Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Shoptegrity

REMOTE · MCP.SHOPTEG.COM

See who gets your money, catch fake holiday discounts, and find independent and local sellers.

Available components

+3 this week 77 Trust /100

Last scanned (16 hours ago)

Scores higher than 69% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category E-commerce

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
  • The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
  • No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
  • HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
  • HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability80
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1568 tokens (~112/item across 14 items; 14 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management53
  • Stability observed for 16 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 14 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 15 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (13)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1
    • Tool “check_seller” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “find_alternatives” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “find_local_businesses” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “get_retailer_swaps” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “lookup_brand” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “lookup_brand_integrity” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “rate_major_retailers” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “search_top_brands” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
    • Server version: 0.6.0 → 0.7.0 functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.shopteg.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=shopteg.com CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 9 Oct 2026 7 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6ebd65e4017f8c5a18848b11f2c517561c7
SANs: *.shopteg.com, shopteg.com
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.shopteg.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. DS published 19718 13 Verified
shopteg.com. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
x-content-type-options nosniff

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.shopteg.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.shopteg.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://mcp.shopteg.com/mcp
MCP tools · 14 exposed · ~1,388 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
browse_alternatives ~117

Alternatives to mainstream shopping that have a cited basis: employee-owned, cooperative, credit union, B Corp or family-owned sellers. structure filters by kind (for example 'employee-owned', 'cooperative', 'credit union', 'b corp'); query filters by words in the name or the category it substitutes for (for example 'grocery' or 'hardware'). Each result carries the source that backs it. Not ranked by commission.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
query–––
structure–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

check_cart ~90

Check a shopping or gift list: for each item, which scored company it belongs to (if any), the cited facts Shoptegrity holds (parent, filings, shareholder payouts) and what is withheld. Items can be products, brands or stores, such as 'AirPods', 'Tide pods' or 'Walmart'. Up to 50 items.

NameTypeReqDescription
itemsarrayyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

check_deal ~80

Judge a sale price against Shoptegrity's recorded daily price history for a Shopify catalog product. Flags 'raised_then_lowered' when a price was pushed up before a sale. Works for Black Friday and Cyber Monday deals. product_id comes from responsible_alternatives.

NameTypeReqDescription
current_price–––
product_idstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

check_seller ~64

Shoptegrity's cited ownership signals for a seller or brand name, or a plain statement that it has none (not a negative finding). Same data as lookup_brand, phrased for a seller you are about to buy from.

NameTypeReqDescription
namestringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

find_alternatives ~79

List alternatives for one brand that a Shoptegrity editor approved and that have a cited basis. Returns an empty list, with a note, when none are approved yet; browse_alternatives lists cited employee-owned, cooperative and independent options by category instead. Alternatives are not ranked by commission.

NameTypeReqDescription
brand_namestringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

find_local_businesses ~165

Local businesses near a US ZIP code or a town and state, such as '55401' or 'Duluth, MN': Shoptegrity's directory (co-ops, markets, credit unions; pilot areas) plus independent shops anywhere in the US (books, gifts, toys, food, markets, grocery, hardware, clothing, secondhand, outdoors, home, music), for Small Business Saturday or any local shopping. category narrows either list; radius_km is 0.1 to 500 (default 25; shops are searched within 15). Chains and franchises are left out. Not ranked by commission.

NameTypeReqDescription
category–––
locationstringyes–
radius_kmnumber––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

get_retailer_swaps ~70

One major retailer's cited financial figures and any editor-approved swap. Takes a retailer name such as Walmart or The Home Depot. The swap fields are null until a swap has been approved and cited; the error lists the retailers available.

NameTypeReqDescription
retailer_namestringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

holiday_shopping_guide ~138

A plan for shopping with integrity on Black Friday, Small Business Saturday, Cyber Monday, Giving Tuesday or for holiday gifts: the date, days left, and which Shoptegrity tools to use at each step. occasion is black_friday, small_business_saturday, cyber_monday, giving_tuesday, christmas, or 'next' for the next one coming up. today is an ISO date and defaults to the server's date. For Black Friday, Cyber Monday and holiday gifts it also returns links to large retailers' own weekly-ad and deals pages.

NameTypeReqDescription
occasionstring––
today–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

lookup_brand ~100

Look up one brand, store or company by name: its cited parent company, ownership type, source links and, for scored brands, a Shoptegrity composite score (an opinion). Use it for a single known name. Fields without a cited source come back null and are listed as withheld. A name Shoptegrity does not have returns an error that is not a negative finding about the company.

NameTypeReqDescription
namestringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

lookup_brand_integrity ~78

In-depth cited metrics for one brand: the split of revenue among workers, executives and shareholders, labor records, and waste, plus SEC filing figures where they exist. Every field without a cited source is null and listed under withheld_claims. Grades and ratings are Shoptegrity opinions.

NameTypeReqDescription
brand_namestringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

rate_major_retailers ~88

Scorecards for the major retailers Shoptegrity covers (Walmart, Target, Costco, Amazon, Kroger, Dollar General, The Home Depot, WinCo Foods, Ace Hardware): parent company, revenue, net income and shareholder payouts from SEC filings, and ratings or swaps only where an editor approved them. Takes no arguments. Missing values are null (withheld).

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

responsible_alternatives ~73

Search independent sellers for a product or gift idea, with today's price, a check against recorded price history, and any Shoptegrity standing, for gift ideas and holiday shopping. max_price is in USD.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
max_price–––
productstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

search_top_brands ~97

Search the scored-brand table by name, category and minimum grade, and return a short summary per brand (parent company, shareholder payout, grade and ratings where published). Use it to browse; use lookup_brand for one known name. An empty result means no match, not a negative finding.

NameTypeReqDescription
category–––
limitinteger––
min_grade–––
querystring––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

verified_deals ~149

Products from independent Shopify sellers whose price Shoptegrity recorded dropping below its usual level. Shows real drops rather than headline discounts, for Black Friday and Cyber Monday. A drop counts only with at least 7 earlier days of recorded prices; prices raised before a sale never qualify. min_percent_off is 1-90. query filters by words in the title or seller. max_per_seller (default 3) keeps one seller's sale from filling the list. Largest drop first, never ordered by commission.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
max_per_sellerinteger––
min_percent_offnumber––
query–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Shoptegrity MCP server?

Shoptegrity is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.shopteg.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.shopteg.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-shopteg-shoptegrity 'https://mcp.shopteg.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Shoptegrity MCP server?

Shoptegrity is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.shopteg/shoptegrity. See who gets your money, catch fake holiday discounts, and find independent and local sellers. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.shopteg.com/mcp).

Is the Shoptegrity MCP server safe to use?

Shoptegrity scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Shoptegrity MCP server expose?

Shoptegrity exposes 14 tools: lookup_brand, find_alternatives, browse_alternatives, find_local_businesses, search_top_brands, and 9 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,388 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Shoptegrity MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Shoptegrity without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Shoptegrity MCP server still maintained?

Shoptegrity is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Shoptegrity MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Shoptegrity, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.