Intent Cloak: query-intent privacy for agents
REMOTE · TEXTFORAGENTS.COM
Query-intent privacy for agents: threshold cloaking with signed exposure receipts.
Available components
Last scanned (18 hours ago)
Scores higher than 45% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 22 Oct 2026.
Category Security
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 3 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability49
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 126 tokens (~42/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 22 Oct 26 56
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 22 Oct 2026 · Probed https://textforagents.com/products/intent-cloak-query-privacy/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=textforagents.com | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 15 Oct 2026 | 13 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 66d021cf7bcd281266ac6de4cea43642f85 |
| SANs: textforagents.com, www.textforagents.com | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of textforagents.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| textforagents.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
| permissions-policy | interest-cohort=(), geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=(), payment=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://textforagents.com/products/intent-cloak-query-privacy/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://textforagents.com/products/intent-cloak-query-privacy/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://textforagents.com/products/intent-cloak-query-privacy/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
cloak_run ~67
Run a task through the Intent Cloak and return answers, utility, prices and the signed exposure receipt. Same billing as POST /cloak.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cloaked | boolean | – | – |
| provider_kind | string | – | – |
| task | object | – | – |
| task_id | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
exposure_receipt ~32
Return the signed exposure receipt of your own last cloak_run for a task.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| task_id | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
verify_receipt ~27
Verify a signed receipt's HMAC signature (free).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| receipt | object | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Intent Cloak: query-intent privacy for agents MCP server?
Intent Cloak: query-intent privacy for agents is a hosted endpoint at https://textforagents.com/products/intent-cloak-query-privacy/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · textforagents.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-textforagents-intent-cloak-query-privacy 'https://textforagents.com/products/intent-cloak-query-privacy/mcp'
What is the Intent Cloak: query-intent privacy for agents MCP server?
Intent Cloak: query-intent privacy for agents is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.textforagents/intent-cloak-query-privacy. Query-intent privacy for agents: threshold cloaking with signed exposure receipts. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://textforagents.com/products/intent-cloak-query-privacy/mcp).
Is the Intent Cloak: query-intent privacy for agents MCP server safe to use?
Intent Cloak: query-intent privacy for agents scores 56 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Intent Cloak: query-intent privacy for agents MCP server expose?
Intent Cloak: query-intent privacy for agents exposes 3 tools: cloak_run, exposure_receipt, verify_receipt. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 126 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Intent Cloak: query-intent privacy for agents MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Intent Cloak: query-intent privacy for agents without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Intent Cloak: query-intent privacy for agents MCP server still maintained?
Intent Cloak: query-intent privacy for agents is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.