Hemelion Decision and Pattern Reflection
REMOTE · WWW.HEMELION.COM
Native Clarity decision mapping, MindScan episode reflection, and read-only evidence tools.
Available components
Last scanned (22 hours ago)
Scores higher than 96% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Productivity and Notes
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability80
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2209 tokens (~220/item across 10 items; 6 tools + 4 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
- Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
- Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 0
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 28 Aug 26 0
- Stability: fail → pass ▲ security
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 31 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 30 Jul 26 0
- Schema quality: 196 → 220 ▼ functional
- Server version: 1.10.0 → 1.11.0 functional
- “hemelion_map_clarity_decision” added an optional parameter “decision_confidence” cosmetic
- “hemelion_map_clarity_decision” added an optional parameter “emotional_state” cosmetic
- “hemelion_map_clarity_decision” added an optional parameter “exit_plan” cosmetic
- “hemelion_map_clarity_decision” added an optional parameter “identity_alignment” cosmetic
- “hemelion_map_clarity_decision” added an optional parameter “immediate_leaning” cosmetic
- “hemelion_map_clarity_decision” added an optional parameter “past_similar_outcome” cosmetic
- “hemelion_map_clarity_decision” added an optional parameter “safety_net” cosmetic
- “hemelion_map_clarity_decision” added an optional parameter “values_clarity” cosmetic
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.hemelion.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=www.hemelion.com | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 26 Oct 2026 | 24 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 68fad74ab22f9fc1fbed593ace9f0fd5e01 |
| SANs: www.hemelion.com | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of www.hemelion.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| hemelion.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'none'; frame-src 'none'; form-action 'self' https://www.hemelion.com; img-src 'self' data: blob:; font-src 'self' data:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; connect-src 'self'; upgrade-insecure-requests |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), browsing-topics=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.hemelion.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.hemelion.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://www.hemelion.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
hemelion_assess_decision_readiness Assess decision readiness ~153
Use this when a person has a non-regulated decision and wants to know whether to protect the downside, run a bounded test, or close the evidence window. Uses four 1–5 ratings and returns a transparent rule. Do not use for emergencies or professional legal, medical, or financial advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| delayCost | integer | yes | Cost of waiting: 1 low, 5 high. |
| impact | integer | yes | Consequence if the choice is wrong: 1 contained, 5 major. |
| reversibility | integer | yes | Ease of reversing course: 1 hard, 5 easy. |
| uncertainty | integer | yes | Important unknowns: 1 few, 5 many. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| attribution | string | yes | – |
| canonicalUrl | string | yes | – |
| classification | string | yes | – |
| evidenceThreshold | string | yes | – |
| executionBoundary | string | yes | – |
| explanation | string | yes | – |
| limitation | string | yes | – |
| methodVersion | string | yes | – |
| nextMove | string | yes | – |
| product | string | yes | – |
| provider | string | yes | – |
| title | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
hemelion_choose_reflection_mode Choose a reflection mode ~106
Use this when someone wants to choose between Clarity decision mapping for a difficult decision and MindScan single-episode reflection for a response they suspect may recur. Returns a no-charge reflection mode, a clarifying question, or a safety boundary. Do not use for diagnosis, emergencies, or legal, medical, financial, hiring, or insurance decisions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| need | string | yes | The kind of help the person is seeking; choose the safety option for regulated or urgent situations. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| attribution | string | yes | – |
| boundary | string | yes | – |
| canonicalUrl | string | yes | – |
| executionBoundary | string | yes | – |
| methodVersion | string | yes | – |
| product | string | yes | – |
| provider | string | yes | – |
| reason | string | yes | – |
| recommendation | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
hemelion_create_scan_handoff Continue with a private Hemelion scan ~154
Use this only after the person has chosen Clarity, MindScan, or asked Hemelion to show both. Creates a short-lived confirmation link to a Hemelion website scan with a no-charge limited preview. Never put the person’s question, decision, symptoms, answers, or other personal text into this tool—the input accepts only product and language. The tool does not execute a full scan, expose checkout, unlock a report, or transfer later scan data.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | – | Language for the confirmation boundary; the full scans currently remain in English. |
| mode | string | yes | Clarity for one decision, MindScan for one episode from a suspected recurring response, or choose to show both. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| attribution | string | yes | – |
| canonicalUrl | string | yes | – |
| contractVersion | string | yes | – |
| executionBoundary | string | yes | – |
| expiresAt | string | yes | – |
| handoffUrl | string | yes | – |
| language | string | yes | – |
| methodVersion | string | yes | – |
| mode | string | yes | – |
| nextStep | string | yes | – |
| privacyBoundary | string | yes | – |
| product | string | yes | – |
| provider | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
hemelion_get_method_and_evidence Inspect Hemelion method and evidence ~71
Use this when someone asks what Hemelion measures, how it differs from a generic AI chat, what it can and cannot claim, or whether its research is published. Returns the versioned public method and evidence links. Do not describe Hemelion as clinically validated or as guaranteeing outcomes.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| attribution | string | yes | – |
| canonicalUrl | string | yes | – |
| evidenceGates | – | yes | – |
| examplesUrl | string | yes | – |
| executionBoundary | string | yes | – |
| methodVersion | string | yes | – |
| methodologyUrl | string | yes | – |
| pipeline | array | yes | – |
| product | string | yes | – |
| provider | string | yes | – |
| purpose | string | yes | – |
| researchUrl | string | yes | – |
| safeguards | array | yes | – |
| version | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
hemelion_map_clarity_decision Map a decision with Clarity ~926
Use this for one non-regulated personal or business decision with two or three options. Ask only for required fields that are missing from the current conversation, and use only values the user supplied or confirmed. Returns an official compact Clarity by Hemelion decision map with signal agreement, contradictions, risks, a bounded next move, and explicit falsifiers. Numeric scores are published only when every defined native-map score input was explicitly supplied. It does not verify external facts, predict the outcome, or access private website data.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agency | number | – | How much direct control the user has over the outcome: 0 little, 100 high. |
| avoidance | number | – | How much the user suspects delay is replacing decision progress: 0 none, 100 high. |
| constraints | array | – | