com.theartofservice/compliance-intelligence
REMOTE · API.THEARTOFSERVICE.COM · SCANNED AUG 20
Research 723 compliance frameworks, then find the course that helps a buyer act on them.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 20 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2346 tokens (~117/item across 20 items; 20 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management7
- Stability observed for 2 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage83
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 48% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Add this component to your MCP client. Where a client-specific snippet is available, pick your client below and copy it straight into your config; otherwise use the connection detail shown.
remote · api.theartofservice.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-theartofservice-compliance-intelligence https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp
[mcp_servers.com-theartofservice-compliance-intelligence] url = "https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"com-theartofservice-compliance-intelligence": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add com-theartofservice-compliance-intelligence --url https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
com-theartofservice-compliance-intelligence:
url: "https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp" {
"mcpServers": {
"com-theartofservice-compliance-intelligence": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Aug 26 0
- Tool “agent_list_crosswalk_pairs” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool coverage: 65% → 48% ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 1859 → 2346 ▼ functional
- Server version: Access 723 compliance frameworks, 20,766+ controls, and 345K+ cross-framework mappings. Query the compliance knowledge graph to research requirements, map controls across frameworks, and analyse coverage gaps. → Access 688 compliance frameworks, 21,539+ controls, and 397K+ cross-framework mappings. Query the compliance knowledge graph to research requirements, map controls across frameworks, and analyse coverage gaps. functional
- New tool “agent_buy_crosswalk” functional
- New tool “agent_combined_coverage” functional
- New tool “agent_crosswalk_provenance” functional
- New tool “agent_crosswalk_refuted” functional
- 19 Aug 26 0
- Schema quality: 1512 → 1859 ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 60% → 65% ▲ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- Server version: Access 723 compliance frameworks, 20,400+ controls, and 332K+ cross-framework mappings. Query the compliance knowledge graph to research requirements, map controls across frameworks, and analyse coverage gaps. → Access 723 compliance frameworks, 20,766+ controls, and 345K+ cross-framework mappings. Query the compliance knowledge graph to research requirements, map controls across frameworks, and analyse coverage gaps. functional
- New tool “agent_coverage_crosswalk” functional
- New tool “agent_list_crosswalk_pairs” functional
- 18 Aug 26 62
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Aug 2026 · Probed https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=api.theartofservice.com | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 15 Aug 2026 | 13 Nov 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5586105300a83566cfa1732f8c1c28a055e |
| SANs: api.theartofservice.com | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of api.theartofservice.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| theartofservice.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://api.theartofservice.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability.
agent_buy_crosswalk ~102
Get a checkout link for a crosswalk report Returns a payment link for the crosswalk between two frameworks. Released pairs are delivered immediately on payment; any other pair is built to order at the same price. This returns a LINK, it does not take payment. An agent hands the link to whoever it is acting for. No card details pass through the agent. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_combined_coverage ~118
What everything you already hold covers, together Give the frameworks an organisation already holds and one it needs. Returns what they cover TOGETHER, what each one adds that the others do not, and what none of them reaches. No organisation holds one certification, and the marginal number is the one worth knowing: a second and third certification often add far less than expected. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| holds | string | yes | – |
| target | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_courses_for_frameworks ~144
Find courses covering several standards at once Given two or more standards, returns courses that address ALL of them together, which is what an organisation running overlapping programmes actually needs. Example: frameworks='SOC 2,ISO 27001' returns courses on running both from one evidence set, rather than one course per standard. Falls back to reporting which standards have coverage if no single course spans them all. No authentication required. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| frameworks | string | yes | Comma-separated, e.g. 'SOC 2,ISO 27001' |
| limit | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_coverage_crosswalk ~210
What one framework already evidences of another Given a framework you already hold and one you are working toward, returns which of the target's controls your existing evidence already covers, which remain as gaps, and the reasoning for every claim. Example: source='SOC 2', target='ISO 27001:2022'. Mappings are derived judgements, not text lifted from either standard, and each has survived an adversarial verification pass. Where no mappings exist between the pair, the response says so explicitly rather than reporting zero coverage, because an absence of data is not a coverage of zero. No authentication required. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| min_confidence | string | – | high, medium or low |
| source | string | yes | Framework you already hold, e.g. 'SOC 2' |
| target | string | yes | Framework you are working toward, e.g. 'ISO 27001:2022' |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_coverage_report ~96
Get cross-framework coverage report for a framework Returns a coverage analysis showing how many controls in the given framework map to controls in every other framework. Includes total controls, mapped control counts, and coverage percentages per target framework. Use this to understand which frameworks overlap most and plan multi-framework strategies. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_cross_framework_map ~140
Map controls between two compliance frameworks Returns the complete control-to-control mapping between a source and target framework. Each mapping shows which source control maps to which target control(s). This enables multi-framework compliance: satisfy one control to cover requirements in both frameworks. Use exact framework names as returned by agent_search_frameworks. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| source | string | yes | Source framework name (e.g. 'ISO 27001:2022') |
