Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

SubmitMyStartup

REMOTE · SUBMITMYSTARTUP.COM

Find where to submit your startup. Searches a free list of directories with real submission results.

+2 this week 85 Trust /100

Last scanned (11 hours ago)

Scores higher than 91% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Marketing and SEO

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
  • The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
  • No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
  • HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
  • The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
  • DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability62
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1871 tokens (~374/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (40% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (13)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
  • 25 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
  • 24 Oct 26 +1
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://submitmystartup.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.submitmystartup.com CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 24 Sept 2026 23 Dec 2026 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 64eab21137f19739572540a6f6539e12db7
SANs: *.submitmystartup.com, submitmystartup.com
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of submitmystartup.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. DS published 19718 13 Verified
submitmystartup.com. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://submitmystartup.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://submitmystartup.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://submitmystartup.com/mcp
MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~1,519 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
fetch ~138

The full record of one place on the list, as readable text: cost and catch, what the free path needs and doesn't, the wait, review, backlink, which products, audiences, stages, and regions it takes, the list's notes, when it was last checked, the maintainer's own attempt, and where each fact came from. Takes an id from search or find_directories; a name or website also works. Returns id, title, text, url (the place's row on the website, for citing), and metadata.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesThe place's id from search, for example "indie-hackers".
NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyes–
metadataobject––
textstringyes–
titlestringyes–
urlstringyes–

No examples provided.

find_directories ~919

Shortlist places to submit or launch a startup (directories, launch sites, communities, editorial sites) that fit a founder's product and limits. Use it when someone asks where to list, launch, or promote their startup or product. Returns a ranked list: Free with no catch first, then free with a catch, then paid by lowest listed price, then cost not on record. Within each group: shortest wait, then fewest unknown facts, then name. Never ranked by my own traffic results. Each result gives the cost and catch (cost, free), what the free path needs (needs), the wait, why it fits (why), which facts the query needs that are not on record (unknown), the list's notes, when it was last checked, and rowUrl, the place's row on the website. Leave out any filter that doesn't matter. Use get_directory for every fact about one place, and list_filters for allowed values and example arguments.

NameTypeReqDescription
audiencestring–Who the product is for. b2c drops places that only take business-to-business products (G2 and similar).
budgetnumber–The most the founder will pay for one listing, in USD unless currency is set. 0 means free paths only (free, and free with a catch). Leave out for any cost.
can_add_badgeboolean–false if the founder can't put a badge or backlink on their site. Default true.
cannotarray–Other requirements the founder can't meet: account, engagement (upvote, comment on, or rate other products first), socialProfile, phone, captcha, ownDomain, invitation, revenueProof. badge and domain…
categoriesarray–Only these sections of the list: directories, specialist (only for some startups), reddit, paid, problems.
countrystring–Where the startup is based, as an ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code (AU, US, GB, IN); a country name such as Australia also works. Regional places limited to other countries drop out. Leave out for no region f…
currencystring–ISO 4217 currency of budget. Default USD. Prices in another currency count as unknown.
domain_ratingnumber–The product site's domain rating, for places that set a minimum.
early_stageboolean–true if the startup meets early-stage rules (for example under 5 years old, at most two institutional rounds).
formatsarray–Only these listing formats: directory, launch (a dated launch), profile, editorial (a pitch for coverage), community (a post), app-review, review-site, gallery, beta-testing.
has_domain_emailboolean–false if the founder has no email address on the product's own domain (only Gmail or similar). Default true.
include_problem_sitesboolean–true to include places reported broken, inactive, closed, or dead. Default false.
limitinteger–How many results to return, 1 to 50. Default 20.
marketsarray–Markets the founder wants to reach (ISO alpha-2 codes or country names), for regional sites that cover a market or language rather than requiring a headquarters there.
offsetinteger–Skip this many results, for paging. Default 0.
product_typesarray–What the product is, as tags (see list_filters), for example ["web-apps"] or ["saas", "developer-tools"]. Give only tags that are true of the product: a product without AI features leaves out ai-tool…
releasedboolean–true if the product is publicly released and usable, false if it is pre-release or in beta.
strictboolean–true to drop places where any fact the query needs isn't on record. Default false: they stay in, with the unknown facts listed.
subdivisionstring–ISO 3166-2 state or province, when a place is limited to one (US-WA). Implies the country.
within_daysinteger–The listing must go live within this many days on the free path. A place whose wait isn't on record counts as unknown.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_directory ~167

Every fact about one place on the list, for when a founder asks about a specific directory or launch site. Returns a short summary (cost and catch, what the free path needs, the wait, review, backlink, rowUrl), then the full record: the list's notes and Free? label, structured facts (cost, what it accepts, free-path requirements, wait, review, backlink), where each fact came from and when, the status of the maintainer's own attempt, and links. Look it up by id (from find_directories or search), name, or website URL.

NameTypeReqDescription
id_or_namestringyesThe place's id (for example "indie-hackers"), its name ("Indie Hackers"), or its website ("indiehackers.com").

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_filters ~56

The allowed values for find_directories: product types (and the types each implies), audiences, formats, sections of the list, requirements for cannot, the limited regions on record, price currencies, counts, and example arguments for common questions.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search ~239

Keyword search over the list of places to submit a startup. A place's exact name or website ("Indie Hackers", "indiehackers.com") puts it first. Asking for free ("free", "no cost", "$0") leaves out places that are paid only. Product words ("web app", "SaaS", "AI tool", "mobile app") keep only places that take that kind of product. Kind-of-place words ("launch site", "directory", "community") put places of that kind first. Other words match names, websites, regions, and the list's notes. For example "free launch sites for a web app", "AI tool directories", or "Australia". Returns up to 20 places, best match first, each with id, title, url (its row on submitmystartup.com, for citing), and a one-line summary. A query with no specific words returns the best free places. Use fetch with an id for the full record, and find_directories to shortlist by a founder's product and limits.

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyesWhat to look for, in a few words.
NameTypeReqDescription
resultsarrayyesBest match first.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the SubmitMyStartup MCP server?

SubmitMyStartup is a hosted endpoint at https://submitmystartup.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · submitmystartup.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-submitmystartup-mcp 'https://submitmystartup.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the SubmitMyStartup MCP server?

SubmitMyStartup is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.submitmystartup/mcp. Find where to submit your startup. Searches a free list of directories with real submission results. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://submitmystartup.com/mcp).

Is the SubmitMyStartup MCP server safe to use?

SubmitMyStartup scores 85 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the SubmitMyStartup MCP server expose?

SubmitMyStartup exposes 5 tools: find_directories, get_directory, list_filters, search, fetch. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,519 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the SubmitMyStartup MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to SubmitMyStartup without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the SubmitMyStartup MCP server still maintained?

SubmitMyStartup is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the SubmitMyStartup MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on SubmitMyStartup, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.