Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

stierproducts tier lists

REMOTE · MCP.STIERPRODUCTS.COM · SCANNED SEP 22

S-to-F tier lists for 208 product categories. Every placement cited, with barcodes.

0 this week 83 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability75
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 795 tokens (~132/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage95
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 82% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Install

How do I install the stierproducts tier lists MCP server?

stierproducts tier lists is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.stierproducts.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.stierproducts.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-stierproducts-tier-lists 'https://mcp.stierproducts.com/mcp'
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-stierproducts-tier-lists": {
      "url": "https://mcp.stierproducts.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "com-stierproducts-tier-lists": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.stierproducts.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.com-stierproducts-tier-lists]
url = "https://mcp.stierproducts.com/mcp"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "com-stierproducts-tier-lists": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://mcp.stierproducts.com/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add com-stierproducts-tier-lists --url 'https://mcp.stierproducts.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  com-stierproducts-tier-lists:
    url: "https://mcp.stierproducts.com/mcp"
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "com-stierproducts-tier-lists": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://mcp.stierproducts.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add com-stierproducts-tier-lists -t streamable-http -u 'https://mcp.stierproducts.com/mcp'
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-stierproducts-tier-lists": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.stierproducts.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 15 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 14 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 10 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 8 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 6 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 22 Sept 2026 · Probed https://mcp.stierproducts.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=stierproducts.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 21 Aug 2026 19 Nov 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 15a67e40528814670eae4d8f92e921cf
SANs: stierproducts.com, *.stierproducts.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.stierproducts.com. Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
stierproducts.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.stierproducts.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.stierproducts.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://mcp.stierproducts.com/mcp
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~584 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
compare_products ~62

Compare two to five products side by side. They must share a category: LP is points on one category ladder and comparing across boards is meaningless, so a mixed request is refused rather than answered misleadingly.

NameTypeReqDescription
slugsarrayyesProduct slugs to compare.
NameTypeReqDescription
attributionstringyes
categoryobjectyes
licenseobjectyes
monetizationobjectyes
notestringyes
productsarrayyes
source_urlstringyes

No examples provided.

get_product ~179

Everything held on one product: its placement, verdict, pros and cons, GTIN barcodes, the announcement date where the maker published one, and a breakdown of how the cited sources read (how many were glowing, positive, neutral or negative, and whether they were outlets, named authors, video channels or forum owners). Then every citation in full, with a verbatim quote, who said it, and whether the link was fetched and confirmed. Use this when a claim needs backing up.

NameTypeReqDescription
citation_limitintegerHow many citations to return, most notable first. The sentiment and speaker breakdowns always count every source regardless of this.
citation_offsetintegerSkip this many citations. Use it to page through the rest.
slugstringyesProduct slug, e.g. "bambu-lab-x2d".
NameTypeReqDescription
attributionstringyes
categoryobjectyes
citationsarrayyes
citations_confirmed_liveintegeryes
citations_offsetintegeryes
citations_remainingintegeryes
citations_shownintegeryes
citations_totalintegeryes
licenseobjectyes
monetizationobjectyes
productobjectyes
sentimentobject
source_urlstringyes
speaker_mixobject

No examples provided.

get_tier_list ~119

The full S-to-F tier list for one category: every ranked product with its tier, rank, LP, verdict, pros, cons, citation counts, GTIN barcodes and, where the maker published one, the announcement date. This is the primary tool and one call answers a "what is the best X" question completely. Call get_product for the quotes behind a placement.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystringyesCategory slug, e.g. "3d-printers".
tierstringOptional. Return only this tier.
NameTypeReqDescription
attributionstringyes
categoryobjectyes
licenseobjectyes
methodstringyes
monetizationobjectyes
productsarrayyes
products_rankedintegeryes
source_urlstringyes
summarystringyes
tier_meaningsobjectyes

No examples provided.

list_categories ~73

List the product categories that have a published tier list, newest research first. Call this first when you do not already know the exact category slug: slugs cannot be guessed reliably and every other tool takes one.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger
querystringOptional filter matched against the category name and description.
NameTypeReqDescription
attributionstringyes
categoriesarrayyes
countintegeryes
licenseobjectyes
monetizationobjectyes
source_urlstringyes

No examples provided.

search_products ~72

Find ranked products by name or brand across every board. Returns the slug, category and tier for each match, which is what get_product and get_tier_list need next.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger
querystringyesProduct or brand name, e.g. "Bambu Lab X2D".
NameTypeReqDescription
attributionstringyes
licenseobjectyes
matchesintegeryes
monetizationobjectyes
productsarrayyes
querystringyes
source_urlstringyes

No examples provided.

what_to_avoid ~79

The products the research placed in the bottom tiers, and the ones it deliberately entered as traps buyers cross-shop but should not buy. Use it to answer "what should I not buy" and to check whether a product a user is considering was flagged.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystringyesCategory slug, e.g. "3d-printers".
NameTypeReqDescription
attributionstringyes
bottom_tier_countintegeryes
categoryobjectyes
flagged_countintegeryes
licenseobjectyes
monetizationobjectyes
productsarrayyes
source_urlstringyes

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the stierproducts tier lists MCP server?

stierproducts tier lists is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.stierproducts/tier-lists. S-to-F tier lists for 208 product categories. Every placement cited, with barcodes. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.stierproducts.com/mcp).

Is the stierproducts tier lists MCP server safe to use?

stierproducts tier lists scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the stierproducts tier lists MCP server expose?

stierproducts tier lists exposes 6 tools: list_categories, search_products, get_tier_list, get_product, compare_products, what_to_avoid. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 584 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the stierproducts tier lists MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to stierproducts tier lists without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the stierproducts tier lists MCP server still maintained?

stierproducts tier lists is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.