com.lucidrents/building-intelligence
REMOTE · LUCIDRENTS.COM
Building intelligence for NYC, LA, Chicago rentals: violations, 311, reviews, rents, landlords.
Available components
Last scanned (10 hours ago)
Scores higher than 96% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Maps and Location
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability75
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 824 tokens (~164/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 16 Sept 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 18 Aug 26 0
- Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- Tool “get_building_report” now declares an output schema ▲ functional
- Tool “get_landlord_record” now declares an output schema ▲ functional
- Tool “get_neighborhood_stats” now declares an output schema ▲ functional
- Tool “get_review_summary” now declares an output schema ▲ functional
- Tool “search_buildings” now declares an output schema ▲ functional
- First check of Tool coverage: 100 functional
- 17 Aug 26 0
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://lucidrents.com/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=lucidrents.com | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 31 Oct 2026 | 29 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 6981074364a0bd4c7a53993c5257a46eead |
| SANs: *.lucidrents.com, lucidrents.com | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of lucidrents.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| lucidrents.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(self) |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://lucidrents.com/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://lucidrents.com/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://lucidrents.com/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_building_report Get building report ~172
Full report card for one building: LucidIQ score and letter grade, HPD/DOB violation counts, 311 complaint total, top violation categories (pests, heat, leaks, ...), review count and average rating, rent summary by bedroom count, rent stabilization, landlord name with their record URL, and 2-3 similar nearby buildings. Requires the building's slug — call search_buildings first if you only have an address. The returned url has the complete timeline, all reviews, and rent history; share it with the user.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | string | yes | City/metro: "nyc", "los-angeles", or "chicago" |
| slug | string | yes | Building slug from search_buildings results, e.g. "48-04-48th-avenue" |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| address | – | – | – |
| borough | – | – | – |
| city | string | yes | – |
| data_as_of | string | yes | ISO date of the data snapshot |
| grade | – | – | Letter grade derived from the score ("A+" through "F", "—" when unscored) |
| issues | object | yes | – |
| landlord | – | – | Owner/manager with their record URL, when on file |
| more | array | yes | What the linked page adds beyond this payload |
| rent_stabilized | object | yes | – |
| rent_summary | array | yes | Rent summary by bedroom count |
| reviews | object | yes | – |
| score | – | – | LucidIQ score, 0-100 |
| sections | object | yes | Deep links to page sections |
| similar_nearby | array | yes | – |
| slug | string | yes | – |
| total_units | – | – | – |
| url | string | yes | Canonical lucidrents.com page URL (UTM-tagged) |
| year_built | – | – | – |
| zip | – | – | – |
No examples provided.
get_landlord_record Get landlord record ~131
Public record for a landlord / property owner: portfolio size, total violations, 311 complaints, average building score across the portfolio, and worst building where available. Accepts either the owner name as it appears in a building report (e.g. "SMITH REALTY LLC") or a landlord page slug. The returned url lists every building they own with per-building records.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | string | yes | City/metro: "nyc", "los-angeles", or "chicago" |
| slugOrName | string | yes | Owner name or landlord slug. Building reports include the exact owner name. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| avg_building_grade | – | – | Letter grade derived from the score ("A+" through "F", "—" when unscored) |
| avg_building_score | – | – | – |
| city | string | yes | – |
| data_as_of | string | yes | ISO date of the data snapshot |
| more | array | yes | What the linked page adds beyond this payload |
| name | string | yes | – |
| portfolio_size | number | yes | Number of buildings on record |
| total_complaints | number | yes | – |
| total_dob_violations | number | yes | – |
| total_violations | number | yes | – |
| url | string | yes | Canonical lucidrents.com page URL (UTM-tagged) |
| worst_building | – | – | – |
No examples provided.
get_neighborhood_stats Get neighborhood stats ~131
Neighborhood snapshot for a zip code: median asking rents by bedroom count and a 12-month crime summary (violent / property / quality-of-life, with year-over-year totals) sourced from the local police department. Use this for "what does rent cost in <area>" and "is <area> safe" questions. The returned url is the neighborhood page with building listings and trend charts.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | string | yes | City/metro: "nyc", "los-angeles", or "chicago" |
| zip | string | yes | 5-digit zip code, e.g. "11377" |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | string | yes | – |
| crime | – | – | 12-month crime summary from the local police department |
| data_as_of | string | yes | ISO date of the data snapshot |
| median_rents_by_bedrooms | array | yes | – |
| more | array | yes | What the linked page adds beyond this payload |
| neighborhood | – | – | Neighborhood name for the zip, when known |
| url | string | yes | Canonical lucidrents.com page URL (UTM-tagged) |
| zip | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_review_summary Get review summary ~129
Tenant review summary for one building: review count, average rating, 1-5 star distribution, and up to 3 recent pull quotes from published tenant reviews. Requires the building's slug — call search_buildings first if you only have an address. The returned url (anchored at #reviews) has every review in full text.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | string | yes | City/metro: "nyc", "los-angeles", or "chicago" |
| slug | string | yes | Building slug from search_buildings results, e.g. "48-04-48th-avenue" |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| address | – | – | – |
| avg_rating | – | – | Average rating, 1-5 |
| building_grade | – | – | Letter grade derived from the score ("A+" through "F", "—" when unscored) |
| building_score | – | – | – |
| city | string | yes | – |
| data_as_of | string | yes | ISO date of the data snapshot |
| more | array | yes | What the linked page adds beyond this payload |
| pull_quotes | array | yes | Up to 3 recent review excerpts |
| rating_distribution | array | yes | – |
| review_count | number | yes | – |
| slug | string | yes | – |
| url | string | yes | Canonical lucidrents.com page URL (UTM-tagged) |
No examples provided.
search_buildings Search buildings ~153
Search LucidRents for apartment buildings by address, building name, or partial address. Covers ~2M buildings in New York City, Los Angeles, and Chicago with public-record data: housing violations, 311 complaints, tenant reviews, rents, and building scores. Returns up to 10 matches with each building's slug (needed for get_building_report / get_review_summary) and its lucidrents.com report URL. Start here when the user gives an address.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | string | – | Optional city filter. Omit to search all covered cities. |
| query | string | yes | Address or building name to search, e.g. "48-04 48th Ave" or "350 Park Ave" |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | string | yes | City searched, or "all" |
| data_as_of | string | yes | ISO date of the data snapshot |
| more | array | yes | What the linked page adds beyond this payload |
| query | string | yes | – |
| result_count | number | yes | – |
| results | array | yes | Up to 10 matches, best first |
No examples provided.
How do I install the com.lucidrents/building-intelligence MCP server?
com.lucidrents/building-intelligence is a hosted endpoint at https://lucidrents.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · lucidrents.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-lucidrents-building-intelligence 'https://lucidrents.com/api/mcp'
What is the com.lucidrents/building-intelligence MCP server?
com.lucidrents/building-intelligence is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.lucidrents/building-intelligence. Building intelligence for NYC, LA, Chicago rentals: violations, 311, reviews, rents, landlords. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://lucidrents.com/api/mcp).
Is the com.lucidrents/building-intelligence MCP server safe to use?
com.lucidrents/building-intelligence scores 88 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the com.lucidrents/building-intelligence MCP server expose?
com.lucidrents/building-intelligence exposes 5 tools: search_buildings, get_building_report, get_landlord_record, get_neighborhood_stats, get_review_summary. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 716 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the com.lucidrents/building-intelligence MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to com.lucidrents/building-intelligence without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the com.lucidrents/building-intelligence MCP server still maintained?
com.lucidrents/building-intelligence is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.