Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Link in Seconds

REMOTE · LINKINSECONDS.COM

Upload a file and get a shareable link. List your links and see their view stats.

+3 this week 88 Trust /100

Last scanned (1 hour ago)

Scores higher than 96% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Documents and Files

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security94
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability68
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1173 tokens (~195/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management73
  • Stability observed for 22 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 0
    • Tool “upload_file” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • “upload_file” added an optional parameter “file” cosmetic
    • “upload_file” reworded the description of “filename” cosmetic
    • “upload_file” made “filename” optional cosmetic
  • 22 Oct 26 +2
    • Authorization: fail → pass ▲ security
    • First check of Authorization: partial security
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “create_upload_url” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “get_link_analytics” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “upload_file” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: 134 → 185 ▼ functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://linkinseconds.com/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=linkinseconds.com CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 29 Oct 2026 27 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 5201225b89a35e28aed27d66708ea90eedd
SANs: linkinseconds.com
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of linkinseconds.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
linkinseconds.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Enforced and verified

The endpoint asked for a token and published valid RFC 9728 metadata describing how to get one.

Result Enforced and verified
Enforced On tool calls
HTTP status 200

WWW-Authenticate challenge Bearer resource_metadata="https://linkinseconds.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource"

Bearer resource_metadata="https://linkinseconds.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource"
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options SAMEORIGIN
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(self), geolocation=(), browsing-topics=()

Protected resource metadata

Document https://linkinseconds.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource
Retrieved Yes
Resource https://linkinseconds.com/api/mcp
Authorisation server https://linkinseconds.com

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://linkinseconds.com/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://linkinseconds.com/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://linkinseconds.com/api/mcp
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~984 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
create_upload_url ~187

For files too big to send inline: returns a short-lived upload URL (valid 10 minutes). PUT the raw file bytes to it with the given Content-Type header (for example with curl), then call finish_upload with the returned path. Per-file limit: 250 MB on the Free plan, 500 MB on Pro and Lifetime. A bigger file is refused, so tell the user it is over the limit instead of asking for it. Programs and scripts (.exe, .msi, .dmg, .apk, .app, .bat, .sh, .jar, .dll and similar) are always blocked: say so and do not try to upload them.

NameTypeReqDescription
content_typestring–MIME type. Optional: guessed from the extension.
filenamestringyesFile name with extension.
size_bytesintegeryesExact file size in bytes.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

finish_upload ~132

Call after PUTting the file to the URL from create_upload_url. Checks and scans the file, then returns its public link.

NameTypeReqDescription
content_typestring–The same content type used for the PUT. Optional.
filenamestringyesThe same file name passed to create_upload_url.
pathstringyesThe path returned by create_upload_url.
slugstring–Optional custom link name, the last part of the link address (letters, numbers and dashes). It must be free; reserved words are refused.
titlestring–Optional link title shown on the page.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_account_analytics ~79

Read-only. The whole account's analytics over a UTC window: views, unique visitors, time on files, countries, devices, traffic sources, busiest hour and the top links.

NameTypeReqDescription
rangestring–Time window, UTC days: 7d, 14d, 30d (default), 90d or all.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_link_analytics ~151

Read-only. Use this when the user asks whether someone opened a link, or how it did. How one of the account's links performed: views, unique visitors, time on the file, how far readers got (pages for PDFs, watch-through for video and audio, scroll depth for pages), countries, devices, traffic sources and the busiest hour, over a UTC window. Pass the slug or the full link URL.

NameTypeReqDescription
rangestring–Time window, UTC days: 7d, 14d, 30d (default), 90d or all.
slugstringyesThe link's slug (the last part of its address), or its full URL.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_links ~42

List the links on this Link in Seconds account, newest first, with their URLs and status.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger–How many to return (default 20).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

upload_file ~393

Use this when the user wants to share a file, document, image or HTML page as a link. Publish a file and get a public Link in Seconds URL that opens in any browser (no sign-in for the viewer). If the user attached a file in the chat, pass it in `file` (any size the plan allows). Otherwise pass the file as text in `content` (HTML, Markdown, CSV, SVG, JSON...) or as base64 in `content_base64` (PDF, images, ZIP...), up to 3 MB; for bigger files use create_upload_url. The account's plan limits apply. Per-file limit: 250 MB on the Free plan, 500 MB on Pro and Lifetime. A bigger file is refused, so tell the user it is over the limit instead of asking for it. Programs and scripts (.exe, .msi, .dmg, .apk, .app, .bat, .sh, .jar, .dll and similar) are always blocked: say so and do not try to upload them.

NameTypeReqDescription
contentstring–The file content as UTF-8 text. Use this OR content_base64.
content_base64string–The file content, base64-encoded. Use this OR content.
content_typestring–MIME type. Optional: guessed from the extension.
fileobject–A file the user attached in ChatGPT. ChatGPT fills this in; do not invent it.
filenamestring–File name with extension, e.g. report.pdf or index.html. Optional with `file` (its own name is used).
slugstring–Optional custom link name, the last part of the link address (letters, numbers and dashes). It must be free; reserved words are refused.
titlestring–Optional link title shown on the page.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Link in Seconds MCP server?

Link in Seconds is a hosted endpoint at https://linkinseconds.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · linkinseconds.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-linkinseconds-mcp 'https://linkinseconds.com/api/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Link in Seconds MCP server?

Link in Seconds is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.linkinseconds/mcp. Upload a file and get a shareable link. List your links and see their view stats. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://linkinseconds.com/api/mcp).

Is the Link in Seconds MCP server safe to use?

Link in Seconds scores 88 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Link in Seconds MCP server expose?

Link in Seconds exposes 6 tools: upload_file, create_upload_url, finish_upload, list_links, get_link_analytics, get_account_analytics. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 984 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Link in Seconds MCP server require authentication?

Yes. Link in Seconds asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.

Is the Link in Seconds MCP server still maintained?

Link in Seconds is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.