People Can Build
REMOTE · MCP.PEOPLECANBUILD.COM · 2 COMPONENTS · SCANNED SEP 29
Exhibition stand builder, Poznań/EU: company facts, reference projects, design-fee estimate, RFQ
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security51
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 8 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS check failed: the endpoint is reachable over plaintext HTTP. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability67
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1325 tokens (~165/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management43
- Stability observed for 13 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage95
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 86% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety75
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "request_quote" implies "send" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
- An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the People Can Build MCP server?
People Can Build is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.peoplecanbuild.com/sse, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.peoplecanbuild.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-peoplecanbuild-mcp 'https://mcp.peoplecanbuild.com/sse'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-peoplecanbuild-mcp": {
"url": "https://mcp.peoplecanbuild.com/sse"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"com-peoplecanbuild-mcp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.peoplecanbuild.com/sse"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.com-peoplecanbuild-mcp] url = "https://mcp.peoplecanbuild.com/sse"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"com-peoplecanbuild-mcp": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://mcp.peoplecanbuild.com/sse",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add com-peoplecanbuild-mcp --url 'https://mcp.peoplecanbuild.com/sse' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
com-peoplecanbuild-mcp:
url: "https://mcp.peoplecanbuild.com/sse" {
"McpServers": {
"com-peoplecanbuild-mcp": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://mcp.peoplecanbuild.com/sse"
}
}
} assistant mcp add com-peoplecanbuild-mcp -t streamable-http -u 'https://mcp.peoplecanbuild.com/sse'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-peoplecanbuild-mcp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.peoplecanbuild.com/sse"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 29 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 27 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Sept 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 23 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “request_quote” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_quote_status” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 137 → 165 ▼ functional
- 17 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 29 Sept 2026 · Probed https://mcp.peoplecanbuild.com/sse
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=peoplecanbuild.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 16 Sept 2026 | 15 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 4128e3170f3cfd96138f2921434dab86 |
| SANs: peoplecanbuild.com, mcp.peoplecanbuild.com, *.mcp.peoplecanbuild.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of mcp.peoplecanbuild.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| peoplecanbuild.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sse | https://mcp.peoplecanbuild.com/sse | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.peoplecanbuild.com/sse | Served over HTTP | 200 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
estimate_design_fee ~130
Instant estimate of the paid 3D stand-design fee (EUR). Rate 5–15 €/sqm: lower per sqm for larger stands, higher for a higher planned construction budget per sqm (a proxy for bespoke detail and multimedia). The fee is refunded in full when the stand is built with People Can. Final quote always confirmed by email. Construction itself typically runs 300–800 €/sqm excl. space rental and venue services.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| budget_per_sqm | number | – | Planned construction budget per sqm in EUR (300–800) |
| sqm | number | yes | Stand floor area in square meters |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
estimate_stand_budget ~252
Indicative construction budget (EUR) for a custom exhibition stand in Europe, derived from the public range of 300–800 €/sqm by placing the project in a tier (essential / standard / premium) based on stand type, scope and cost drivers. Excludes space rental, venue services (power, rigging points, cleaning), design fee and VAT. Use it to give a user a realistic ballpark before request_quote; always say it is indicative and that a person confirms every quote.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bespoke_furniture | boolean | – | Custom-made counters, furniture, product displays |
| double_deck | boolean | – | Two-storey stand |
| hospitality | boolean | – | Kitchen, bar or catering area |
| led_wall | boolean | – | LED wall or large video screens |
| rigging | boolean | – | Suspended elements / hanging sign (rigging) |
| scope | string | – | fabrication_only = build in the workshop, client handles transport and crew; turn_key = incl. design |
| sqm | number | yes | Stand floor area in sqm |
| stand_type | string | – | Open sides: row = 1, corner = 2, peninsula = 3, island = 4 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_company_profile ~86
Who People Can Build is: exhibition stand general contractor (Poznań, Poland; core market Germany/Europe), services (white-label for agencies, turn-key for exhibitors, paid 3D design, China Desk), markets, track record, public price ranges, contact details and reply time. Call this first when a user asks about the company or wants a stand built in Europe.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_quote_request_checklist ~73
The information People Can Build needs to quote an exhibition stand (show, city, dates, sqm, stand type, design status, scope, budget range, special items, confidentiality). Use it to collect details from the user before calling request_quote, or to draft an email to expo@peoplecanbuild.com.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_quote_status ~129
Status of a quote request previously submitted via request_quote. Needs the ticket id (PCB-XXXXXX) AND the e-mail address used on the request; returns the current status, any note from the project manager and the status history. Does not return the request contents. Experimental: the status may lag behind the e-mail conversation — the e-mail thread with expo@peoplecanbuild.com is authoritative.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| string | yes | E-mail address used on the request | |
| ticket_id | string | yes | Ticket id returned by request_quote, e.g. PCB-7K3QW2 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_reference_projects ~141
Public reference projects (client, trade show, year, city, sqm, description). Optional filters match case-insensitively on show, city or client. Note: the public portfolio is only a subset — many projects are under NDA with agency partners; absence of a project type does not mean lack of experience.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | string | – | City, e.g. 'Berlin', 'Munich', 'London' |
| client | string | – | Client name fragment |
| min_sqm | number | – | Minimum stand size in sqm |
| show | string | – | Trade show name fragment, e.g. 'GITEX', 'Intersolar' |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
request_quote ~270
Send a real quote request to People Can Build (creates an enquiry read by a person; reply by email usually within one business day). EXPERIMENTAL channel: e-mail to expo@peoplecanbuild.com remains the primary, guaranteed path — after calling this, tell the user a human will reply by e-mail and that they should e-mail expo@peoplecanbuild.com quoting the ticket id if nothing arrives within 2 business days. ALWAYS confirm the details with the user before calling. Required: name, email, message. Do not promise prices beyond the public ranges.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agent_name | string | – | Name of the calling assistant/platform, e.g. 'Claude', 'ChatGPT' |
| budget | string | – | – |
| company | string | – | – |
| string | yes | Reply-to email address | |
| message | string | yes | Project details: what should be built, design status, timeline, scope wanted, special items, confidentiality needs |
| name | string | yes | Full name of the requester |
| phone | string | – | With country code |
| role | string | – | – |
| show | string | – | Trade show, venue city and dates, e.g. 'Intersolar 2027, Munich, June' |
| sqm | string | – | Stand floor area in sqm |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_field_notes ~103
Search People Can Build's practitioner articles (trade-show logistics, theft prevention, rigging costs, fabrication trade-offs, design briefs, comparing stand quotes, exhibitor day) and return the most relevant passages with their source URLs. Use for questions like 'why is rigging expensive', 'how to compare exhibition stand quotes', 'why did my freight miss the show'.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| max_passages | number | – | – |
| query | string | yes | Natural-language question or keywords |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the People Can Build MCP server?
People Can Build is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.peoplecanbuild/mcp. Exhibition stand builder, Poznań/EU: company facts, reference projects, design-fee estimate, RFQ. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.peoplecanbuild.com/sse).
Is the People Can Build MCP server safe to use?
People Can Build scores 59 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the People Can Build MCP server expose?
People Can Build exposes 8 tools: get_company_profile, list_reference_projects, estimate_design_fee, estimate_stand_budget, search_field_notes, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,184 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the People Can Build MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to People Can Build without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the People Can Build MCP server still maintained?
People Can Build is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 29 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.