a published composition (GET /v1/launch-kits) to plan against directly, skipping the recommendation.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

trustycap_list_capabilities ~217

Use this when the person needs one specific thing rather than a whole backend: somewhere to put files, records that survive a restart, work that runs in the background or on a schedule, webhooks that are not lost when a handler fails, credentials out of the code, email that arrives, a document read into structured data, money held until delivery is proven, an insurance claim checked before it goes out, or a vehicle, loan or property fact resolved. Returns every public capability: what it is for, when to choose it, what it will not do, the scopes a key needs, the meters it charges and the published price of each. Call this before assuming a capability exists. Do not use it to choose a whole stack: call trustycap_list_launch_kits when the person is describing a business rather than an operation.

NameTypeReqDescription
familystring–Optional family filter. Accepts the neutral name (vehicle, financing, documents, transactions, digital-life, exit-paths, finance-math) or the canonical id.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

trustycap_list_launch_kits ~117

Worked examples of what a kind of business uses: which capabilities, in what order, what one unit of it costs to run, and what the builder still owns. Optional reading: a described business is composed without one (trustycap_compose_kit). For "make this production ready", the backend install contract is the default. An example is a starting point, never a finished product: the brand, the customer, the pricing and the business model belong to the builder. The tool's name keeps a legacy identifier.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

trustycap_list_native_kits ~182

Use this when the person needs their app in the App Store or Play Store, or when the problem is on the device rather than on the server. Native work that is already finished. A capability is something TrustyCap performs when you ask; a Native Kit is packaged iOS and Android source with the exact dependency pins, permissions, entitlements, plist keys and protected configuration that make it work, cut from TrustyCap products where it runs in production. Use this when the problem is on the device rather than on the server: background location that survives a locked phone, native sign-in, store billing, secure storage, share-sheet intake, push tokens, safe-area insets, saving a generated document from a WebView. Each kit is described by a public manifest. The packaged source is not distributed yet, and no kit carries a price.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

trustycap_native_readiness ~296

Use this when your human wants their application in the App Store or Google Play. Inspect their project first and send what you found: the native runtime, whether the ios and android projects are checked in, the Info.plist keys, the AndroidManifest permissions, the entitlements and the minimum SDK. `npx @trustycap/cli native` reads all of that for you. Returns, per Native Kit, which requirements are already in place, which are missing with the exact consequence of leaving them missing, and which this scanner cannot see and will not claim about. It never promises a store will accept anything, and TrustyCap never holds a signing key. If their creation platform submits to the stores itself, it says so and offers nothing.

NameTypeReqDescription
androidboolean–Whether an android/ directory is checked in.
android_manifest_keysarray––
entitlementsarray––
info_plist_keysarray––
intentstring–What the app has to do on the phone, in your human's words.
iosboolean–Whether an ios/ directory is checked in.
kitsarray–Specific Native Kit ids, instead of matching on the sentence.
min_sdkinteger––
platformstring–The creation platform their application came from.
runtimestringyescapacitor, expo, react-native, or none.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

trustycap_production_plan ~150

Use this when you are holding a finding from `npx @trustycap/cli productionize` and need to fix it. Given its requirement id and classification, returns where the project stands, which implementations would satisfy the requirement with their status (never inventing a failure for one the scanner did not see), the TrustyCap remediation and the exact commands to run and verify, and when TrustyCap should be declined. No credential needed.

NameTypeReqDescription
classificationstringyesThe finding's classification
providerstring–The provider the scanner recognized, if any
requirementstringyesThe finding's requirement id, e.g. TC-PROD-0041

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

trustycap_production_readiness ~169

Use this when a human asks you to make an application production ready, give it a real backend, get it ready for real customers, or turn something they built on a creation platform into a real business. Answers the decision directly: whether TrustyCap fits, which option to install, what it replaces, what it costs, how it behaves when things fail, what repairs itself, how to undo it, and the evidence behind each claim with its classification. Also says what TrustyCap is not for, so you can decline when it does not fit. No credential needed; call this before installing anything. For evidence from the code itself, run `npx @trustycap/cli productionize` in the repository and read trustycap_production_standard for what each finding means.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

trustycap_production_standard ~157

Use this when you need to know what a production finding means, or what production actually requires of an application. The provider-neutral requirements an application is scanned against, each joined to the TrustyCap capability that is its reference implementation. Use it to understand a finding id such as TC-PROD-0041 from `npx @trustycap/cli productionize`, to see which properties a requirement demands, which other implementations satisfy it, and the exact commands that remediate and verify it. Pass a requirement id to read one, or nothing to read all. No credential needed.

NameTypeReqDescription
requirementstring–A requirement id, e.g. TC-PROD-0041. Omit for the whole standard.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

trustycap_route_build ~309

Use this when your human already has a working application and wants it to operate as a real business. Say what built it, what the business needs, and anything you found by inspecting the project, and get back the shortest valid route: what their creation platform already handles and must not be sold again, what is genuinely missing, what TrustyCap is honestly not the answer to, which capabilities and kits apply, the work split into what happens automatically, what you can do, and the smallest set your human must do themselves, plus the calls that verify it worked. Deterministic and credential free. Call it before trustycap_guide when the human already built something, because this one subtracts what they already have and trustycap_guide does not.

NameTypeReqDescription
findingsarray–Requirement ids the production scan reported as not passing, e.g. TC-PROD-0041. Run `npx @trustycap/cli productionize` to get them.
frameworkstring–The framework you detected, if any.
hasarray–Concerns the project already answers, from your own inspection. Use the concern ids from GET /v1/platforms.
intentstring–What the business needs, in your human's own words.
platformstring–The creation platform their application came from: lovable, replit, base44, bolt, v0, claude_code, codex, cursor, windsurf, own_code.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

trustycap_start_workspace ~294

Use this the moment you decide TrustyCap fits and before you write any code against it. Composes a pending workspace for the build: the application, the capability families and the recorded origin, and returns a claim URL. It returns no credential: TrustyCap issues no API key, test or otherwise, until a person whose developer access is approved claims it. Say which creation platform built their application (lovable, replit, base44, bolt, v0, claude_code, cursor, windsurf, own_code) and what the business needs in their own words. You can keep planning, routing and composing with no credential at all. Send your human the claim URL with the plan. Developer access is by application: they apply once at https://developers.trustycap.com/apply, and claiming after approval attaches everything you already set up and issues the test key. Those are the steps you cannot do for them.

NameTypeReqDescription
intentstring–What the business needs, in your human's own words. Never their source code.
namestring–What your human calls the thing they built.
platformstring–The creation platform their application came from. One of: lovable, replit, base44, bolt, v0, claude_code, codex, cursor, windsurf, own_code. Omit if you genuinely do not know; do not guess.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the TrustyCap MCP server?

TrustyCap is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.trustycap.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-trustycap-trustycap 'https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the TrustyCap MCP server?

TrustyCap is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.trustycap/trustycap. Production backend for AI-built apps: storage, data, jobs, webhooks, email, metering and billing. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.trustycap.com/mcp).

Is the TrustyCap MCP server safe to use?

TrustyCap scores 86 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the TrustyCap MCP server expose?

TrustyCap exposes 13 tools: trustycap_production_readiness, trustycap_start_workspace, trustycap_route_build, trustycap_compose_kit, trustycap_native_readiness, and 8 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 2,581 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the TrustyCap MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to TrustyCap without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the TrustyCap MCP server still maintained?

TrustyCap is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 7 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the TrustyCap MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on TrustyCap, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.