Roofer Registry
REMOTE · ROOFERREGISTRY.COM
State-licensed roofing contractors with regulator discipline records and provenance.
Available components
Last scanned (11 hours ago)
Scores higher than 45% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category CRM and Sales
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 9 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability40
- 0% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Fail
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1266 tokens (~126/item across 10 items; 9 tools + 1 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management47
- Stability observed for 14 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage82
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 45% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety75
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "request_contact" implies "send" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
- An AI judge read all 10 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Checks we ran (12)
- TLS certificate
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Checks we could not complete (1)
These are gaps on our side, not findings about this hosted endpoint. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.
- Authorization in Endpoint SecurityAuthorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 9 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe.
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
- Tool “check_license” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 31 Oct 26 +1
- Tool “check_license” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 23 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 22 Oct 26 57
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://rooferregistry.com/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=rooferregistry.com | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 21 Sept 2026 | 20 Dec 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 693ed70858ed0e4b127efcc9b172c862c63 |
| SANs: rooferregistry.com | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of rooferregistry.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | DS published | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| rooferregistry.com. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://rooferregistry.com/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://rooferregistry.com/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://rooferregistry.com/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
changes_since ~118
License changes (new, lapsed, status change) since a given date, optionally filtered by state and change type. Changes are tracked starting from the first roster refresh after deploy — no backfill is available. Use when monitoring for new licenses, lapses, or status changes.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cursor | string | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| since | string | yes | ISO date, max 90 days back, e.g. 2026-09-01 |
| state | string | – | – |
| type | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_license ~201
Look up one roofing contractor license or registration by state and number. Returns status as published by the state regulator, a machine-readable verdict, licensee name, city, expiration, and provenance (regulator source URL + fetch date). Verdicts: licensed-active | licensed-not-active (trade license states like FL), registered-active | registered-not-active (registration states like NJ/PA — business registration, not a trade license), not-in-roster, not-found. The verdict is derived from the regulator-published status, not a recommendation. Use this when a user asks "is this roofing contractor licensed" or has a license number from a truck, yard sign, ad, or contract.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| license_number | string | yes | License number as printed, e.g. CCC1325838 or CGC061405; hyphens/spaces are ignored |
| state | string | yes | Two-letter state code or state name, e.g. FL, tx, Florida |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
compare_rules ~115
Compare a specific rule field across 2–10 states. Only states with verified: true carry a rule. Treat null as "not verified", not "no rule". Input formats: states as two-letter codes (FL, GA, TX); field is one of licensing, licenseTypes, deductibleWaiver, depositRule, permit, insurance, unlicensedPenalty, rightToCancel, aob.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| field | string | yes | – |
| states | array | yes | Two-letter state codes, e.g. ["FL", "GA"] |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
enforcement_actions ~153
Board discipline and unlicensed-activity citations for a state, license number, name, or county. Merges licensed-activity discipline rows and unlicensed-activity citations, newest first. Republished as filed; a citation is an allegation the board acted on, a Final Order is the board's decision.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| all_trades | boolean | – | – |
| county | string | – | e.g. Miami-Dade |
| license_number | string | – | e.g. CCC1325838 |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| name | string | – | Respondent or DBA name fragment |
| since | string | – | ISO date, e.g. 2025-01-01 |
| state | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
request_contact ~222
Send a contact request to ONE specific licensee the user has chosen, by license number. This creates the same consent-recorded request a person submits on the profile page; it is not lead routing and we never pick the licensee for the user. Only call after the user has seen the record and explicitly chosen this licensee. Required consent text must be shown to the user verbatim before calling.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| consent_confirmed | boolean | yes | User saw the consent text and agreed |
| string | yes | – | |
| first_name | string | yes | – |
| insurance_job | string | yes | is this an insurance claim: yes, no, not-sure |
| license_number | string | yes | – |
| phone | string | yes | – |
| project_type | string | yes | project type: replacement, repair-leak, storm, inspection, gutters, new-construction, commercial |
| state | string | yes | – |
| timeline | string | yes | when needed: emergency, within-month, 1-3-months, just-quotes |
| zip | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_licensees ~92
Search roofing contractors by name, firm, or partial license number, optionally within a state and city. Returns up to 50 regulator-sourced records with a true total count. Use this when the user has a name but no license number.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | string | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | Name, firm, or license fragment |
| state | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
state_rules ~106
Return what Roofer Registry has verified about a state's rules for roofing contractors: licensing, licenseTypes, deductibleWaiver, depositRule, permit, insurance, unlicensedPenalty, rightToCancel, aob — each { value, quote, citation, url } or null. Plus regulator, lookup URL, active-licensee count. If the state is not yet verified, the response says so — do not state a rule for that state from this source.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| state | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
unlicensed_activity ~161
List people and companies the state board cited for unlicensed contracting, filtered by county and/or name. Use when the user has a name or company from a truck or flyer but no license number, or asks who was caught working unlicensed after a storm. Republished as filed; a citation is not a judgment. Defaults to roofing-typed citations; set all_trades=true for all construction trades.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| all_trades | boolean | – | false (default) = roofing-typed citations only; true = all trades |
| county | string | – | e.g. Lee, Miami-Dade, Dade — normalized automatically |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| name | string | – | Respondent or DBA name fragment |
| state | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
verify_live ~94
Fetch the current license status directly from the state regulator (FL only) and compare it with our roster copy. Uses a 24-hour cache; the second call within 24h returns cached: true. Other states return { supported: false, lookupUrl }. Hard cap: 100 live fetches per UTC day.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| license_number | string | yes | e.g. CCC1325838 |
| state | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Roofer Registry MCP server?
Roofer Registry is a hosted endpoint at https://rooferregistry.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · rooferregistry.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-rooferregistry-roofer-registry 'https://rooferregistry.com/api/mcp'
What is the Roofer Registry MCP server?
Roofer Registry is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.rooferregistry/roofer-registry. State-licensed roofing contractors with regulator discipline records and provenance. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://rooferregistry.com/api/mcp).
Is the Roofer Registry MCP server safe to use?
Roofer Registry scores 64 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Roofer Registry MCP server expose?
Roofer Registry exposes 9 tools: check_license, search_licensees, state_rules, unlicensed_activity, enforcement_actions, and 4 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,262 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Roofer Registry MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Roofer Registry without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Roofer Registry MCP server still maintained?
Roofer Registry is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Roofer Registry MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 12 checks on Roofer Registry, covering TLS certificate, HTTPS, HSTS header, DNSSEC and 8 more. One item could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Roofer Registry: Authorization. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.