Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Mentionry

REMOTE · MENTIONRY.COM

Find who links to your competitors but not you, judge each opening, and draft the pitch.

Available components

0 this week 89 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 hours ago)

Scores higher than 97% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 17 Oct 2026.

Category Marketing and SEO

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security89
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2171 tokens (~114/item across 19 items; 19 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage87
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 60% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 19 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 20 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 30 Sept 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 26 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 24 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Sept 26 −5
    • Stability: pass → 0.67 functional
  • 15 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 17 Oct 2026 · Probed https://mentionry.com/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=mentionry.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 12 Oct 2026 10 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 ace470037904c62313c11e64e4dfccdf
SANs: mentionry.com, *.mentionry.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mentionry.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
mentionry.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Challenged, unverified

The endpoint asked for a token, but we could not retrieve and validate the RFC 9728 metadata that tells a client how to obtain one.

Result Challenged, unverified
Enforced On tool calls
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; frame-ancestors 'self'; object-src 'none'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self' data:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://va.vercel-scripts.com; connect-src 'self' https: wss:
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options SAMEORIGIN
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()

Protected resource metadata

Retrieved No
Problem no_resource_metadata

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mentionry.com/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mentionry.com/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://mentionry.com/api/mcp
MCP tools · 19 exposed · ~1,914 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
backlink_gap ~69

Find pages that link to the named competitors but not to you, classified by whether a link is realistically winnable and why. Competitors are excluded from their own results: a competitor is never a prospect.

NameTypeReqDescription
competitorsarray–Up to five competitor domains.
domainstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

describe_agent ~66

What one agent does, step by step, and what it needs: the values you must pass to run_agent, what it hands back, how many of its steps reach a vendor that charges, and anything currently stopping it from running.

NameTypeReqDescription
agent_idstringyesFrom list_agents.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

discover_competitors ~68

Find the domains competing with this one, from both search results and link profile overlap. Returns each candidate with the evidence for it, so a wrong suggestion can be recognised rather than trusted.

NameTypeReqDescription
domainstringyes–
keywordsarray–Optional. Sharpens the search half.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

draft_pitch ~127

Write one outreach email for one prospect, in your own words, using the reason that prospect would link to you. It returns the subject and body and sends nothing: sending happens from your own mailbox, after you have read it. Requires a paid Mentionry plan.

NameTypeReqDescription
descriptionstring–What your site does.
hookstringyesWhy this page would link to you.
page_titlestring––
prospect_urlstringyesThe page you want the link on.
sender_namestring––
sender_sitestringyesYour domain.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_prospects ~106

Search the open web for pages that would plausibly link to this site: resource pages, roundups, listicles and directories in its subject. Returns each with the reason it was kept.

NameTypeReqDescription
audiencestring––
descriptionstring–What the site does. Use read_site if you do not have one.
domainstringyes–
keywordsarray––
topicstring–Optional. Narrows the search to one theme.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

generate_image ~183

Make one picture from a description: a product shot, a social visual, hero art, an ad creative, an illustration for a page or an email. Returns its public address, which write_landing_page and write_email_template accept and which you link to in your reply; the product draws it under this tool's row. Spends one image allowance (quality 'best' costs about five times more; use it only when asked).

NameTypeReqDescription
aspect_ratiostring–Default 1:1. 16:9 for a hero, 9:16 for a story, 4:3 for a card.
promptstringyesWhat to draw, specifically: subject, setting, style, lighting, colours, mood. Name the brand's colours when you know them. No text inside the image unless asked.
qualitystring–Default fast.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

generate_video ~200

Make one short clip (three to eight seconds; 480p by default, 720p with quality 'best' at several times the cost) from a description, optionally animating a picture generate_image already made by passing its address as first_frame_url. Renders in one to two minutes and returns its public address; the product plays it under this tool's row. Spends one video allowance, the dearest single action here, so confirm the description with the customer before calling it. Requires a paid Mentionry plan.

