Moltline Recall
REMOTE · MCP.MOLTLINESTUDIO.COM · SCANNED SEP 21
A portable knowledge-graph memory you pass in and get back. No database. 4 of 6 free.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security83
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability63
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1893 tokens (~315/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the Moltline Recall MCP server?
Moltline Recall is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/recall, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.moltlinestudio.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-moltlinestudio-recall 'https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/recall'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-moltlinestudio-recall": {
"url": "https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/recall"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"com-moltlinestudio-recall": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/recall"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.com-moltlinestudio-recall] url = "https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/recall"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"com-moltlinestudio-recall": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/recall",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add com-moltlinestudio-recall --url 'https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/recall' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
com-moltlinestudio-recall:
url: "https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/recall" {
"McpServers": {
"com-moltlinestudio-recall": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/recall"
}
}
} assistant mcp add com-moltlinestudio-recall -t streamable-http -u 'https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/recall'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-moltlinestudio-recall": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/recall"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 19 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 17 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 6 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 4 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 21 Sept 2026 · Probed https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/recall
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=moltlinestudio.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 15 Aug 2026 | 13 Nov 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 72e09c6114448e7a0ed370fb03c277cb |
| SANs: moltlinestudio.com, *.moltlinestudio.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of mcp.moltlinestudio.com. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| moltlinestudio.com. | present | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| mcp.moltlinestudio.com. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=15576000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data:; font-src 'self' data:; connect-src 'self' https://api.moltlinestudio.com https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com; form-action 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; upgrade-insecure-requests |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/recall | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/recall | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/recall |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
graph_at_time Graph At Time ~331
See the memory as it stood on a given day, optionally faded by age. PREMIUM (license). Relations carrying since and until are filtered to those in force on the date; with a half-life, confidence decays exponentially with age so a two-year-old belief does not weigh the same as last week's. Typical input {"graph": {...}, "as_of": "2026-06-01", "half_life_days": 180} returns {"as_of": "2026-06-01", "graph": {...}, "dropped": {"not_yet": 1, "expired": 2}, "decayed": 4}. Use when the answer depends on when you ask. Not for what changed between two points - that is graph_diff, which does not need dates at all. Errors: on invalid, missing, or malformed input this tool never raises a protocol error — it returns {"error": "<what is wrong and how to fix it>"} (for example {"error": "as_of must be a date like 2026-06-01"}). Every call is read-only and idempotent, so after correcting the input it is always safe to retry.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| as_of | string | yes | The date to view the memory as of, ISO 8601, e.g. "2026-06-01". |
| graph | object | yes | The graph document. |
| half_life_days | integer | – | Days over which a relation's confidence halves. 0, the default, disables decay and leaves confidence untouched. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
graph_compact Graph Compact ~290
Shrink a memory to the part that still earns its place. PREMIUM (license). Ranks entities by how connected they are and how much is recorded about them, keeps anything you name outright, and drops the rest along with the relations that pointed at them. Typical input {"graph": {...}, "max_entities": 50, "keep": ["Acme Corp"]} returns {"graph": {...}, "kept": 50, "dropped_entities": ["Old Note", ...], "dropped_relations": 12, "ranking": "degree, then observation count, then name"}. Use when a graph has outgrown the context you can spend on it. Not for removing wrong facts - graph_lint finds those, and deleting them is a decision you should make deliberately rather than by ranking. Errors: on invalid, missing, or malformed input this tool never raises a protocol error — it returns {"error": "<what is wrong and how to fix it>"}. Every call is read-only and idempotent, so after correcting the input it is always safe to retry.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| graph | object | yes | The graph document to compact. |
| keep | – | – | Entity names to keep regardless of rank, e.g. ["Acme Corp"]. Matched case-insensitively. |
| max_entities | integer | – | How many entities to keep. Default 50. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
graph_diff Graph Diff ~215
