com.netentropyscore/coherence-signal
REMOTE · API.NETENTROPYSCORE.COM · SCANNED SEP 24
A brand's claim (website coherence) vs its reality (recent news), and the divergence.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 2 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability79
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 255 tokens (~127/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the com.netentropyscore/coherence-signal MCP server?
com.netentropyscore/coherence-signal is a hosted endpoint at https://api.netentropyscore.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · api.netentropyscore.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-netentropyscore-coherence-signal 'https://api.netentropyscore.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-netentropyscore-coherence-signal": {
"url": "https://api.netentropyscore.com/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"com-netentropyscore-coherence-signal": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://api.netentropyscore.com/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.com-netentropyscore-coherence-signal] url = "https://api.netentropyscore.com/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"com-netentropyscore-coherence-signal": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://api.netentropyscore.com/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add com-netentropyscore-coherence-signal --url 'https://api.netentropyscore.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
com-netentropyscore-coherence-signal:
url: "https://api.netentropyscore.com/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"com-netentropyscore-coherence-signal": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://api.netentropyscore.com/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add com-netentropyscore-coherence-signal -t streamable-http -u 'https://api.netentropyscore.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-netentropyscore-coherence-signal": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://api.netentropyscore.com/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 26 Aug 26 79
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Aug 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 31 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 30 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 27 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 26 Jul 26 0
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 24 Sept 2026 · Probed https://api.netentropyscore.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=api.netentropyscore.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 9 Sept 2026 | 8 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | b4e3f923eb0a4db51330ac59aa25effb |
| SANs: api.netentropyscore.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of api.netentropyscore.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| netentropyscore.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://api.netentropyscore.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://api.netentropyscore.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://api.netentropyscore.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare_brands ~64
Compare the NES coherence signal for several brands side by side (claim, reality, divergence for each). Presents the data; it does NOT recommend one brand over another. The caller decides.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| urls | array | yes | Brand URLs or domains to compare (up to 8). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| brands | array | – | – |
No examples provided.
get_brand_coherence ~124
Get the NES claim-vs-reality coherence signal for one brand: its website coherence score (the claim), recent public reality (matched news events), and the divergence between them. High divergence means the brand presents as coherent while its reality is turning negative. Directional opinion from public signal; not a fraud or financial check. Returns 'no read on file' for brands never scanned.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| brand | string | – | Brand name, used if no URL is given. |
| url | string | – | Brand website URL or domain, e.g. https://acme.com |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| brand | object | – | – |
| claim | object | – | What the brand says about itself via its website. |
| divergence | object | – | – |
| reality | object | – | – |
No examples provided.
What is the com.netentropyscore/coherence-signal MCP server?
com.netentropyscore/coherence-signal is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.netentropyscore/coherence-signal. A brand's claim (website coherence) vs its reality (recent news), and the divergence. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.netentropyscore.com/mcp).
Is the com.netentropyscore/coherence-signal MCP server safe to use?
com.netentropyscore/coherence-signal scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the com.netentropyscore/coherence-signal MCP server expose?
com.netentropyscore/coherence-signal exposes 2 tools: get_brand_coherence, compare_brands. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 188 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the com.netentropyscore/coherence-signal MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to com.netentropyscore/coherence-signal without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the com.netentropyscore/coherence-signal MCP server still maintained?
com.netentropyscore/coherence-signal is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.