ReceptionistPrices.com pricing
REMOTE · WWW.RECEPTIONISTPRICES.COM
Dated AI and virtual receptionist prices, billing terms, integrations and hire-vs-AI costs.
Available components
Last scanned (9 minutes ago)
Scores higher than 57% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category CRM and Sales
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability43
- 0% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Fail
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 812 tokens (~116/item across 7 items; 6 tools + 1 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management27
- Stability observed for 8 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage97
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 91% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
- Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 28 Oct 26 68
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.receptionistprices.com/mcp/
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=www.receptionistprices.com | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 27 Oct 2026 | 25 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 6599203d1dd1c1c283d81ab83a0867b2245 |
| SANs: www.receptionistprices.com | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of www.receptionistprices.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| receptionistprices.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.receptionistprices.com/mcp/ | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.receptionistprices.com/mcp/ | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://www.receptionistprices.com/mcp/ |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
category_range Price range and median for AI or virtual receptionists ~101
The range and median monthly cost of AI receptionists or live virtual receptionists at a call volume (3-minute calls), the all-in rate per minute and the range of entry plans. Source: ReceptionistPrices.com, prices checked October 26, 2026, https://www.receptionistprices.com/ai-receptionist-cost/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| calls | integer | – | Calls a month |
| type | string | yes | ai, or virtual (live people) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
compare_at_volume Compare receptionists at a call volume ~139
Monthly cost of every AI or virtual receptionist at a call volume and call length, lowest first, from each vendor's cheapest published plan plus overage. Quote-only vendors are listed separately. Defaults: AI receptionists, 3-minute calls. Source: ReceptionistPrices.com, prices checked October 26, 2026, https://www.receptionistprices.com/ai-receptionist-cost/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| calls | integer | yes | Calls a month (13 calls a day, the small-business average in Google CallJoy's testing, is 390) |
| minutes_per_call | number | – | Average minutes per call |
| type | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_vendor_pricing A receptionist vendor's prices, terms and integrations ~138
One vendor's published plans, overage, cost at 3, 5 and 13 three-minute calls a day, billing terms (rounding, time billed beyond the call, spam, setup fee, contract, trial) and which business tools it writes to, each with the URL and the date it was read. Accepts an id or a name, e.g. "Ruby", "Smith.ai", "Rosie", "RingCentral". Source: ReceptionistPrices.com, prices checked October 26, 2026, https://www.receptionistprices.com/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| vendor | string | yes | Vendor id or name |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
hire_vs_ai What hiring a receptionist costs, against AI and virtual receptionists ~186
Monthly cost of an in-house receptionist from BLS data (OEWS median wage for SOC 43-4171, national or by state; ECEC employer benefits other than paid leave, which is already paid inside 2,080 paid hours; NCS paid leave days; JOLTS quits times a published replacement-cost share), for one full-time hire or for full cover of N hours a week, next to the cheapest AI and virtual receptionist at the same call volume. Source: ReceptionistPrices.com, prices checked October 26, 2026, https://www.receptionistprices.com/hire-vs-ai/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| calls | integer | – | Calls a month |
| hours_per_week | integer | – | Hours a week the phone must be covered; omit for one full-time hire |
| state | string | – | Two-letter state code, e.g. TX |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
integrations Which receptionists write to a business tool ~131
For Clio, MyCase, Lawmatics, HubSpot, GoHighLevel, Google Calendar, Calendly, Jobber, ServiceTitan, Housecall Pro or Towbook: which AI and virtual receptionists document a built-in integration, which connect through Zapier, and the page that shows it. "Not documented" means neither the vendor's pages nor the tool's directory show it; it is not a guess. Source: ReceptionistPrices.com, prices checked October 26, 2026, https://www.receptionistprices.com/integrations/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| tool | string | yes | The business tool |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_vendors List the AI and virtual receptionists in the price index ~112
Every AI receptionist, virtual receptionist and build-your-own voice AI platform ReceptionistPrices.com prices, with its entry plan, whether it publishes prices, and the date its pricing page was read. Use it to find a vendor's id. Source: ReceptionistPrices.com, prices checked October 26, 2026, https://www.receptionistprices.com/pricing/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| type | string | – | ai: AI receptionists; virtual: live people (and live plus AI); platform: build your own |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the ReceptionistPrices.com pricing MCP server?
ReceptionistPrices.com pricing is a hosted endpoint at https://www.receptionistprices.com/mcp/, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.receptionistprices.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-receptionistprices-pricing 'https://www.receptionistprices.com/mcp/'
What is the ReceptionistPrices.com pricing MCP server?
ReceptionistPrices.com pricing is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.receptionistprices/pricing. Dated AI and virtual receptionist prices, billing terms, integrations and hire-vs-AI costs. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.receptionistprices.com/mcp/).
Is the ReceptionistPrices.com pricing MCP server safe to use?
ReceptionistPrices.com pricing scores 71 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the ReceptionistPrices.com pricing MCP server expose?
ReceptionistPrices.com pricing exposes 6 tools: list_vendors, get_vendor_pricing, compare_at_volume, hire_vs_ai, integrations, category_range. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 807 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the ReceptionistPrices.com pricing MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to ReceptionistPrices.com pricing without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the ReceptionistPrices.com pricing MCP server still maintained?
ReceptionistPrices.com pricing is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.