Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Koreanics: Korea law, Acts and bills in English

REMOTE · KOREANICS.COM

Korean Assembly bills tracked hourly in English, plus Korean Acts and decrees article by article.

Available components

+4 this week 81 Trust /100

Last scanned (23 hours ago)

Scores higher than 86% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 23 Oct 2026.

Category Education and Research

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 968 tokens (~138/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management63
  • Stability observed for 19 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 17 Oct 26 +1
    • Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • MCP protocol: unverified → fail ▼ functional
    • Endpoint reachability: unreachable → reachable ▲ functional
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.43 ▲ functional
  • 16 Oct 26 0
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → unreachable ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.37 → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Authorization: partial → unverified ▼ security
    • Capabilities: fail → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
  • 15 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Oct 26 +1
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
  • 10 Oct 26 +3
    • Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.20 ▲ functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 23 Oct 2026 · Probed https://koreanics.com/wp-json/koreanics/v1/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=koreanics.com CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 8 Oct 2026 6 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 59b356902652fddac739fc63cd9645592f0
SANs: *.koreanics.com, koreanics.com
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of koreanics.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
koreanics.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options SAMEORIGIN
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://koreanics.com/wp-json/koreanics/v1/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://koreanics.com/wp-json/koreanics/v1/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://koreanics.com/wp-json/koreanics/v1/mcp
MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~859 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_bill ~98

Facts about one National Assembly bill by its bill number: English title, current stage and date, filing date, effective dates when promulgated, a one-line summary of what the bill proposed as filed, and links. committee_alternative = a replacement bill drafted by a committee, whose filing date can be later than its committee or judiciary dates.

NameTypeReqDescription
bill_nostringyesSeven-digit National Assembly bill number, e.g. "2216797".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_law_article ~109

Full English text of one article of a South Korean statute or enforcement decree (the law may be given by slug or by name), with a one-line plain-English explanation where available, the version date and the official Korean source link.

NameTypeReqDescription
articlestringyesArticle number, e.g. "56" or "2-3" (Article 2-3).
lawstringyesLaw slug, e.g. "labor-standards-act" (see list_laws).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_law_overview ~134

The shape of one South Korean statute or enforcement decree without its full text: official English name, version in force, how much is translated into English, its chapters and sections with the article ranges they cover, the linked enforcement decree or parent Act, and how many amendment bills are pending in the National Assembly (a count and a link, not what each bill changes). Works for laws whose English translation is still in progress. Use get_law_article for the text.

NameTypeReqDescription
lawstringyesLaw slug, e.g. "labor-standards-act" (see list_laws or search_law_articles).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

latest_briefs ~70

The most recent Koreanics Bill Briefs (analysis of one bill for foreign companies) or Weekly Briefs, with title, date, summary line and URL.

NameTypeReqDescription
kindstring–"bill" (default) or "weekly".
limitinteger–Maximum results (default 10).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_laws ~118

The South Korean statutes and enforcement decrees available in English, with slug, subject area, version in force and how many articles are translated. Paged: 50 per call by default; pass next_offset to continue, or filter by area.

NameTypeReqDescription
areastring–Optional subject area to filter by, as shown in the results (e.g. "Employment & Labor").
limitinteger–Laws per page (default 50).
offsetinteger–Start position for paging (use next_offset from the previous result).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_bills ~107

Keyword search over bills that Koreanics tracks (English titles and one-line summaries). Returns stage, dates, topic tags and URL.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger–Maximum results (default 10).
querystringyesKeywords in English, e.g. "customs" or "personal information".
stagestring–Optional stage to filter by, e.g. "In committee", "Passed committee", "Passed plenary", "Promulgated", "In force".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_law_articles ~223

Keyword search over the English text of South Korean statutes and enforcement decrees in the Koreanics law database. Each Act and its Enforcement Decree are separate laws with their own slugs (e.g. labor-standards-act and enforcement-decree-of-the-labor-standards-act; also personal-information-protection-act, foreign-investment-promotion-act, foreign-exchange-transactions-act, monopoly-regulation-and-fair-trade-act, commercial-act, customs-act, value-added-tax-act, immigration-act, patent-act, copyright-act). Periods, amounts and thresholds are often in the Decree, so search it too; a law may also be given by name. Returns matching articles with a short snippet and URL. Use get_law_article for the full text.

NameTypeReqDescription
lawstring–Optional law slug from list_laws, to search one law only.
limitinteger–Maximum results (default 10).
querystringyesKeywords in English, e.g. "overtime pay" or "foreign investment notification".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Koreanics: Korea law, Acts and bills in English MCP server?

Koreanics: Korea law, Acts and bills in English is a hosted endpoint at https://koreanics.com/wp-json/koreanics/v1/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · koreanics.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-koreanics-korea-law-acts-and-bills 'https://koreanics.com/wp-json/koreanics/v1/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Koreanics: Korea law, Acts and bills in English MCP server?

Koreanics: Korea law, Acts and bills in English is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.koreanics/korea-law-acts-and-bills. Korean Assembly bills tracked hourly in English, plus Korean Acts and decrees article by article. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://koreanics.com/wp-json/koreanics/v1/mcp).

Is the Koreanics: Korea law, Acts and bills in English MCP server safe to use?

Koreanics: Korea law, Acts and bills in English scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Koreanics: Korea law, Acts and bills in English MCP server expose?

Koreanics: Korea law, Acts and bills in English exposes 7 tools: search_law_articles, get_law_article, get_law_overview, list_laws, search_bills, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 859 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Koreanics: Korea law, Acts and bills in English MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Koreanics: Korea law, Acts and bills in English without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Koreanics: Korea law, Acts and bills in English MCP server still maintained?

Koreanics: Korea law, Acts and bills in English is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 23 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.