Say exactly what changed between two versions of a memory. FREE. The audit trail a database gives you for free, without the database. Typical input {"before": {...}, "after": {...}} returns {"entities_added": ["Beta Ltd"], "entities_removed": [], "observations_added": {"Acme Corp": ["renewed in March"]}, "relations_added": [...], "changed": true}. Use after an upsert to record what a session learned, or between two agents to see what one knows that the other does not. Not for merging the two - feed the differences back through graph_upsert for that. Errors: on invalid, missing, or malformed input this tool never raises a protocol error — it returns {"error": "<what is wrong and how to fix it>"}. Every call is read-only and idempotent, so after correcting the input it is always safe to retry.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| after | object | yes | The later graph document. |
| before | object | yes | The earlier graph document. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
graph_lint Graph Lint ~239
Find the breaks a memory graph accumulates as it grows. FREE. Relations pointing at entities that do not exist, entities nothing points at, near-duplicate names, and observations that contradict each other on the same entity. Typical input {"graph": {...}} returns {"ok": false, "dangling_relations": [{"from": "Acme Corp", "to": "Beta Ltd", "missing": ["Beta Ltd"]}], "orphan_entities": ["Old Note"], "near_duplicates": [["Acme Corp", "Acme Corp."]], "contradictions": []}. Use before trusting a graph you did not build, or on a schedule as memory grows. Not for comparing two graphs (graph_diff) and not for shrinking one (graph_compact). Errors: on invalid, missing, or malformed input this tool never raises a protocol error — it returns {"error": "<what is wrong and how to fix it>"}. Every call is read-only and idempotent, so after correcting the input it is always safe to retry.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| graph | object | yes | The graph document to check. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
graph_search Graph Search ~361
Find what the graph knows about something, plus its neighbourhood. FREE. Scores entities by how many query words appear in the name, type and observations, then pulls in whatever is within the requested number of hops - because the useful answer to "what do we know about Acme" is usually Acme plus who it is connected to. Typical input {"graph": {...}, "query": "acme renewal", "hops": 1} returns {"matches": [{"name": "Acme Corp", "score": 3, "why": ["name", "observation"]}], "neighbourhood": {"entities": [...], "relations": [...]}, "hops": 1}. Use to read memory back before answering. Not for writing (graph_upsert) and not for narrowing by date, which graph_at_time does. Errors: on invalid, missing, or malformed input this tool never raises a protocol error — it returns {"error": "<what is wrong and how to fix it>"} (for example {"error": "query must contain at least one word or number"}). Every call is read-only and idempotent, so after correcting the input it is always safe to retry.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| graph | object | yes | The graph document to search. |
| hops | integer | – | How far to expand from each match along relations. 0 returns matches only; 3 is the maximum. Default 1. |
| limit | integer | – | Maximum entities to return. Default 20, maximum 200. |
| query | string | yes | Words to look for, e.g. "acme renewal". Matching is on whole lowercase words, so it is exact and repeatable rather than fuzzy. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
graph_upsert Graph Upsert ~389
Fold new facts into a memory graph and get the whole graph back. FREE. Idempotent by construction: re-adding the same entity, observation or relation changes nothing, so an agent that replays its own history does not end up with a graph full of duplicates. Typical input {"graph": {"entities": [], "relations": []}, "entities": [{"name": "Acme Corp", "type": "company", "observations": ["renewed in March"]}]} returns {"graph": {...}, "added": {"entities": 1, "observations": 1, "relations": 0}, "merged": 0}. Use as the single write path for memory. Not for reading it back selectively - that is graph_search - and not for finding out what a write changed, which graph_diff answers precisely. Errors: on invalid, missing, or malformed input this tool never raises a protocol error — it returns {"error": "<what is wrong and how to fix it>"} (for example {"error": "graph exceeds <value> entities; split it"}). Every call is read-only and idempotent, so after correcting the input it is always safe to retry.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| entities | – | – | Entities to add or extend, each {"name": ..., "type": ..., "observations": [...]}. Observations are appended and deduplicated; an existing entity keeps its type unless a new one is supplied. |
| graph | – | – | The existing graph document, or omitted to start a new one. Shape: {"entities": [...], "relations": [...]}. |
| relations | – | – | Relations to add, each {"from": ..., "to": ..., "type": ..., and optionally "since", "until", "confidence"}. Dates are ISO 8601 (YYYY-MM-DD); confidence is 0 to 1. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
What is the Moltline Recall MCP server?
Moltline Recall is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.moltlinestudio/recall. A portable knowledge-graph memory you pass in and get back. No database. 4 of 6 free. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/recall).
Is the Moltline Recall MCP server safe to use?
Moltline Recall scores 87 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Moltline Recall MCP server expose?
Moltline Recall exposes 6 tools: graph_upsert, graph_search, graph_diff, graph_lint, graph_at_time, graph_compact. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,825 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Moltline Recall MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Moltline Recall without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Moltline Recall MCP server still maintained?
Moltline Recall is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 21 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.