Moltline Merchant Maths
REMOTE · MCP.MOLTLINESTUDIO.COM · SCANNED SEP 21
Processor fees, charge-to-net, invoice totals and proration. 3 of 6 tools free.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security83
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability62
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1823 tokens (~303/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety75
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "charge_to_net" implies "charge" and declares readOnlyHint instead, contradicting what its own name says it does. See how to fix → Fail
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the Moltline Merchant Maths MCP server?
Moltline Merchant Maths is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/merchant, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.moltlinestudio.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-moltlinestudio-merchant 'https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/merchant'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-moltlinestudio-merchant": {
"url": "https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/merchant"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"com-moltlinestudio-merchant": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/merchant"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.com-moltlinestudio-merchant] url = "https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/merchant"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"com-moltlinestudio-merchant": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/merchant",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add com-moltlinestudio-merchant --url 'https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/merchant' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
com-moltlinestudio-merchant:
url: "https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/merchant" {
"McpServers": {
"com-moltlinestudio-merchant": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/merchant"
}
}
} assistant mcp add com-moltlinestudio-merchant -t streamable-http -u 'https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/merchant'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-moltlinestudio-merchant": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/merchant"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 16 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 14 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 7 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 5 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 21 Sept 2026 · Probed https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/merchant
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=moltlinestudio.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 15 Aug 2026 | 13 Nov 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 72e09c6114448e7a0ed370fb03c277cb |
| SANs: moltlinestudio.com, *.moltlinestudio.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of mcp.moltlinestudio.com. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| moltlinestudio.com. | present | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| mcp.moltlinestudio.com. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=15576000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data:; font-src 'self' data:; connect-src 'self' https://api.moltlinestudio.com https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com; form-action 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; upgrade-insecure-requests |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/merchant | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/merchant | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/merchant |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
charge_to_net Charge To Net ~280
Compute the gross price to charge so you net a target after fees. FREE. 'Charge X to receive Y' after percentage + fixed processor fees. Typical input {"net_target": 100, "pct_fee": 2.9, "fixed_fee": 0.30} returns {"charge": 103.4, "fee": 3.4, "net": 100.0}. The inverse of processor_fees - solves for gross from a target net. Use when the payout is the fixed requirement. Not when the price is already set. Errors: on invalid, missing, or malformed input this tool never raises a protocol error — it returns {"error": "<what is wrong and how to fix it>"} (for example {"error": "net_target > 0 and pct_fee < 100 required"}). Every call is read-only and idempotent, so after correcting the input it is always safe to retry.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| fixed_fee | number | – | Processor fixed fee per charge. Default 0.30. |
| net_target | number | yes | The amount you want to receive after fees; must be greater than 0. |
| pct_fee | number | – | Processor percentage fee, below 100, e.g. 2.9 for 2.9%. Default 2.9. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
discount_stack Discount Stack ~268
Stack discounts correctly: sequential vs additive comparison. PREMIUM (license). The two methods differ — this shows both, the final price, and the true total discount. Typical input {"price": 200, "discounts_pct": [20, 10]} returns {"original": 200, "sequential_price": 144.0, "sequential_total_discount_pct": 28.0, "additive_price": 140.0, "difference": 4.0, "note": "..."}. Use when more than one discount applies and the order changes the answer. Not for a single discount inside an invoice (invoice_total). Errors: on invalid, missing, or malformed input this tool never raises a protocol error — it returns {"error": "<what is wrong and how to fix it>"} (for example {"error": "price > 0 and at least one discount required"}). Every call is read-only and idempotent, so after correcting the input it is always safe to retry.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| discounts_pct | array | yes | Discount percentages in the order applied, at least one, e.g. [20, 10] for 20% then 10%. |
| price | number | yes | Original price before discounts; must be greater than 0. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
installment_plan Installment Plan ~264
