SSANVPS - VPS & domain price comparison
REMOTE · SSANVPS.COM
Cheapest and best-value VPS plans by spec, plus domain prices, read daily from official pricing.
Available components
Last scanned (39 minutes ago)
Scores higher than 84% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Cloud Infrastructure
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability72
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 789 tokens (~131/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management70
- Stability observed for 21 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage97
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 90% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Schema quality: 147 → 131 ▲ functional
- New tool “calculate_domain_tco” functional
- New tool “get_best_deals” functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://ssanvps.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=ssanvps.com | CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 7 Oct 2026 | 5 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 588a70f3a8dc9dabe318fa70fc00ed379db |
| SANs: ssanvps.com, www.ssanvps.com | ||||||
| CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of ssanvps.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| ssanvps.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://ssanvps.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://ssanvps.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://ssanvps.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
calculate_domain_tco Calculate domain TCO comparison ~113
Calculate and rank 1-5 year Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) across all registrars for a domain TLD (.com, .net, .org, .io, .ai, etc.), including renewal price hikes and WHOIS privacy fees, showing potential savings.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| tld | string | yes | Domain extension without dot (e.g. com, org, net, io, ai, kr) |
| years | integer | – | Registration duration in years (1 to 5, default 3) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
compare_providers Compare VPS providers ~72
Compare 2-6 VPS providers: number of plans, cheapest plan, best-value plan and Seoul region availability for each. Optionally only plans meeting minimum specs.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| min_ram_gb | number | – | – |
| min_vcpu | number | – | – |
| providers | array | yes | Provider ids or names |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
domain_prices Compare domain prices ~109
Compare domain registrars for one extension by total cost over 1-5 years (first-year registration + renewals + WHOIS privacy) in pre-tax USD. This does not check whether a name is available.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | Number of registrars (default 10) |
| tld | string | yes | Extension without the dot: com, net, org, io, ai, kr, co.kr |
| years | integer | – | Total cost period in years (default 5) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find_vps Find VPS plans ~204
Find no-commitment monthly VPS plans that meet minimum specs, sorted by value index (default) or by price. Returns the best matching plan per provider unless one_per_provider is false.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | Number of results (default 10) |
| max_usd_monthly | number | – | Maximum pre-tax monthly price in USD |
| min_disk_gb | number | – | Minimum storage in GB |
| min_ram_gb | number | – | Minimum RAM in GB |
| min_vcpu | number | – | Minimum vCPU count |
| one_per_provider | boolean | – | Only the best plan per provider (default true) |
| provider_country | string | – | Two-letter country code of the provider company, e.g. US, DE, KR, JP |
| seoul_region | boolean | – | Only providers with a Seoul (South Korea) region |
| sort | string | – | value = best value index first (default), price = cheapest first |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_best_deals Get best VPS deals and highlights ~66
Get today's top VPS highlights: top best-value plans, top cheapest plans, and top Seoul-region plans. Fast zero-argument overview.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Category filter (default "all") |
| limit | integer | – | Number of results per category (default 5) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_provider Get a VPS provider ~64
All no-commitment plans of one VPS provider with specs, prices, value index and overall rank. Accepts a provider id (e.g. "vultr") or name (e.g. "DigitalOcean").
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| provider | string | yes | Provider id or name |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the SSANVPS - VPS & domain price comparison MCP server?
SSANVPS - VPS & domain price comparison is a hosted endpoint at https://ssanvps.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · ssanvps.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-ssanvps-vps-prices 'https://ssanvps.com/mcp'
What is the SSANVPS - VPS & domain price comparison MCP server?
SSANVPS - VPS & domain price comparison is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.ssanvps/vps-prices. Cheapest and best-value VPS plans by spec, plus domain prices, read daily from official pricing. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://ssanvps.com/mcp).
Is the SSANVPS - VPS & domain price comparison MCP server safe to use?
SSANVPS - VPS & domain price comparison scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the SSANVPS - VPS & domain price comparison MCP server expose?
SSANVPS - VPS & domain price comparison exposes 6 tools: get_best_deals, find_vps, get_provider, compare_providers, domain_prices, calculate_domain_tco. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 628 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the SSANVPS - VPS & domain price comparison MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to SSANVPS - VPS & domain price comparison without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the SSANVPS - VPS & domain price comparison MCP server still maintained?
SSANVPS - VPS & domain price comparison is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.