com.missionforhire/mission-quotes
REMOTE · MISSIONFORHIRE.COM · SCANNED SEP 27
Quote a proxy-presence mission: what a real person on the ground in city X costs.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 4 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability79
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 341 tokens (~85/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management47
- Stability observed for 14 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the com.missionforhire/mission-quotes MCP server?
com.missionforhire/mission-quotes is a hosted endpoint at https://missionforhire.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · missionforhire.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-missionforhire-mission-quotes 'https://missionforhire.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-missionforhire-mission-quotes": {
"url": "https://missionforhire.com/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"com-missionforhire-mission-quotes": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://missionforhire.com/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.com-missionforhire-mission-quotes] url = "https://missionforhire.com/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"com-missionforhire-mission-quotes": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://missionforhire.com/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add com-missionforhire-mission-quotes --url 'https://missionforhire.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
com-missionforhire-mission-quotes:
url: "https://missionforhire.com/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"com-missionforhire-mission-quotes": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://missionforhire.com/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add com-missionforhire-mission-quotes -t streamable-http -u 'https://missionforhire.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-missionforhire-mission-quotes": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://missionforhire.com/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 27 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Sept 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 23 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 14 Sept 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 27 Sept 2026 · Probed https://missionforhire.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=missionforhire.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 13 Aug 2026 | 11 Nov 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 101c2c2fcce153140e754a41625a5ea7 |
| SANs: missionforhire.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of missionforhire.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| missionforhire.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://missionforhire.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://missionforhire.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://missionforhire.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
city_missions ~42
Every mission priced for one city, side by side, so the user can compare what is possible there.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | string | yes | City slug or plain name |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_cities ~54
Which cities are already priced, with distance from the Paris anchor and travel band. Call this when the user names a city you cannot match, to pick the nearest listed anchor.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| region | string | – | Optional region filter |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_missions ~51
Which kinds of mission will a person on the ground actually carry out, and what proof does each one return? Call this when the user's request is free text and you need to map it to a mission slug.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
quote_mission ~108
What does it cost to send one real person to a named city to carry out one mission and bring back proof? Returns the indicative from-price in EUR, billable days, travel band, distance and proof format. Both mission and city are required; neither alone produces a valid answer. Do not estimate this yourself.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | string | yes | City slug or plain name, e.g. manila or Manila |
| mission | string | yes | Mission slug, e.g. grave-visit |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the com.missionforhire/mission-quotes MCP server?
com.missionforhire/mission-quotes is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.missionforhire/mission-quotes. Quote a proxy-presence mission: what a real person on the ground in city X costs. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://missionforhire.com/mcp).
Is the com.missionforhire/mission-quotes MCP server safe to use?
com.missionforhire/mission-quotes scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the com.missionforhire/mission-quotes MCP server expose?
com.missionforhire/mission-quotes exposes 4 tools: quote_mission, list_missions, list_cities, city_missions. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 255 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the com.missionforhire/mission-quotes MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to com.missionforhire/mission-quotes without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the com.missionforhire/mission-quotes MCP server still maintained?
com.missionforhire/mission-quotes is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 27 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.