Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Taskhold

REMOTE · TASKHOLD.COM

Shared task list for Claude Code, Cursor and Codex: live progress per step, questions you answer.

Available components

+5 this week 83 Trust /100

Last scanned (4 hours ago)

Scores higher than 87% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Project Management

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security97
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 4247 tokens (~193/item across 22 items; 22 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management33
  • Stability observed for 10 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 22 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 23 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • Server version: 1.5.5 → 1.5.6 functional
  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 0
    • Server version: 1.5.4 → 1.5.5 functional
  • 31 Oct 26 +3
    • Authorization: fail → pass ▲ security
    • First check of Authorization: pass security
    • New tool “taskhold_update_project”, which the server declares destructive security
    • Tool “taskhold_add_note” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_begin” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_block” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_complete” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_create” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_create_from_todo” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_create_project” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_get” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_get_current” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_get_summary” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_list” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_list_labels” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_list_projects” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_plan” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_progress” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_search” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_set_priority” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_start” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_unblock” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_update” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_updates” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_plan” is now declared destructive security
    • Tool “taskhold_update” is now declared destructive security
    • Schema quality: 126 → 193 ▼ functional
    • Schema quality: good → excellent functional
    • Server version: 1.2.0 → 1.5.4 functional
    • “taskhold_block” added an optional parameter “if_no_answer” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_block” added an optional parameter “options” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_block” added an optional parameter “recommended” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_complete” added an optional parameter “finish_task” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_complete” added an optional parameter “needs_review” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_complete” added an optional parameter “outcome” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_create_from_todo” added an optional parameter “labels” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_create_from_todo” added an optional parameter “priority” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_search” added an optional parameter “project_id” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_begin” reworded the description of “labels” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_complete” reworded the description of “summary” cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_add_note” changed its title: Add a note cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_begin” changed its title: Begin a task cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_block” changed its title: Block a task with a question cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_complete” changed its title: Complete a task cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_create” changed its title: Create a task cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_create_from_todo” changed its title: Create a task from a TODO cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_create_project” changed its title: Create a project cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_get” changed its title: Get a task cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_get_current” changed its title: Get current tasks cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_get_summary” changed its title: Get a summary cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_list” changed its title: List tasks cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_list_labels” changed its title: List labels cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_list_projects” changed its title: List projects cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_plan” changed its title: Plan task steps cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_progress” changed its title: Report progress cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_search” changed its title: Search tasks cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_set_priority” changed its title: Set priority cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_start” changed its title: Start a task cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_unblock” changed its title: Unblock a task cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_update” changed its title: Edit a task cosmetic
    • Tool “taskhold_updates” changed its title: Get the person's updates cosmetic
  • 30 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_start” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_add_note” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_block” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_complete” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_create” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_get” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_get_current” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_list” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_list_projects” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_plan” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_progress” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_search” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_unblock” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_updates” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
    • New tool “taskhold_begin” functional
    • New tool “taskhold_create_project” functional
    • “taskhold_complete” added an optional parameter “start_next” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_create” added an optional parameter “project” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_create_from_todo” added an optional parameter “project” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_get_current” added an optional parameter “project” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_list” added an optional parameter “project” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_search” added an optional parameter “project” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_update” added an optional parameter “project” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_updates” added an optional parameter “project” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_updates” added an optional parameter “task_id” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_updates” added an optional parameter “wait” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_complete” reworded the description of “summary” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_create” reworded the description of “project_id” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_list” reworded the description of “project_id” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_progress” reworded the description of “task_id” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_start” reworded the description of “agent” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_update” reworded the description of “project_id” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_updates” reworded the description of “include_agent” cosmetic
    • “taskhold_updates” reworded the description of “since” cosmetic
  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “taskhold_block” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
    • “taskhold_block” reworded the description of “reason” cosmetic
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://taskhold.com/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=taskhold.com CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 8 Oct 2026 6 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6c8d6adb7cc3c0241ad82e5103328f66208
SANs: taskhold.com, www.taskhold.com
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of taskhold.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
taskhold.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Enforced and verified

The endpoint asked for a token and published valid RFC 9728 metadata describing how to get one.

Result Enforced and verified
Enforced On tool calls
HTTP status 200

WWW-Authenticate challenge Bearer resource_metadata="https://taskhold.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource"

Bearer resource_metadata="https://taskhold.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource"
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin

Protected resource metadata

Document https://taskhold.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource
Retrieved Yes
Resource https://taskhold.com/api/mcp
Authorisation server https://taskhold.com

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://taskhold.com/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://taskhold.com/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://taskhold.com/api/mcp
MCP tools · 22 exposed · ~3,873 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
taskhold_add_note ~92

Add a note to a task: findings, decisions, what you tried. The person reads these. Notes are append-only and shown oldest first (taskhold_get shows the latest 10). Returns a one-line confirmation; an unknown task_id fails with "Task not found".