NameTypeReqDescription
aspect_ratiostring–Default 16:9. 9:16 for a story or a reel.
first_frame_urlstring–Optional. The /m/... address of a generated picture to animate.
promptstringyesThe motion and the scene: what moves, camera, pace, mood.
qualitystring–Default fast.
secondsinteger–Default 5.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_agents ~52

The agents on this account: what each is called, how many steps it has, whether it would run as it stands, and when it last changed. Call describe_agent next to learn what one needs before running it.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_connections ~50

Which outside tools this account has connected, and what each one is allowed to do here. Call it before offering to file, post or draft anything, so you can say what is actually available instead of guessing.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_documents ~46

The documents your agents have produced: what each is called, which agent wrote it, how long it is and how many versions it has. Pass an id to read_document for the text.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_media ~27

The pictures and clips already generated on this account, newest first, with their addresses. Free.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

qualify_domain ~87

Judge whether a domain is worth running link building for at all, from live search data. Returns a verdict, the measured signals behind it, and the honest case against. This is the same free diagnostic the dashboard runs, and for a large share of sites the answer is that the niche has nothing to mine.

NameTypeReqDescription
domainstringyesThe domain to judge, for example mentionry.com

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

read_document ~72

The text of one document your agent wrote, with the agent, the step and the values that run was given. Returns the newest version unless an older one is asked for.

NameTypeReqDescription
document_idstringyesFrom list_documents.
versionnumber–1 is the newest. Omit for the newest.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

read_site ~65

Read a domain and return what we think it is about: a description, its audience, and the keywords it should be found for. This is the brief every other tool takes as input, so call it first when you do not already have one.

NameTypeReqDescription
domainstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

read_visibility ~129

The account's own answer-engine measurements over a window: how often each tracked brand appears in recorded answers (visibility), its share of all mentions (share of voice), its mean position, and the ranking against named competitors. Group by day for a trend, or by model, region, persona, prompt or topic to find where a brand is weak. This is the data behind the dashboard's Answer Engine Insights.

NameTypeReqDescription
daysnumber–Window length in days. Default 30.
dimensionstringyesHow to group. `day` for a trend over time; the others compare buckets.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

run_agent ~101

Run one of your agents once and return what every step did, in order, with what it returned and how long it took. Pass its declared inputs as an object keyed by their `key` from describe_agent. Steps that reach a paid vendor are counted against your live-sweep allowance, one each.

NameTypeReqDescription
agent_idstringyesFrom list_agents.
inputsobject–The agent's declared inputs, keyed by `key`. Values are strings.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

verify_links ~79

Check a list of domains against your live backlink profile and report which of them now link to you, when the link first appeared, and whether it is still there. A link that was removed shows as a change rather than staying on the scoreboard.

NameTypeReqDescription
domainstringyesYour domain.
pitchedarrayyesThe domains or URLs you pitched.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

write_email_template ~183

Write a complete HTML marketing email (tables and inline styles, so it renders in Outlook and Gmail) from a brief and file it in Documents for preview. Grounded in the brand kit when one exists. The result can go into the customer's Gmail drafts with create_email_draft or be sent through an app action, both of which ask first. Spends one draft allowance.

NameTypeReqDescription
audiencestring––
cta_textstring––
cta_urlstring––
goalstringyes–
imagesarray–/m/... addresses from generate_image.
notesstring––
offerstring––
preheaderstring––
sectionsarray––
titlestringyesThe template's name in Documents and the subject line.
tonestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

write_landing_page ~204

Write a complete, responsive landing page as HTML from a brief and file it in Documents, where the customer previews it. Grounded in the brand kit when one exists. Pass the addresses of pictures you generated so the page uses them. It is private until publish_page. Spends one draft allowance.

NameTypeReqDescription
audiencestring––
cta_textstring––
cta_urlstring––
goalstringyesWhat the page must make the reader do, in one sentence.
imagesarray–/m/... addresses from generate_image, in the order to use them.
notesstring–Anything else to honour: colours, length, what to avoid.
offerstring––
sectionsarray–The sections wanted, in order, each in a few words.
titlestringyesThe page's name in Documents and its <title>.
tonestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Mentionry MCP server?

Mentionry is a hosted endpoint at https://mentionry.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mentionry.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-mentionry-mentionry 'https://mentionry.com/api/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Mentionry MCP server?

Mentionry is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.mentionry/mentionry. Find who links to your competitors but not you, judge each opening, and draft the pitch. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mentionry.com/api/mcp).

Is the Mentionry MCP server safe to use?

Mentionry scores 89 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Mentionry MCP server expose?

Mentionry exposes 19 tools: qualify_domain, read_site, discover_competitors, backlink_gap, find_prospects, and 14 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,914 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Mentionry MCP server require authentication?

Yes. Mentionry asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.

Is the Mentionry MCP server still maintained?

Mentionry is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 17 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.