Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

mesh-01 / aethelon-nexus

REMOTE · MESH-01.COM · 2 COMPONENTS

Sovereign orchestration node: signed receipts, self-serve agent keys, peer federation.

+3 this week 76 Trust /100

Last scanned (11 hours ago)

Scores higher than 66% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Crypto and Web3

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability65
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 719 tokens (~79/item across 9 items; 9 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management53
  • Stability observed for 16 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 9 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 10 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1
    • HSTS header: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
    • Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
    • MCP protocol: unverified → fail ▼ functional
    • Endpoint reachability: unreachable → reachable ▲ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.53 ▲ functional
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
  • 3 Nov 26 0
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → unreachable ▼ security
    • Authorization: partial → unverified ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.43 → unverified ▼ security
    • HSTS header: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Capabilities: fail → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 −3
    • Authorization: fail → partial ▲ security
  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mesh-01.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=mesh-01.com CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 15 Oct 2026 13 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6259b87e146f962ff70af869fbedded28b5
SANs: mesh-01.com
CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mesh-01.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
mesh-01.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options SAMEORIGIN
referrer-policy no-referrer-when-downgrade

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mesh-01.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mesh-01.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://mesh-01.com/mcp
MCP tools · 9 exposed · ~621 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
nexus_arbitrage_quote ~188

Quote a DEX arbitrage route — simulation only, no trades executed. Modes: direct (token_in/token_out/dex_source/dex_target/max_slippage/amount_in), triangular (legs[3]), scan (routes[]).

NameTypeReqDescription
amount_innumber–input amount in token_in units
chainstring–blockchain network (e.g. base)
dex_sourcestring–source DEX identifier
dex_targetstring–target DEX identifier
legsarray–3 swap legs for triangular mode
max_slippagenumber–maximum slippage fraction
modestring–direct|triangular|scan
routesarray–candidate routes for scan mode
token_instring–input token symbol or address
token_outstring–output token symbol or address

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

nexus_coordinate ~128

Submit a durable async task to this mesh node. Returns a task_id; poll nexus_task_status or supply callback_url for push delivery. Every finished task issues an Ed25519-signed, hash-chained receipt.

NameTypeReqDescription
callback_urlstring–public HTTPS URL invoked with the signed result on finish
enginestring–engine to run: arbitrage|micro_saas|signal_scan|webhook|delegate|generic
payload_valuenumber–declared value of the task, for telemetry and billing
vector_data––engine-specific payload (object or JSON string)
NameTypeReqDescription
statusstring––
task_idstring––

No examples provided.

nexus_health ~23

Node health: RAM usage, durable queue depth, task counts by state.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

nexus_mesh_delegate ~108

Delegate a task to a peer node in the mesh (peer = node_id or endpoint_url). The peer executes and returns a receipt through the federation protocol.

NameTypeReqDescription
callback_urlstring–public HTTPS URL for the signed result
payload_valuenumber–declared task value
peerstringyespeer node_id or endpoint URL
vector_data––inner payload for the peer (object or JSON string)
vector_typestring–task type the peer understands

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

nexus_mesh_peers ~26

List active mesh peers. Authenticated callers also see private peers not announced publicly.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
peersarray––

No examples provided.

nexus_opportunities ~29

Latest results from the node's autonomous arbitrage scanner. Simulated findings — reported, not promised.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

nexus_signal_scan ~51

Concurrently probe public HTTPS endpoints and extract fields via dotted paths. Public targets only (SSRF-guarded).

NameTypeReqDescription
signalsarrayyeslist of signal specs: url, method, fields to extract

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

nexus_stats ~27

Per-engine telemetry: invocation counts, p50/p99 latency in ms, cumulative declared value.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

nexus_task_status ~41

Get status and result of a task by task_id. Finished tasks include their signed receipt.

NameTypeReqDescription
task_idstringyestask id returned by nexus_coordinate
NameTypeReqDescription
statusstring––
task_idstring––

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the mesh-01 / aethelon-nexus MCP server?

mesh-01 / aethelon-nexus is a hosted endpoint at https://mesh-01.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mesh-01.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-mesh-01-aethelon-nexus 'https://mesh-01.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the mesh-01 / aethelon-nexus MCP server?

mesh-01 / aethelon-nexus is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.mesh-01/aethelon-nexus. Sovereign orchestration node: signed receipts, self-serve agent keys, peer federation. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mesh-01.com/mcp).

Is the mesh-01 / aethelon-nexus MCP server safe to use?

mesh-01 / aethelon-nexus scores 76 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the mesh-01 / aethelon-nexus MCP server expose?

mesh-01 / aethelon-nexus exposes 9 tools: nexus_coordinate, nexus_task_status, nexus_arbitrage_quote, nexus_signal_scan, nexus_mesh_delegate, and 4 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 621 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the mesh-01 / aethelon-nexus MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to mesh-01 / aethelon-nexus without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the mesh-01 / aethelon-nexus MCP server still maintained?

mesh-01 / aethelon-nexus is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.