Split a total into an installment schedule with optional deposit. PREMIUM (license). Rounding remainders land on the final payment so the schedule always sums exactly. Typical input {"total": 1000, "installments": 3, "deposit_pct": 10} returns {"deposit": 100.0, "payments": [300.0, 300.0, 300.0], "check_sum": 1000.0}. Use when one total is paid across scheduled dates. Not for partial-period adjustments (proration). Errors: on invalid, missing, or malformed input this tool never raises a protocol error — it returns {"error": "<what is wrong and how to fix it>"} (for example {"error": "total > 0 and 1-36 installments"}). Every call is read-only and idempotent, so after correcting the input it is always safe to retry.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| deposit_pct | number | – | Optional upfront deposit as a percentage of total, e.g. 10 for 10%. Default 0. |
| installments | integer | yes | Number of payments after the deposit; 1 to 36. |
| total | number | yes | Full amount to split; must be greater than 0. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
invoice_total Invoice Total ~325
Total an invoice: per-line totals, subtotal, discount, tax, grand total. FREE. Typical input {"line_items": [{"desc": "Design", "qty": 2, "unit_price": 50}], "tax_pct": 8.5, "discount_pct": 10} returns {"lines": [{"desc": "Design", "qty": 2, "unit_price": 50, "line_total": 100.0}], "subtotal": 100.0, "discount": 10.0, "tax": 7.65, "total": 97.65}. Use when several line items roll up with discount and tax. Not for one transaction's fees (processor_fees) and not for spreading a total over time (installment_plan). Errors: on invalid, missing, or malformed input this tool never raises a protocol error — it returns {"error": "<what is wrong and how to fix it>"} (for example {"error": "line_items must contain at least one item,"}). Every call is read-only and idempotent, so after correcting the input it is always safe to retry.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| discount_pct | number | – | Discount percentage applied to the subtotal. Default 0. |
| line_items | array | yes | At least one line item object {"desc": str, "qty": number, "unit_price": number}; the first 100 items are used. |
| tax_pct | number | – | Tax percentage applied after the discount, e.g. 8.5. Default 0. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
processor_fees Processor Fees ~348
Break down payment-processor fees: fee, net, and effective rate. FREE. Uses editable presets for stripe/paypal/square/shopify (verify current rates) or your own custom_pct + custom_fixed. Typical input {"amount": 1000, "processor": "stripe", "transactions": 10} returns {"gross": 1000, "fee": 32.0, "net": 968.0, "effective_rate_pct": 3.2, "note": "..."}. Use when the charge amount is known and the net payout is the question. Not for the reverse: the gross needed to net a target is charge_to_net. Errors: on invalid, missing, or malformed input this tool never raises a protocol error — it returns {"error": "<what is wrong and how to fix it>"} (for example {"error": "amount must be > 0, transactions >= 1"}). Every call is read-only and idempotent, so after correcting the input it is always safe to retry.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| amount | number | yes | Total gross amount processed; must be greater than 0. |
| custom_fixed | number | – | Fixed per-transaction fee used when processor is "custom", e.g. 0.25. |
| custom_pct | number | – | Percentage fee used when processor is "custom", e.g. 2.5 for 2.5%. |
| processor | string | – | One of "stripe", "paypal", "square", "shopify", or "custom". Default "stripe". |
| transactions | integer | – | How many transactions the amount is spread across; at least 1. Default 1. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
proration Proration ~296
Compute a prorated charge or refund for a partial billing period. PREMIUM (license). Typical input {"amount_per_period": 90, "days_used": 10, "days_in_period": 30} returns {"days_used": 10, "days_in_period": 30, "prorated_charge": 30.0, "prorated_refund": 60.0, "answer": 30.0}. Use when a plan starts, ends, or changes mid-period. Not for splitting a full amount into scheduled payments (installment_plan). Errors: on invalid, missing, or malformed input this tool never raises a protocol error — it returns {"error": "<what is wrong and how to fix it>"} (for example {"error": "need amount > 0 and 0 <= days_used <= days_in_period"}). Every call is read-only and idempotent, so after correcting the input it is always safe to retry.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| amount_per_period | number | yes | Full-period price; must be greater than 0. |
| days_in_period | integer | – | Length of the billing period in days; at least 1. Default 30. |
| days_used | integer | yes | Days of the period consumed; 0 to days_in_period. |
| refund_mode | boolean | – | If true, "answer" is the refund amount instead of the charge. Default false. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
What is the Moltline Merchant Maths MCP server?
Moltline Merchant Maths is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.moltlinestudio/merchant. Processor fees, charge-to-net, invoice totals and proration. 3 of 6 tools free. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.moltlinestudio.com/merchant).
Is the Moltline Merchant Maths MCP server safe to use?
Moltline Merchant Maths scores 85 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Moltline Merchant Maths MCP server expose?
Moltline Merchant Maths exposes 6 tools: processor_fees, charge_to_net, invoice_total, discount_stack, proration, installment_plan. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,781 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Moltline Merchant Maths MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Moltline Merchant Maths without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Moltline Merchant Maths MCP server still maintained?
Moltline Merchant Maths is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 21 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.