Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Hilo Studio

REMOTE · HILOSTUDIOLAB.COM

Madrid studio for branding and interactive 3D web: services, prices, work, Lab demos, quotes.

+3 this week 84 Trust /100

Last scanned (9 hours ago)

Scores higher than 89% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Design and Media

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
  • The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
  • No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
  • HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
  • The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
  • DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1687 tokens (~129/item across 13 items; 13 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management80
  • Stability observed for 24 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 14 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (13)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1
    • Tool “hilo_find_relevant_work” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “hilo_list_blog_posts” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • “hilo_get_case_study” reworded the description of “slug” cosmetic
    • “hilo_get_service” reworded the description of “slug” cosmetic
  • 20 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
    • Server version: 1.0.0 → 1.1.0 functional
    • New tool “hilo_recommend” functional
    • “hilo_request_quote” added an optional parameter “lang” cosmetic
    • “hilo_request_quote” added an optional parameter “objective” cosmetic
    • “hilo_request_quote” added an optional parameter “price_fit” cosmetic
    • “hilo_request_quote” added an optional parameter “situation” cosmetic
    • “hilo_request_quote” added an optional parameter “timing” cosmetic
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://hilostudiolab.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=hilostudiolab.com CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 16 Oct 2026 14 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 51dd3a6801fc5deb5be4b44152ccc2ff35d
SANs: hilostudiolab.com
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of hilostudiolab.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. DS published 19718 13 Verified
hilostudiolab.com. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://hilostudiolab.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://hilostudiolab.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://hilostudiolab.com/mcp
MCP tools · 13 exposed · ~1,439 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
hilo_find_relevant_work ~119

Given a description of what the user needs (e.g. 'a 3D configurator for furniture', 'a live 3D map for a winery', 'interactive training for engineers'), returns the most relevant Hilo Studio services, case studies, Lab experiments and articles, with URLs.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer: 'en' (English) or 'es' (Spanish). Use the user's language.
needstringyesWhat the user wants to build or solve, in their own words.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

hilo_get_blog_post ~65

Full text of one blog article, with its FAQ.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer: 'en' (English) or 'es' (Spanish). Use the user's language.
slugstringyesPost slug, from hilo_list_blog_posts.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

hilo_get_case_study ~104

Full case study of one project: the challenge, the idea, how it was built (stack, 3D models) and key facts.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer: 'en' (English) or 'es' (Spanish). Use the user's language.
slugstringyesProject slug, from hilo_list_projects. One of: tabasco, padel, motor, domingueros, bar, abbey

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

hilo_get_lab_experiment ~79

Full write-up of one Lab experiment: what it is, how to use the demo and what it explores.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer: 'en' (English) or 'es' (Spanish). Use the user's language.
slugstringyesExperiment slug, from hilo_list_lab_experiments.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

hilo_get_pricing ~69

Hilo Studio's packages with starting prices (EUR, VAT not included), what each includes and typical timeline, plus the starting price for custom work.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer: 'en' (English) or 'es' (Spanish). Use the user's language.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

hilo_get_service ~94

Full detail of one service: what it is, how it is done, price, related case studies and FAQ.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer: 'en' (English) or 'es' (Spanish). Use the user's language.
slugstringyesService slug, from hilo_list_services. One of: 3d-web-design, 3d-configurator, conversion-ux

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

hilo_list_blog_posts ~66

Articles from Hilo Studio's blog (3D web costs, WebGL, configurators, AR, interactive training…), newest first.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer: 'en' (English) or 'es' (Spanish). Use the user's language.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

hilo_list_lab_experiments ~77

Hilo Studio's Lab: experiments the studio builds to push interactive 3D (WebGL, shaders, AR, interactive courses…), each with a live demo you can open.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer: 'en' (English) or 'es' (Spanish). Use the user's language.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

hilo_list_projects ~61

Portfolio of Hilo Studio: each project with sector, type, services involved, live URL and case-study URL.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer: 'en' (English) or 'es' (Spanish). Use the user's language.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

hilo_list_services ~66

All services Hilo Studio offers, with a short summary, starting price and URL. Use hilo_get_service for the full detail of one.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer: 'en' (English) or 'es' (Spanish). Use the user's language.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

hilo_recommend ~238

Hilo Studio's guided contact, in the chat: the same three one-tap questions the website asks (goal, what's holding them back, timing). Call it with whatever the user has answered so far (all optional). It returns the next question with its options or, once all are answered, what fits, its starting price, when they'd have it and a related case. Ask ONE question at a time with its options, in the user's language; never answer for the user. Then you may ask whether the price fits (price_fit). No personal data needed.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer: 'en' (English) or 'es' (Spanish). Use the user's language.
objectivestring–What the user wants to achieve (question 1).
price_fitstring–Optional: after seeing the recommended price, whether it fits what they had in mind.
situationstring–What's holding them back today (question 2; the valid options depend on the objective, hilo_recommend lists them).
timingstring–When they need it (question 3).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

hilo_request_quote ~327

Sends a project enquiry to Hilo Studio on behalf of the user (it reaches the team by email; they reply within 24 h and the user gets a confirmation email). ONLY call this after the user has explicitly confirmed they want to contact the studio and has given their name and email. Never invent contact details.

NameTypeReqDescription
budgetstring–Budget range, if the user mentioned one.
companystring–Company or brand, if given.
deadlinestring–Desired timing or deadline, if mentioned.
emailstringyesThe user's email, where the studio will reply.
intereststring–Package of interest if the user picked one (from hilo_get_pricing), 'custom' for bespoke work, or 'unsure'.
langstring–Language of the user: the confirmation email goes out in it.
namestringyesThe user's name.
objectivestring–What the user wants to achieve (question 1).
price_fitstring–Optional: after seeing the recommended price, whether it fits what they had in mind.
projectstringyesWhat they need: goals, context, what it's for. Use the user's own words.
situationstring–What's holding them back today (question 2; the valid options depend on the objective, hilo_recommend lists them).
timingstring–When they need it (question 3).
user_confirmedbooleanyesMust be true: the user explicitly agreed to send these details to Hilo Studio.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

hilo_studio_overview ~74

Who Hilo Studio is: what it does, where it is, languages, how it works, awards and how to contact it. Call this first for general questions.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer: 'en' (English) or 'es' (Spanish). Use the user's language.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Hilo Studio MCP server?

Hilo Studio is a hosted endpoint at https://hilostudiolab.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · hilostudiolab.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-hilostudiolab-studio 'https://hilostudiolab.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Hilo Studio MCP server?

Hilo Studio is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.hilostudiolab/studio. Madrid studio for branding and interactive 3D web: services, prices, work, Lab demos, quotes. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://hilostudiolab.com/mcp).

Is the Hilo Studio MCP server safe to use?

Hilo Studio scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Hilo Studio MCP server expose?

Hilo Studio exposes 13 tools: hilo_studio_overview, hilo_list_services, hilo_get_service, hilo_get_pricing, hilo_list_projects, and 8 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,439 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Hilo Studio MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Hilo Studio without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Hilo Studio MCP server still maintained?

Hilo Studio is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Hilo Studio MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Hilo Studio, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.