Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Stellarhound — stargazing forecasts, dark-sky sites & aurora

REMOTE · STELLARHOUND.COM

Live stargazing forecasts: per-night sky scores, dark-sky sites, aurora & light pollution anywhere.

Available components

0 this week 81 Trust /100

Last scanned (21 hours ago)

Scores higher than 86% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 24 Oct 2026.

Category Maps and Location

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability67
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1295 tokens (~259/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage67
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 18 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 26 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 20 Aug 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 19 Aug 26 0

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 24 Oct 2026 · Probed https://stellarhound.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=stellarhound.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 12 Sept 2026 11 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 8de748f834d16977136624f6c1087102
SANs: stellarhound.com, *.stellarhound.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of stellarhound.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
stellarhound.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://stellarhound.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://stellarhound.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 302 https://stellarhound.com/mcp
MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~1,012 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
find_dark_sky_sites ~236

Recommend dark-sky sites near a location, ranked by whether the drive is worth it. Use for "where should I drive to stargaze near X". Sites are grouped by drivability (how far), then ranked by a drive-worth score combining the best weather window over the next 7 nights, how much darker the site is than the user's location, and drive time. Drive times are approximate (straight-line x 1.3), not routed. Args: lat: Latitude in decimal degrees (-90..90). lon: Longitude in decimal degrees (-180..180). limit: Max sites to return, 1-12 (default 5). Returns {ranking (methodology note), tiers:[{tier, label, hint, sites:[...]}], nearest_km, uncertainty_note, attribution} — sites grouped into drivability tiers. Include the methodology note when presenting — it explains the ordering honestly.

NameTypeReqDescription
latnumberyes–
limitinteger––
lonnumberyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_aurora_forecast ~164

Get the aurora (northern/southern lights) outlook for a location. Use for "any chance of aurora tonight near X". Combines the Kp-index forecast with the location's geomagnetic latitude to say whether aurora could be visible there, and when. Args: lat: Latitude in decimal degrees (-90..90). lon: Longitude in decimal degrees (-180..180). Returns {kp_forecast:[{time, kp, flag: observed|estimated|predicted}, ...], visibility assessment fields, attribution}. Kp entries are flagged by how firm they are — keep those labels when presenting.

NameTypeReqDescription
latnumberyes–
lonnumberyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_light_pollution ~192

Estimate light pollution at any point: approximate Bortle class and what's visible there. Use for "how dark is the sky at X" / "can I see the Milky Way from X". Returns the zenith-brightness-derived estimate (mpsas, approximate Bortle class) and a plain-language ceiling: what the Milky Way, naked-eye and telescope views are like under that sky. This is a satellite-data estimate, not a field measurement — say so. Args: lat: Latitude in decimal degrees (-90..90). lon: Longitude in decimal degrees (-180..180). Returns {light_pollution:{bortle_approx, mpsas, ceiling:{label, milky_way, naked_eye, telescope}, note}, attribution}.

NameTypeReqDescription
latnumberyes–
lonnumberyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_stargazing_conditions ~267

Score the next nights for stargazing at a location (0-100 per night). Use for "when should I stargaze this week near X", "is Saturday any good for the Milky Way", trip planning. Each night combines the three-layer cloud-cover forecast, moon illumination and up-fraction, and the astronomical-darkness window; `best_window` names the best upcoming night. Also returns the location's light-pollution estimate (approximate Bortle class + what's visible at that darkness). Args: lat: Latitude in decimal degrees (-90..90). You know city coordinates — pass them. lon: Longitude in decimal degrees (-180..180). nights: How many nights ahead to score, 1-16 (default 7; forecasts beyond ~7 nights are increasingly uncertain). Returns {timezone, light_pollution, nights:[{date, darkness, moon, cloud, score:{value, band, summary}}], best_window, uncertainty_note, attribution}. Present scores/verdicts verbatim; skies beyond ~7 days are provisional.

NameTypeReqDescription
latnumberyes–
lonnumberyes–
nightsinteger––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_tonight_agenda ~153

Get tonight's stargazing plan for a location: score, darkness window, and what to observe. Use when the user asks "what can I see tonight" / "is tonight worth going out". Returns tonight's sky score and darkness window plus a ranked agenda of observing targets appropriate for the location's sky darkness. Args: lat: Latitude in decimal degrees (-90..90). lon: Longitude in decimal degrees (-180..180). Returns {timezone, light_pollution, tonight:{date, darkness, weather,...}, targets/agenda entries, attribution}. Report as returned.

NameTypeReqDescription
latnumberyes–
lonnumberyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Stellarhound — stargazing forecasts, dark-sky sites & aurora MCP server?

Stellarhound — stargazing forecasts, dark-sky sites & aurora is a hosted endpoint at https://stellarhound.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · stellarhound.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-stellarhound-stellarhound-mcp 'https://stellarhound.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Stellarhound — stargazing forecasts, dark-sky sites & aurora MCP server?

Stellarhound — stargazing forecasts, dark-sky sites & aurora is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.stellarhound/stellarhound-mcp. Live stargazing forecasts: per-night sky scores, dark-sky sites, aurora & light pollution anywhere. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://stellarhound.com/mcp).

Is the Stellarhound — stargazing forecasts, dark-sky sites & aurora MCP server safe to use?

Stellarhound — stargazing forecasts, dark-sky sites & aurora scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Stellarhound — stargazing forecasts, dark-sky sites & aurora MCP server expose?

Stellarhound — stargazing forecasts, dark-sky sites & aurora exposes 5 tools: get_stargazing_conditions, get_tonight_agenda, find_dark_sky_sites, get_aurora_forecast, get_light_pollution. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,012 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Stellarhound — stargazing forecasts, dark-sky sites & aurora MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Stellarhound — stargazing forecasts, dark-sky sites & aurora without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Stellarhound — stargazing forecasts, dark-sky sites & aurora MCP server still maintained?

Stellarhound — stargazing forecasts, dark-sky sites & aurora is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.