InfoSec Job Board
REMOTE · WWW.INFOSECJOBBOARD.COM · SCANNED SEP 23
Search 10k+ live cybersecurity jobs from 246 security companies, plus salary benchmarks and stats.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 5 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability77
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 397 tokens (~79/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities40
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-03-26; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the InfoSec Job Board MCP server?
InfoSec Job Board is a hosted endpoint at https://www.infosecjobboard.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.infosecjobboard.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-infosecjobboard-jobs 'https://www.infosecjobboard.com/api/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-infosecjobboard-jobs": {
"url": "https://www.infosecjobboard.com/api/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"com-infosecjobboard-jobs": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://www.infosecjobboard.com/api/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.com-infosecjobboard-jobs] url = "https://www.infosecjobboard.com/api/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"com-infosecjobboard-jobs": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://www.infosecjobboard.com/api/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add com-infosecjobboard-jobs --url 'https://www.infosecjobboard.com/api/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
com-infosecjobboard-jobs:
url: "https://www.infosecjobboard.com/api/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"com-infosecjobboard-jobs": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://www.infosecjobboard.com/api/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add com-infosecjobboard-jobs -t streamable-http -u 'https://www.infosecjobboard.com/api/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-infosecjobboard-jobs": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://www.infosecjobboard.com/api/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 29 Aug 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 27 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Aug 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 31 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 30 Jul 26 0
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 23 Sept 2026 · Probed https://www.infosecjobboard.com/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=www.infosecjobboard.com | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 27 Jul 2026 | 25 Oct 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 5f6925deb40cb9b7bcac71916a8b7e7ec61 |
| SANs: www.infosecjobboard.com | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of www.infosecjobboard.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| infosecjobboard.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.infosecjobboard.com/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.infosecjobboard.com/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://www.infosecjobboard.com/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_job ~49
Get one job by id: role details, a short description excerpt, and the canonical job-page URL (which is also where to apply).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | Job id from search_jobs results |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
market_stats ~41
Live aggregate cybersecurity hiring stats: total open security roles, new this week, remote share, salary-disclosure rate, and top specializations / seniorities / countries.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
salary_benchmark ~71
Curated cybersecurity salary benchmark bands (USD + local currency) across 21 countries including the US, EU, Gulf (tax-free), India, LatAm, and Africa.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| country | string | – | Optional country name; omit for all 21 countries |
| role | string | yes | Role to benchmark |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_jobs ~138
Search live cybersecurity jobs from 200+ security companies (updated hourly). Returns up to 10 matching roles plus the total match count and a browse URL for the full list. All Apply flows go through the returned job URLs.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| country | string | – | Country name, e.g. "Germany" or "United States" |
| limit | integer | – | Max results (default 5, hard cap 10) |
| query | string | – | Free-text search over title / company / location |
| remote | boolean | – | Only remote roles |
| seniority | string | – | Seniority bucket |
| specialization | string | – | Cybersecurity specialization |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
top_employers ~54
The security companies with the most open cybersecurity roles right now (objective open-roles ranking with remote share and pay-transparency rate).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | Max results (default 5, hard cap 10) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the InfoSec Job Board MCP server?
InfoSec Job Board is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.infosecjobboard/jobs. Search 10k+ live cybersecurity jobs from 246 security companies, plus salary benchmarks and stats. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.infosecjobboard.com/api/mcp).
Is the InfoSec Job Board MCP server safe to use?
InfoSec Job Board scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the InfoSec Job Board MCP server expose?
InfoSec Job Board exposes 5 tools: search_jobs, get_job, salary_benchmark, market_stats, top_employers. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 353 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the InfoSec Job Board MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to InfoSec Job Board without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the InfoSec Job Board MCP server still maintained?
InfoSec Job Board is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 23 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.