RealMarket E-Signature Cost
REMOTE · TOOLS.REALMARKETLABS.COM
Compare e-signature costs per document and per year in Brazil (BRL) across providers.
Available components
Last scanned (11 hours ago)
Scores higher than 53% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability58
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 299 tokens (~299/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management3
- Stability observed for 1 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 4 Nov 26 68
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://tools.realmarketlabs.com/mcp/esign-cost
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=tools.realmarketlabs.com | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 8 Sept 2026 | 7 Dec 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 5d0b6502880ece5d7dc706ed3e12ac70df1 |
| SANs: tools.realmarketlabs.com | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of tools.realmarketlabs.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| realmarketlabs.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://tools.realmarketlabs.com/mcp/esign-cost | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://tools.realmarketlabs.com/mcp/esign-cost | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://tools.realmarketlabs.com/mcp/esign-cost |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare_esignature_costs Compare e-signature costs ~200
Calculates the current cost per signed document and per year, and compares it with the public prices of other e-signature providers for the same volume, in Brazilian reais. Also notes per-user licensing and the contract renewal window.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| confirm_unusual_cost | boolean | – | Set true only after the user confirms a cost per document that the tool flagged as unusually high. |
| contract_renewal | string | yes | When the current contract renews. |
| current_provider | string | yes | E-signature tool used today; 'none' if not using one yet. |
| documents_per_month | integer | yes | Documents sent per month. |
| monthly_cost_brl | number | yes | What the company pays per month today, in BRL (0 if none). |
| senders | integer | yes | People who send documents for signature. |
| who_sends | string | yes | Who sends: people on the team, an integrated system (API), or both. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the RealMarket E-Signature Cost MCP server?
RealMarket E-Signature Cost is a hosted endpoint at https://tools.realmarketlabs.com/mcp/esign-cost, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · tools.realmarketlabs.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-realmarketlabs-tools-esign-cost 'https://tools.realmarketlabs.com/mcp/esign-cost'
What is the RealMarket E-Signature Cost MCP server?
RealMarket E-Signature Cost is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.realmarketlabs.tools/esign-cost. Compare e-signature costs per document and per year in Brazil (BRL) across providers. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://tools.realmarketlabs.com/mcp/esign-cost).
Is the RealMarket E-Signature Cost MCP server safe to use?
RealMarket E-Signature Cost scores 68 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the RealMarket E-Signature Cost MCP server expose?
RealMarket E-Signature Cost exposes 1 tool: compare_esignature_costs. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 200 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the RealMarket E-Signature Cost MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to RealMarket E-Signature Cost without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the RealMarket E-Signature Cost MCP server still maintained?
RealMarket E-Signature Cost is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.