NameTypeReqDescription
notestringyesThe note
task_idstringyesThe ID of the task to add a note to

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_begin ~394

Start work in one call: files a new task (or takes an existing one with task_id), plans its steps, marks it in progress and starts the first step. Use this whenever the person asks for something: it puts the request on their board with a checklist and a progress bar. Returns the task id, the numbered steps with ids, the step now running and a cursor for taskhold_updates. Every event of the call (created, planned, started) carries the agent label. On a task already under way it appends the steps. Fails without title or task_id, on an unknown task_id (get one from taskhold_list) or on a step (begin its parent, or taskhold_start the step).

NameTypeReqDescription
agentstring–Who is working, shown to the person: "<client> in <repo folder>", e.g. "Claude Code in api-server". Outside a repo just "Claude Code".
descriptionstring–Details (markdown), e.g. the person's request in full
labelsarray–Labels for a new task, e.g. ["bug", "refactor"]
prioritystring–Priority of a new task (default medium)
projectstring–Project name, e.g. the repo folder ("api-server"). Matched case-insensitively; created on first use. Use this instead of project_id.
start_first_stepboolean–Also start the first step (default true)
stepsarray–The plan, in order, e.g. ["Read the code", "Write the migration", "Add tests"]. Omit for a one-step job.
task_idstring–Begin an existing task instead of filing a new one (from taskhold_list).
titlestring–Title of the new task (the person's request, short). Omit when passing task_id.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_block ~371

Mark a task (or step) blocked when you can't continue without the person (a decision, missing info, access). Returns the question and the exact taskhold_updates call to wait with. Write the reason as one question they can answer from the board in a line, e.g. "Decide: drop the legacy column or keep it nullable?". When the answer is a choice, pass 2-4 short options (and recommended, the index of the one you'd pick, 0 = first): the person answers with one tap and the reply reads Reply to "<question>": chose "<option>". if_no_answer says what you'll do if nobody answers. The board shows it under Needs you and their reply arrives as a note. Then wait for it with taskhold_updates {task_id, since, wait: 50}; keep working on anything that doesn't depend on it meanwhile. If the reply doesn't settle it, block again with a narrower question; don't guess. Blocking an already-blocked task asks the new question instead, and the earlier question stays in the task's history; an unknown task_id fails with "Task not found".

NameTypeReqDescription
if_no_answerstring–What you will do if nobody answers, e.g. "I'll use SQLite and keep going in 30 min."
optionsarray–2-4 short choices shown as buttons, e.g. ["Postgres", "SQLite", "Ask me later"]. Omit for an open question.
reasonstringyesOne answerable question, e.g. "Approve: deploy the migration to staging now?"
recommendedinteger–Index into options of the one you recommend (0 = the first). Marked on the board.
task_idstringyesThe ID of the task to block

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_complete ~423

Mark a task or step done, with a summary of what you did and, optionally, a structured outcome: files changed (with +/- line counts), checks run (pass/fail/skip), links (PR, commit, branch, deploy, doc), follow-up task ids, risks and how the person can verify it. The person sees it as a What changed card; a step's outcome rolls up to its task. When the person should look at the work, pass needs_review: true with outcome.verify (how you checked it): the task lands in their Ready for review queue. Completing a step tells you the next one; start_next: true also starts it, and finish_task: true on the last open step closes the task too (with the same summary) in one call. For a step it returns steps done, the task's bar and the next step's id (or, after the last step, a reminder to complete the task). Completing a task closes its open steps. Repeating it on a task that is already done changes nothing and keeps the first summary (add more with taskhold_add_note); an unknown task_id fails with "Task not found", an invalid outcome fails without changing anything.

NameTypeReqDescription
finish_taskboolean–When completing the last open step, also complete its task with this summary (default false)
needs_reviewboolean–Ask the person to review the work: the task goes to their Ready for review queue (it still counts as done). Needs outcome.verify, a short "how I checked it" line. They approve it or request changes;…
outcomeobject–What changed, shown to the person as a What changed card (20 KB max). Every field is optional.
start_nextboolean–When completing a step, start the next step too (default false)
summarystring–What was done (and how you checked it). Markdown.
task_idstringyesThe ID of the task to complete

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_create ~244

File work for later: a bug, a refactor, a follow-up you aren't doing now (it lands in To Do). To file and start work at once, use taskhold_begin. Pass parent_task_id to add one step to an existing task (taskhold_plan for several). Returns the new id, status (todo) and priority. Fails if parent_task_id isn't found or is itself a step (steps don't nest), if project_id doesn't exist (pass project by name instead), or at the account's task ceiling.

