TexasRatedPros Rankings
REMOTE · WWW.TEXASRATEDPROS.COM
Texas service-company rankings, profiles, comparisons, score breakdowns, and methodology.
Available components
Last scanned (6 hours ago)
Scores higher than 9% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 24 Oct 2026.
Category Search and Retrieval
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not yet verified: we couldn't confirm whether this endpoint requires it. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability0
- Transport check failed: declared streamable-http, but the endpoint returned HTTP 402. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.Unverified
Unverified: 5 categories
Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 12 Oct 26 −63
- Endpoint reachability: reachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
- Stability: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Authorization: partial → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
- Schema quality: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 14 Sept 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 16 Aug 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 15 Aug 26 0
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 24 Oct 2026 · Probed https://www.texasratedpros.com/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=www.texasratedpros.com | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 10 Oct 2026 | 8 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 657744588dd806ff704315ee31a79722f9f |
| SANs: www.texasratedpros.com | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of www.texasratedpros.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| texasratedpros.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication Inconclusive
We could not reach the endpoint well enough to judge its authorisation posture.
| Result | Inconclusive |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 402 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.texasratedpros.com/api/mcp | HTTP error | 402 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.texasratedpros.com/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://www.texasratedpros.com/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare_businesses Compare companies ~72
Compare two to four companies side by side, pillar by pillar, with a one-sentence verdict naming which pillar separates them.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Optional category slug selecting a shared ranking context |
| metro | string | – | Optional metro slug selecting a shared ranking context |
| slugs | array | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| availableContexts | array | yes | – |
| companies | array | yes | – |
| context | – | yes | – |
| pillarComparison | array | yes | – |
| provenance | object | yes | – |
| requiresContext | boolean | yes | – |
| verdict | string | yes | One sentence naming the leader and why |
No examples provided.
get_business_profile Get a company profile ~65
Everything published about one company: score breakdown by pillar, what was verified and with which authority, what could not be verified, review figures with the date they were read, and every ranking it appears in.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | Company slug from a ranking or search result |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | – | yes | – |
| corrections | array | yes | – |
| disclosures | array | yes | – |
| establishedOn | – | yes | – |
| establishedSource | – | yes | Which record the founding date came from |
| googleRating | – | yes | – |
| googleReviewCount | number | yes | – |
| legalName | – | yes | – |
| name | string | yes | – |
| notVerified | array | yes | Checklist items this company does not hold |
| ownerResponseRate | – | yes | – |
| phone | – | yes | – |
| pillars | array | yes | – |
| provenance | object | yes | – |
| rankings | array | yes | – |
| ratingDistribution | – | yes | Counts per star, 1 through 5 |
| region | – | yes | – |
| scoreBand | – | yes | – |
| slug | string | yes | – |
| trpScore | – | yes | – |
| verifications | array | yes | – |
| website | – | yes | – |
| yearsInBusiness | – | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_methodology Get the ranking methodology ~40
The exact weights, thresholds, eligibility rules, data sources, and stated limitations behind every score. Read this before characterising what a TRP Score means.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dataSources | array | yes | – |
| effectiveDate | – | yes | – |
| eligibility | object | yes | – |
| limitations | array | yes | – |
| pillars | array | yes | – |
| provenance | object | yes | – |
| ranking | object | yes | – |
| reputation | object | yes | – |
| scoreBands | array | yes | – |
| summary | string | yes | – |
| version | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_rankings Get a ranking ~104
The ranked list of independent companies for one category in one metropolitan area, with scores, verification status, and the reasons any tracked company is unranked. Franchise and chain locations are excluded by editorial policy.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | yes | Category slug, e.g. house-cleaning |
| include_bubble | boolean | – | Include eligible companies below the published cap |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| metro | string | yes | Metro slug, e.g. austin |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bubble | array | yes | Eligible companies below the published cap; scores shown, ranks withheld |
| category | object | yes | – |
| companies | array | yes | – |
| excludedBrands | array | yes | – |
| franchisesExcluded | number | yes | – |
| marketMedianRating | – | yes | – |
| metro | object | yes | – |
| provenance | object | yes | – |
| reviewsAnalyzed | number | yes | – |
| totalRanked | number | yes | – |
| totalTracked | number | yes | – |
| updatedAt | – | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_score_breakdown Get a score breakdown ~64
Return one company's score in one metro/category ranking, including rank, all five weighted pillars, each pillar's point contribution, and provenance.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Category slug |
| metro | string | – | Metro slug |
| slug | string | yes | Company slug |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| business | object | yes | – |
| context | object | yes | – |
| outOf | number | yes | – |
| pillars | array | yes | – |
| provenance | object | yes | – |
| rank | – | yes | – |
| scoreBand | string | yes | – |
| trpScore | number | yes | – |
No examples provided.
list_categories List service categories ~30
Every service category the site ranks, with a note on what Texas does and does not license for that trade.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| categories | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
list_metros List metropolitan areas ~37
The metropolitan areas with published rankings, and which service categories each one covers. Call this first to learn the slugs the other tools expect.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| metros | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
search_businesses Search companies ~81
Find tracked companies by name, metropolitan area, category, or minimum score.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| metro | string | – | – |
| min_score | number | – | – |
| query | string | – | Part of a company name |
| verified_only | boolean | – | Only companies matched to a state entity record |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | object | yes | – |
| results | array | yes | – |
| total | number | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the TexasRatedPros Rankings MCP server?
TexasRatedPros Rankings is a hosted endpoint at https://www.texasratedpros.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.texasratedpros.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-texasratedpros-rankings 'https://www.texasratedpros.com/api/mcp'
What is the TexasRatedPros Rankings MCP server?
TexasRatedPros Rankings is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.texasratedpros/rankings. Texas service-company rankings, profiles, comparisons, score breakdowns, and methodology. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.texasratedpros.com/api/mcp).
Is the TexasRatedPros Rankings MCP server safe to use?
TexasRatedPros Rankings scores 25 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the TexasRatedPros Rankings MCP server expose?
TexasRatedPros Rankings exposes 8 tools: list_metros, list_categories, get_rankings, get_business_profile, search_businesses, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 493 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the TexasRatedPros Rankings MCP server require authentication?
Its publisher declares no required credentials for TexasRatedPros Rankings. We have not been able to confirm that against the live endpoint, and a server can require authorisation without declaring it here.
Is the TexasRatedPros Rankings MCP server still maintained?
TexasRatedPros Rankings is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.