Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Atlas · Name Abogados

REMOTE · ATLAS.NAMEABOGADOS.COM

Atlas de Name Abogados: documentos oficiales de derecho público colombiano con su ficha. Abierto.

+4 this week 71 Trust /100

Last scanned (9 hours ago)

Scores higher than 57% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Education and Research

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability52
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 905 tokens (~452/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management70
  • Stability observed for 21 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage97
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 91% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://atlas.nameabogados.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=nameabogados.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 13 Oct 2026 11 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 b67780a11f538e940e6213ab5d0f284b
SANs: nameabogados.com, atlas.nameabogados.com, *.atlas.nameabogados.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of atlas.nameabogados.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
nameabogados.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
x-content-type-options nosniff

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://atlas.nameabogados.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://atlas.nameabogados.com/mcp Inconclusive 405
MCP tools · 2 exposed · ~497 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
atlas_buscar ~357

Busca por relevancia en Atlas, el archivo de documentos oficiales de derecho público colombiano de Name Abogados (conceptos de Colombia Compra Eficiente, leyes, Constitución). Busca sobre la FICHA de cada documento: título, referencia, epígrafe, descriptores, resumen, problema jurídico, citas literales y normas relacionadas. Acepta frases temáticas («precios artificialmente bajos subasta inversa») y referencias («C-1237 de 2025»), que van primero, y números de norma («2.2.1.1.2.2.4», «Decreto 1082»). Sirve para FILTRAR: decidir qué documentos leer. Cada resultado trae el enlace al documento oficial, que es lo que se lee y se cita; la ficha la generó Atlas con herramientas automatizadas.

NameTypeReqDescription
autoridadstring–Autoridad emisora, p. ej. «Colombia Compra Eficiente».
descriptorstring–Descriptor del índice analítico, p. ej. «precios artificialmente bajos».
desdestring–Fecha del documento, desde (AAAA, AAAA-MM o AAAA-MM-DD).
hastastring–Fecha del documento, hasta (AAAA, AAAA-MM o AAAA-MM-DD).
ordenstring–Por omisión, relevancia. Por fecha sirve para reconstruir una línea doctrinal.
paginainteger–Página de resultados, desde 1.
por_paginainteger––
qstring–Texto libre. Entre comillas, frase exacta.
tipostring–Tipo documental: «concepto», «ley», «constitucion».

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

atlas_obtener ~140

La ficha completa de un documento, por referencia («C-1237 de 2025») o por slug: epígrafe, problema jurídico y resumen (generados por Atlas), citas literales del documento, descriptores, documentos relacionados y el enlace al documento oficial, que es donde se lee el texto completo.

NameTypeReqDescription
referenciastring–La referencia con que se cita, p. ej. «C-1237 de 2025», o el radicado. Sin año, devuelve los candidatos.
slugstring–El slug de la ficha, p. ej. «c-1237-de-2025».

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Atlas · Name Abogados MCP server?

Atlas · Name Abogados is a hosted endpoint at https://atlas.nameabogados.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · atlas.nameabogados.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-nameabogados-atlas 'https://atlas.nameabogados.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Atlas · Name Abogados MCP server?

Atlas · Name Abogados is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.nameabogados/atlas. Atlas de Name Abogados: documentos oficiales de derecho público colombiano con su ficha. Abierto. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://atlas.nameabogados.com/mcp).

Is the Atlas · Name Abogados MCP server safe to use?

Atlas · Name Abogados scores 71 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Atlas · Name Abogados MCP server expose?

Atlas · Name Abogados exposes 2 tools: atlas_buscar, atlas_obtener. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 497 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Atlas · Name Abogados MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Atlas · Name Abogados without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Atlas · Name Abogados MCP server still maintained?

Atlas · Name Abogados is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.