Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

GEO SEO Records

REMOTE · API.SEORECORDS.COM

Gets a website ready for AI assistants: robots.txt fixed, llms.txt drafted, citable gaps listed.

72 Trust /100

Last scanned (9 hours ago)

Scores higher than 63% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 17 Oct 2026.

Category Marketing and SEO

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability67
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 643 tokens (~160/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management3
  • Stability observed for 1 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 17 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 16 Oct 26 72

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 17 Oct 2026 · Probed https://api.seorecords.com/mcp/geo

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=api.seorecords.com CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 30 Aug 2026 28 Nov 2026 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 505fdadb252803eb41f2d02891fb7cc8f30
SANs: api.seorecords.com
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of api.seorecords.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
seorecords.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://api.seorecords.com/mcp/geo Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://api.seorecords.com/mcp/geo HTTPS enforced 308 https://api.seorecords.com/mcp/geo
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~519 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_ai_readiness ~143

Runs the GEO SEO Records engine on a public page and returns the gaps, weighted blocking / important / to decide, across six parts: the door (robots.txt rules for the robots that read for a person), the map (llms.txt present and verifiable), the answer (does the page answer under its title, declared questions), the citable (figures with a source or a date), the publisher identity, and the structure (blocks that stay true when quoted alone). Free. Docs: https://seorecords.com/assistants

NameTypeReqDescription
urlstringyesThe page address, e.g. example.com or https://example.com/page

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

draft_llms_txt ~117

Builds an llms.txt for a website from facts read on it — the site name and description from its home page, then pages from its sitemap with their titles and meta descriptions, grouped by section — and reviews the existing llms.txt if there is one (declared name, links, claims no machine can verify). The draft is ready to edit and publish at /llms.txt. Docs: https://seorecords.com/assistants

NameTypeReqDescription
urlstringyesThe website address, e.g. example.com

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_geo_offer ~105

Returns the GEO SEO Records module (WordPress, PrestaShop, network edge; from €490 for a year): what it applies (door, map, answer, publisher) and what it measures (assistant reads certified by IP range, demand read in the log, paying pages joined to revenue), with prices and secure Stripe payment links. Docs: https://seorecords.com/assistants

NameTypeReqDescription
languagestring–Language of the product page (default en)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

open_robots_txt_to_ai ~154

Reads the site's robots.txt and tells, robot by robot (GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, Claude-User, Claude-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, Perplexity-User, DuckAssistBot, Meta, Common Crawl, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended), whether it may read the site, separating robots that read for a person (live) from robots that harvest for training. Returns the corrected robots.txt that lets the live readers in while keeping the site's existing rules, ready to paste. Docs: https://seorecords.com/assistants

NameTypeReqDescription
urlstringyesThe website address, e.g. example.com

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the GEO SEO Records MCP server?

GEO SEO Records is a hosted endpoint at https://api.seorecords.com/mcp/geo, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · api.seorecords.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-seorecords-geo-seo-records 'https://api.seorecords.com/mcp/geo'
Common questions

What is the GEO SEO Records MCP server?

GEO SEO Records is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.seorecords/geo-seo-records. Gets a website ready for AI assistants: robots.txt fixed, llms.txt drafted, citable gaps listed. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.seorecords.com/mcp/geo).

Is the GEO SEO Records MCP server safe to use?

GEO SEO Records scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the GEO SEO Records MCP server expose?

GEO SEO Records exposes 4 tools: check_ai_readiness, open_robots_txt_to_ai, draft_llms_txt, get_geo_offer. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 519 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the GEO SEO Records MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to GEO SEO Records without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the GEO SEO Records MCP server still maintained?

GEO SEO Records is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 17 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.