NameTypeReqDescription
descriptionstring–Details (markdown)
labelsarray–Labels, e.g. ["bug", "refactor"]
parent_task_idstring–Make it a step (subtask) of this top-level task
prioritystring–Priority (default medium)
projectstring–Project name, e.g. the repo folder ("api-server"). Matched case-insensitively; created on first use. Use this instead of project_id.
project_idstring–Project id (project, a name, is easier)
titlestringyesTask title

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_create_from_todo ~209

Create a task from a TODO comment in code, keeping the file path and line number (label todo-from-code plus any labels you pass; priority as in taskhold_create; use taskhold_create for anything else). Returns the new task with its id and code location. Fails at the account's task ceiling or on an invalid project name.

NameTypeReqDescription
descriptionstring–Extra context from the code
file_pathstringyesPath of the file containing the TODO
labelsarray–More labels besides todo-from-code, e.g. ["bug"]
line_numberintegeryesLine number of the TODO
prioritystring–Priority (default medium; low unless it's a real bug)
projectstring–Project name, e.g. the repo folder ("api-server"). Matched case-insensitively; created on first use. Use this instead of project_id.
titlestringyesTask title from the TODO

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_create_project ~169

Create a project (a group of tasks, usually one per repo). Optional: any tool that takes project creates it on first use. Returns the existing project if one has this name (case-insensitive), without changing it: the reply says if your description or color wasn't applied (taskhold_update_project changes them). Says whether it was created, restored or already existed, plus its id. Fails on an invalid name or at the account's project ceiling (the error says what to do).

NameTypeReqDescription
colorstring–Hex color for the board, e.g. "#2f6fdb" (default: picked from the name)
descriptionstring–One line about it
namestringyesProject name, e.g. the repo folder ("api-server")

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_get ~130

Get one task with its full description, steps (subtasks), progress, labels and the latest notes. Returns status, priority, project, the numbered steps with ids (each with its description and, once done, its summary), up to 10 latest notes, the completion summary and what changed (files, checks, links, risks, how to verify) when it was reported. An unknown task_id fails with "Task not found"; get a valid id from taskhold_list (status "all") or taskhold_search.

NameTypeReqDescription
task_idstringyesThe ID of the task to retrieve

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_get_current ~147

Get the task in progress (in this project when you pass project), with its steps and the next one to do. Call this at the start of a session. Returns the most recently active in-progress task, its numbered steps with ids (with descriptions and the summaries of done steps), the next step's id and the latest 3 notes (taskhold_get shows 10); with nothing in progress (or an unknown project) it says so and names taskhold_begin and taskhold_list.

NameTypeReqDescription
projectstring–Project name, e.g. the repo folder ("api-server"). Matched case-insensitively (or a project id). An unknown name matches nothing.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_get_summary ~43

Task counts by status, priority and who added them (human or agent). Returns the total and one list per grouping; counts top-level tasks only, not steps.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_list ~164

List top-level tasks, one line each, grouped by status. Pass project to see one repo's work. Each line has status, title, steps done, progress and id; steps aren't listed (taskhold_get shows them). An unknown project name returns no tasks and is not created.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger–Max tasks to return (default 20)
prioritystring–Filter by priority
projectstring–Project name, e.g. the repo folder ("api-server"). Matched case-insensitively (or a project id). An unknown name matches nothing.
project_idstring–Filter by project id (project, a name, is easier)
statusstring–Filter by status. Default: all.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_list_labels ~36

List the account's labels, one name per line. Labels are created by passing them to taskhold_create or taskhold_begin.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_list_projects ~52

List projects with their open work, one line each. You rarely need this: every tool takes project as a name. Each line has the name, open counts (working, blocked, todo) and id.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_plan ~183

Add ordered steps (subtasks) to a task so the person sees a checklist; the progress bar fills as steps finish. taskhold_begin already does this for new work. For an existing task: taskhold_start it, then taskhold_plan. Steps don't nest. Returns the task's whole step list with ids. Fails on an unknown task_id, on a step (plan its parent) or past 200 steps per task. Planning a done task adds todo steps but leaves it done; taskhold_start it to reopen.

NameTypeReqDescription
replaceboolean–Replace steps that haven't started yet (done and in-progress steps stay). Default false: append.
stepsarrayyesSteps in order, e.g. ["Write the migration", "Update the API", "Add tests"]
task_idstringyesThe ID of the task to plan

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_progress ~214

Move the person's progress bar during a long step or a task without steps: percent, or current and total (e.g. 12 of 40 files), plus a short message about what's happening now. On a task with steps, the steps drive the bar: numbers you send for the task go to its running step. Call at milestones, every few minutes at most. Returns the task's progress bar and, on a task with steps, which step your numbers went to. Fails without percent, total or message, on an unknown task_id, or past the per-minute limit (the error says when to retry).

