Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Pickrate direct-booking hotels

REMOTE · PICK-RATE.COM

Hotels that book direct: search, live-availability links, and AI-agent readiness checks.

Available components

+3 this week 70 Trust /100

Last scanned (4 hours ago)

Scores higher than 55% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category E-commerce

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 352 tokens (~117/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management50
  • Stability observed for 15 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage81
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 42% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 4 Nov 26 +48
    • HSTS header: unverified → fail ▼ security
    • Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.47 ▲ functional
  • 3 Nov 26 −47
    • HSTS header: fail → unverified ▼ security
    • Authorization: partial → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.40 → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://pick-rate.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=pick-rate.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 18 Oct 2026 16 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 f4282f42fb7ce85813a72b9a65609fee
SANs: pick-rate.com, www.pick-rate.com, *.www.pick-rate.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of pick-rate.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
pick-rate.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://pick-rate.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://pick-rate.com/mcp Served over HTTP 200
MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~296 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_agent_readiness ~63

Scan any hotel or travel website and report how well AI agents can read, price and book it directly: a 0-100 score, what works, and the top fixes.

NameTypeReqDescription
urlstringyesThe hotel's website or its page inside a chain site

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_hotel ~71

Full details of one hotel from the Pickrate index by its id (from search_hotels), including policies, contact and a direct-booking link for given dates.

NameTypeReqDescription
adultsinteger––
checkinstring––
checkoutstring––
idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_hotels ~162

Search hotels that can be booked directly (no OTA commission) via Pickrate. Returns name, location, starting rate, amenities, cancellation terms and a direct-booking link. Use it when a traveller asks for a hotel in a city or area. Optionally pass dates and guests to get a booking link that opens live availability.

NameTypeReqDescription
adultsinteger––
checkinstring–YYYY-MM-DD
checkoutstring–YYYY-MM-DD
citystring––
countrystring––
max_pricenumber–Starting rate ceiling, in the hotel's currency
querystringyesFree text: city, area, hotel name, style (e.g. 'romantic boutique hotel Tel Aviv')

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Pickrate direct-booking hotels MCP server?

Pickrate direct-booking hotels is a hosted endpoint at https://pick-rate.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · pick-rate.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-pick-rate-hotels 'https://pick-rate.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Pickrate direct-booking hotels MCP server?

Pickrate direct-booking hotels is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.pick-rate/hotels. Hotels that book direct: search, live-availability links, and AI-agent readiness checks. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://pick-rate.com/mcp).

Is the Pickrate direct-booking hotels MCP server safe to use?

Pickrate direct-booking hotels scores 70 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Pickrate direct-booking hotels MCP server expose?

Pickrate direct-booking hotels exposes 3 tools: search_hotels, get_hotel, check_agent_readiness. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 296 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Pickrate direct-booking hotels MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Pickrate direct-booking hotels without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Pickrate direct-booking hotels MCP server still maintained?

Pickrate direct-booking hotels is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.