Conference Partner
REMOTE · WWW.MYHUIBAN.COM · SCANNED SEP 20
Conference & journal CFP deadlines, CCF/ICORE/QUALIS rankings, acceptance rates, research fields.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security89
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation is enforced on tool calls, but the challenge carries no valid RFC 9728 metadata, so a client cannot discover where to get a token. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability80
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1562 tokens (~195/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the Conference Partner MCP server?
Conference Partner is a hosted endpoint at https://www.myhuiban.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.myhuiban.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-myhuiban-www-conference-partner 'https://www.myhuiban.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-myhuiban-www-conference-partner": {
"url": "https://www.myhuiban.com/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"com-myhuiban-www-conference-partner": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://www.myhuiban.com/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.com-myhuiban-www-conference-partner] url = "https://www.myhuiban.com/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"com-myhuiban-www-conference-partner": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://www.myhuiban.com/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add com-myhuiban-www-conference-partner --url 'https://www.myhuiban.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
com-myhuiban-www-conference-partner:
url: "https://www.myhuiban.com/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"com-myhuiban-www-conference-partner": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://www.myhuiban.com/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add com-myhuiban-www-conference-partner -t streamable-http -u 'https://www.myhuiban.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-myhuiban-www-conference-partner": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://www.myhuiban.com/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 1 Sept 26 0
- “list_conferences” reworded the description of “ranking” cosmetic
1 cosmetic change on this day. Switch on “Show cosmetic changes” to see it.
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Aug 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 23 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Aug 26 0
- Tool “get_statistics” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 13 Aug 26 0
- Authorization: unverified → fail ▼ security
- Schema quality: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 327 → 180 ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- Stability: fail → 0.60 functional
- This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
- 12 Aug 26 0
- Authorization: fail → unverified ▼ security
- Stability: 0.53 → fail ▼ security
- Schema quality: 180 → 327 ▼ functional
- Schema quality: fail → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://www.myhuiban.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=myhuiban.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 27 Aug 2026 | 25 Nov 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 15307050ae9063770e0f8e2aca7f2fc5 |
| SANs: myhuiban.com, *.myhuiban.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of www.myhuiban.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| myhuiban.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication Challenged, unverified
The endpoint asked for a token, but we could not retrieve and validate the RFC 9728 metadata that tells a client how to obtain one.
| Result | Challenged, unverified |
|---|---|
| Enforced | On tool calls |
| HTTP status | 200 |
WWW-Authenticate challenge Bearer realm="huiban-mcp"
Bearer realm="huiban-mcp" | Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000 |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
Protected resource metadata
| Retrieved | No |
|---|---|
| Problem | no_resource_metadata |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.myhuiban.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.myhuiban.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://www.myhuiban.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_conference ~106
Get full details of a conference by id: basics, CFP text, acceptance-rate history, edition history, structured ratings and comments, related conferences/journals. REQUIRES CREDENTIALS: Authorization: Bearer <credential> (free API key from https://www.myhuiban.com/account/api-keys, or a JWT from POST /api/login). responses link to the Conference Partner detail_page, not the venue's external website.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | integer | yes | Conference id |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_journal ~101
Get full details of a journal by id: basics, CFP text, special issues, structured ratings and comments, related journals/conferences. REQUIRES CREDENTIALS: Authorization: Bearer <credential> (free API key from https://www.myhuiban.com/account/api-keys, or a JWT from POST /api/login). responses link to the Conference Partner detail_page, not the venue's external website.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | integer | yes | Journal id |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_researcher ~110
Get a researcher's public profile by id: name, institution, auto-generated research-interest summary, CV, tracked/attended conferences and tracked journals. REQUIRES CREDENTIALS: Authorization: Bearer <credential> (free API key from https://www.myhuiban.com/account/api-keys, or a JWT from POST /api/login). Never includes contact details; by id only — there is no researcher search or enumeration.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | integer | yes | Researcher (user) id |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_statistics ~85
Site-level public statistics: conference/journal totals, how many conferences have an open call for papers, upcoming deadlines by month, open CFPs by CCF / ICORE / QUALIS tier, conference country and research-field distributions, journal impact-factor, CCF-tier, publisher and research-field distributions. Research-field keys are the same slugs the search tools accept in their field parameter.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_conferences ~247
Browse conference lists and rankings (open CFPs, ranked venues with a call open now, popularity, most competitive, etc.), paginated. No keyword filtering — use search_conferences for that.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | integer | – | Page number, 1-based |
| per_page | integer | – | Items per page, max 100 |
| ranking | string | yes | cfp=open calls for papers; past_cfp=expired calls; ccf/core/qualis=venues in that tier whose submission deadline has not passed (for the whole tier catalogue use search_conferences with ccf_rank / co… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_journals ~122
Browse journal lists and rankings (special-issue CFPs, CCF, highest impact factor, popularity, all), paginated. No keyword filtering — use search_journals for that.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | integer | – | Page number, 1-based |
| per_page | integer | – | Items per page, max 100 |
| ranking | string | yes | cfp=special-issue calls for papers; ccf=CCF list; highest_if=highest impact factor; most_viewed/most_tracked=popularity; all=all journals |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_conferences ~283
Search academic conferences. Every parameter is optional — combine any of keyword, CCF/CORE/QUALIS rank, research field and submission/conference date ranges. Filter-only queries work fine (e.g. field=ai plus a submission-deadline window, no keyword). Returns a paginated list.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ccf_rank | string | – | CCF rank |
| conference_date_end | string | – | Conference date until (YYYY-MM-DD) |
| conference_date_start | string | – | Conference date from (YYYY-MM-DD) |
| core_rank | string | – | CORE rank |
| field | string | – | Research field (e.g. ai, security, systems, ee, energy) - see the field enum for the full list |
| page | integer | – | Page number, 1-based |
| per_page | integer | – | Items per page, max 100 |
| qualis_rank | string | – | QUALIS rank |
| query | string | – | Keyword, matched against short/full name |
| submission_date_end | string | – | Submission deadline until (YYYY-MM-DD) |
| submission_date_start | string | – | Submission deadline from (YYYY-MM-DD) |
| updated_since | string | – | Incremental sync: only venues changed on/after this date (YYYY-MM-DD). Day granularity. Use the updated_at field of the results as your next checkpoint. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_journals ~181
Search academic journals. Every parameter is optional — combine any of keyword, CCF rank, research field and ISSN. Returns a paginated list.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ccf_rank | string | – | CCF rank |
| field | string | – | Research field (e.g. ai, security, systems, ee, energy) - see the field enum for the full list |
| issn | string | – | ISSN (fuzzy match) |
| page | integer | – | Page number, 1-based |
| per_page | integer | – | Items per page, max 100 |
| query | string | – | Keyword, matched against short/full name |
| updated_since | string | – | Incremental sync: only venues changed on/after this date (YYYY-MM-DD). Day granularity. Use the updated_at field of the results as your next checkpoint. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the Conference Partner MCP server?
Conference Partner is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.myhuiban.www/conference-partner. Conference & journal CFP deadlines, CCF/ICORE/QUALIS rankings, acceptance rates, research fields. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.myhuiban.com/mcp).
Is the Conference Partner MCP server safe to use?
Conference Partner scores 90 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Conference Partner MCP server expose?
Conference Partner exposes 8 tools: search_conferences, search_journals, list_conferences, list_journals, get_conference, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,235 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Conference Partner MCP server require authentication?
Yes. Conference Partner asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.
Is the Conference Partner MCP server still maintained?
Conference Partner is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.