| target | string | yes | Target framework name (e.g. 'NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0') |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_crosswalk_provenance ~138
How do you know this: the grounding behind a crosswalk's claims For any released framework pair, return the reasoning and the provenance behind its mappings: what document each control was verified against, when, who judged the mapping, on what date, and whether it survived an adversarial pass that argued against it. Free, no authentication. A claim you cannot check is worth nothing, so the checking is not the paid part. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| source | string | yes | – |
| target | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_crosswalk_refuted ~129
What was claimed and did not hold, with the reason The mappings that were proposed for a pair and then refuted, each with why it failed. Refuted mappings are kept in the graph rather than deleted, so what was rejected is as inspectable as what survived. This is the check worth running on any coverage claim: a crosswalk that never rejects anything is not being judged. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| source | string | yes | – |
| target | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_get_control ~100
Get detailed information about a specific control Returns full details for a single control by its code identifier: title, description, domain, and framework. Control codes are framework-specific (e.g. 'A.5.1' for ISO 27001, 'AC-1' for NIST 800-53). ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| code | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_get_control_cross_references ~102
Get cross-framework mappings for a control Returns all controls in other frameworks that map to the given control via MAPS_TO relationships. This is the core cross-framework mapping capability: use it to find equivalent controls across different compliance frameworks (e.g. NIST 800-53 equivalents of ISO 27001 controls). ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| code | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_get_course ~74
Get one course Full detail for a single course by product id, including every standard it covers and its purchase URL. Use after agent_search_courses to justify a recommendation. No authentication required. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| product_id | integer | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_get_framework ~83
Get detailed information about a compliance framework Returns comprehensive details about a specific compliance framework: description, jurisdiction, version, domains with control counts, and cross-framework mapping statistics. Use the exact framework name as returned by agent_search_frameworks. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_get_framework_controls ~110
Get all controls for a compliance framework Returns all controls belonging to a framework, optionally filtered by domain. Each control includes: code, title, description, and domain. For large frameworks (e.g. NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5), use the domain filter to narrow results. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | string | – | Filter controls by domain name |
| name | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_list_course_frameworks ~65
List standards the catalogue covers Every standard that has courses, with a course count each. Use this to discover valid values for the framework filter before searching. No authentication required. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_list_crosswalk_pairs ~137
Framework pairs with a released coverage crosswalk Lists the framework pairs that have a reviewed, signed-off coverage crosswalk, with the coverage figure for each. Call this before agent_coverage_crosswalk to find out which pairs return a number. A pair that is not listed here has not been through review. Asking for it returns an honest 'not released' rather than an unreviewed percentage. Any pair across the any framework pair in the graph can be built to order, one pair being one unit of work. No authentication required. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_platform_stats ~58
Get platform statistics Returns current platform statistics: total framework count, control count, cross-framework mapping count, and domain count. No authentication required. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_pricing_info ~68
Get API pricing and rate limit information Returns current API pricing tiers, monthly call limits, and (if authenticated) your current month's usage. Use this to understand costs before making API calls. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_search ~157
Full-text search across controls and frameworks Search the compliance knowledge graph using full-text search. Type 'controls' searches control titles and descriptions. Type 'frameworks' searches framework names and descriptions. Use specific compliance terms for best results (e.g. 'access control', 'encryption at rest', 'data breach notification'). ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | Maximum results to return |
| query | string | yes | Search query (e.g. 'access control', 'encryption at rest') |
| type | string | – | Search type: 'controls' for control titles/descriptions, 'frameworks' for framework names/descriptions |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_search_courses ~153
Search the course catalogue Find courses by need, framework, role or industry. Free-text search over the catalogue, optionally narrowed to a named standard. Examples: q='soc 2 evidence collection', q='first 90 days as CISO', q='data governance healthcare', or q='audit preparation' with framework='ISO 27001'. Returns up to 25 courses with a direct purchase URL. No authentication required. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| framework | string | – | Narrow to a standard, e.g. 'SOC 2' |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| q | string | yes | What the buyer needs to do |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_search_frameworks ~162
Search and list compliance frameworks Search the compliance knowledge graph for frameworks by name, keyword, or jurisdiction. Returns framework metadata including name, description, jurisdiction, domain count, control count, and mapping-partner count. Without a query, returns all frameworks. Use this as the starting point to discover available frameworks. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| jurisdiction | string | – | Filter by jurisdiction (e.g. 'International', 'Australia', 'United States', 'European Union') |
| limit | integer | – | Maximum frameworks to return |
| q | string | – | Search query to filter by name or keyword (e.g. 'ISO 27001', 'privacy', 'Australian') |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.