NameTypeReqDescription
currentinteger–Items done so far, with total
messagestring–What is happening now, e.g. "Running the test suite"
percentnumber–0-100
task_idstringyesThe ID of the task you are reporting on (a step, or a task without steps)
totalinteger–Total items

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_search ~135

Search tasks and steps by text in the title or description (case-insensitive, up to 100 tasks scanned). Returns matching lines grouped by status, with ids (a step names the task it belongs to), or a line saying nothing matched.

NameTypeReqDescription
projectstring–Project name, e.g. the repo folder ("api-server"). Matched case-insensitively (or a project id). An unknown name matches nothing.
project_idstring–Filter by project id (project, a name, is easier)
querystringyesSearch text
statusstring–Filter by status

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_set_priority ~61

Change a task's priority. Returns the task title and new priority; an unknown task_id fails with "Task not found".

NameTypeReqDescription
prioritystringyesNew priority
task_idstringyesThe ID of the task to reprioritize

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_start ~141

Mark a task or step in progress when you begin it. Starting a step also starts its task. For new work, taskhold_begin files, plans and starts in one call. Returns the id, status and the next step's id when it has steps. Safe to repeat; it also resumes a blocked or done task. An unknown task_id fails with "Task not found".

NameTypeReqDescription
agentstring–Who is working, shown to the person: "<client> in <repo folder>", e.g. "Claude Code in api-server". Outside a repo just "Claude Code".
task_idstringyesThe ID of the task to start

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_unblock ~80

Move a blocked task back to todo once the blocker is resolved (taskhold_start resumes it directly). Returns the task with status todo. A task that isn't blocked is left as it is and the reply says its status; an unknown task_id fails with "Task not found".

NameTypeReqDescription
task_idstringyesThe ID of the task to unblock

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_update ~171

Update a task's title, description, priority or project. Only fields you pass change; status goes through taskhold_start, taskhold_complete and taskhold_block. Returns the task as it is now. Fails on an unknown task_id, a project_id that doesn't exist (pass project by name instead) or an invalid project name.

NameTypeReqDescription
descriptionstring–New description
prioritystring–New priority
projectstring–Project name, e.g. the repo folder ("api-server"). Move it to this project (matched case-insensitively, created on first use).
project_id––Move to project by id (null to remove)
task_idstringyesThe ID of the task to update
titlestring–New title

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_update_project ~132

Change a project's name, description or color. Only fields you pass change. Returns the project as it is now. Fails on an unknown project (it is never created here), on a name another project already has, or with nothing to change.

NameTypeReqDescription
colorstring–New hex color, e.g. "#2f6fdb"
descriptionstring–New one-line description ("" clears it)
namestring–New name
projectstringyesThe project to change: its name (case-insensitive) or id, e.g. "api-server"

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

taskhold_updates ~282

What the person changed since you last looked: replies (notes), new tasks, priority changes, unblocks. Call when you resume, between steps, and after blocking (with wait, to hold until the reply lands). Pass the cursor from the previous call (or from taskhold_begin / taskhold_block) as since. Your own changes are hidden unless include_agent is true. Returns one line per change, oldest first (time, who, task, what changed, task id), then the cursor for next time; with nothing new it says so and still gives a cursor. An unknown project returns no changes; an unknown task_id fails with "Task not found".

NameTypeReqDescription
include_agentboolean–Also include changes made by agents, yours included (default: the person's changes only)
projectstring–Project name, e.g. the repo folder ("api-server"). Matched case-insensitively (or a project id). An unknown name matches nothing.
sinceinteger–Cursor from the previous call. Omit the first time (you get the latest 20).
task_idstring–Only changes to this task and its steps (e.g. the one you blocked)
waitinteger–Seconds to wait for a change when there is none yet (0-50). Use after taskhold_block.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Taskhold MCP server?

Taskhold is a hosted endpoint at https://taskhold.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · taskhold.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-taskhold-taskhold 'https://taskhold.com/api/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Taskhold MCP server?

Taskhold is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.taskhold/taskhold. Shared task list for Claude Code, Cursor and Codex: live progress per step, questions you answer. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://taskhold.com/api/mcp).

Is the Taskhold MCP server safe to use?

Taskhold scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Taskhold MCP server expose?

Taskhold exposes 22 tools: taskhold_begin, taskhold_list, taskhold_get, taskhold_get_current, taskhold_search, and 17 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 3,873 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Taskhold MCP server require authentication?

Yes. Taskhold asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.

Is the Taskhold MCP server still maintained?

Taskhold is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.