Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

com.rattlesnakesbymail/rattlesnakesbymail

REMOTE · RATTLESNAKESBYMAIL.COM · SCANNED OCT 5

Dated, sourced claims about AI crawlers and agents, offered as MCP tools.

+4 this week 78 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability79
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 582 tokens (~116/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management53
  • Stability observed for 16 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Install

How do I install the com.rattlesnakesbymail/rattlesnakesbymail MCP server?

com.rattlesnakesbymail/rattlesnakesbymail is a hosted endpoint at https://rattlesnakesbymail.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · rattlesnakesbymail.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-rattlesnakesbymail-rattlesnakesbymail 'https://rattlesnakesbymail.com/mcp'
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-rattlesnakesbymail-rattlesnakesbymail": {
      "url": "https://rattlesnakesbymail.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "com-rattlesnakesbymail-rattlesnakesbymail": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://rattlesnakesbymail.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.com-rattlesnakesbymail-rattlesnakesbymail]
url = "https://rattlesnakesbymail.com/mcp"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "com-rattlesnakesbymail-rattlesnakesbymail": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://rattlesnakesbymail.com/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add com-rattlesnakesbymail-rattlesnakesbymail --url 'https://rattlesnakesbymail.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  com-rattlesnakesbymail-rattlesnakesbymail:
    url: "https://rattlesnakesbymail.com/mcp"
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "com-rattlesnakesbymail-rattlesnakesbymail": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://rattlesnakesbymail.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add com-rattlesnakesbymail-rattlesnakesbymail -t streamable-http -u 'https://rattlesnakesbymail.com/mcp'
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-rattlesnakesbymail-rattlesnakesbymail": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://rattlesnakesbymail.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Sept 26 +7
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 26 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 24 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Oct 2026 · Probed https://rattlesnakesbymail.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=rattlesnakesbymail.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 23 Sept 2026 23 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 1d72054d6b774d45134c66165b4a9887
SANs: rattlesnakesbymail.com, w2yioj83niwpvj1e.rattlesnakesbymail.com, *.w2yioj83niwpvj1e.rattlesnakesbymail.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of rattlesnakesbymail.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
rattlesnakesbymail.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://rattlesnakesbymail.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://rattlesnakesbymail.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://rattlesnakesbymail.com/mcp
MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~527 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
ask ~100

Match a free-text question against the claims published on Rattlesnakes By Mail, and return the matching claims, or no match when no published claim covers the question. Every question sent to ask is recorded, and a recorded question may be published on the public questions page at Rattlesnakes By Mail. Do not send private or identifying text to ask.

NameTypeReqDescription
questionstringyesA free-text question about crawlers, agents, or claims.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

identify_user_agent ~74

Match an unrecognized raw User-Agent header against the crawlers documented on Rattlesnakes By Mail, and return the matched crawler plus instructions for verifying the request. Use identify_user_agent when the crawler behind the User-Agent header is not yet known.

NameTypeReqDescription
user_agentstringyesA raw User-Agent header string.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_changes ~115

List recorded changes to claims on Rattlesnakes By Mail, newest first, with the change date and the affected crawler. Filter by date with since, by crawler with entity, or by both. Use list_changes to detect crawler policy updates published after a given date.

NameTypeReqDescription
entitystring–An entity slug to filter changes to one crawler.
limitinteger–Maximum rows to return, up to 200.
sincestring–An ISO date; only changes on or after this date are returned.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

lookup_crawler ~94

Look up a documented crawler on Rattlesnakes By Mail by name, slug, or user-agent string, and return identity fields, current claims, publication dates, and evidence URLs. Use lookup_crawler when the crawler is already named, or when the user agent is already known to belong to a documented crawler.

NameTypeReqDescription
name_or_uastringyesA crawler name, slug, or full user-agent string.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

submit_note ~144

Submit a correction or note about a claim, an entity, or a question on Rattlesnakes By Mail. Requires a client token issued out of band by the publisher. Every note is stored as pending, and an editor reviews every pending note before publication.

NameTypeReqDescription
bodystringyesThe note text, up to 2000 characters.
target_idstringyesThe id or slug of the claim or entity, or the id or hash of the question, the note is about.
target_typestringyesThe kind of record the note is about.
tokenstringyesA client token issued by Rattlesnakes By Mail.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the com.rattlesnakesbymail/rattlesnakesbymail MCP server?

com.rattlesnakesbymail/rattlesnakesbymail is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.rattlesnakesbymail/rattlesnakesbymail. Dated, sourced claims about AI crawlers and agents, offered as MCP tools. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://rattlesnakesbymail.com/mcp).

Is the com.rattlesnakesbymail/rattlesnakesbymail MCP server safe to use?

com.rattlesnakesbymail/rattlesnakesbymail scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the com.rattlesnakesbymail/rattlesnakesbymail MCP server expose?

com.rattlesnakesbymail/rattlesnakesbymail exposes 5 tools: lookup_crawler, identify_user_agent, list_changes, ask, submit_note. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 527 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the com.rattlesnakesbymail/rattlesnakesbymail MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to com.rattlesnakesbymail/rattlesnakesbymail without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the com.rattlesnakesbymail/rattlesnakesbymail MCP server still maintained?

com.rattlesnakesbymail/rattlesnakesbymail is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.