The Landing Company of Madison Park
REMOTE · LANDINGONMADISON.COM
Seattle engineering consultancy: services, guides, FAQs, and requests for a free 30-minute call.
Available components
Last scanned (10 hours ago)
Scores higher than 61% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 6 Nov 2026.
Category Developer Tools
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability68
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 416 tokens (~59/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management13
- Stability observed for 4 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage95
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 86% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 6 Nov 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 0
- Tool “request_consultation” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- Tool “request_consultation” changed its title: Request a free 30-minute call → Request a call cosmetic
- 2 Nov 26 72
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 6 Nov 2026 · Probed https://landingonmadison.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=landingonmadison.com | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 20 Oct 2026 | 18 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 544297f3425b8944e9c3f56d549780c03ed |
| SANs: landingonmadison.com | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of landingonmadison.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | DS published | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| landingonmadison.com. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://landingonmadison.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://landingonmadison.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://landingonmadison.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_approach How the firm works ~25
How an engagement runs, from understanding the problem to handing the work back.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_faq Frequently asked questions ~28
Answers to common questions, including whether an independent consultant or a larger firm is the better fit.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_firm_overview About the firm ~39
What The Landing Company of Madison Park is, who it helps, who does the work, where it is based, and how to start.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_guide Read a guide ~30
The full text of one guide, by slug from list_guides.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_guides Guides ~32
Short practical guides the firm has written on difficult technology decisions. Returns each guide’s slug and the question it answers.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_services Services ~56
The services the firm offers, each with the situations it fits and what the work involves. Optionally limit to services for companies and engineering teams, or for local small businesses.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| audience | string | – | Omit to list every service. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
request_consultation Request a call ~154
Sends The Landing Company a request for a 30-minute call with Campion Fellin, with the person’s name, email, problem description, and optionally company and availability. It does not book a time: the reply comes by email within one business day.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| availability | string | – | Days, times and time zone that suit them, if they said. |
| company | string | – | Their company or organization, if they gave one. |
| string | yes | Where to send the reply. | |
| name | string | yes | The person’s name. |
| problem | string | yes | A few sentences in the person’s words: what has been difficult, what they have tried, and what a good outcome looks like. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the The Landing Company of Madison Park MCP server?
The Landing Company of Madison Park is a hosted endpoint at https://landingonmadison.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · landingonmadison.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-landingonmadison-landing-company 'https://landingonmadison.com/mcp'
What is the The Landing Company of Madison Park MCP server?
The Landing Company of Madison Park is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.landingonmadison/landing-company. Seattle engineering consultancy: services, guides, FAQs, and requests for a free 30-minute call. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://landingonmadison.com/mcp).
Is the The Landing Company of Madison Park MCP server safe to use?
The Landing Company of Madison Park scores 74 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the The Landing Company of Madison Park MCP server expose?
The Landing Company of Madison Park exposes 7 tools: get_firm_overview, list_services, get_approach, get_faq, list_guides, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 364 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the The Landing Company of Madison Park MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to The Landing Company of Madison Park without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the The Landing Company of Madison Park MCP server still maintained?
The Landing Company of Madison Park is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 6 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the The Landing Company of Madison Park MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on The Landing Company of Madison Park, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.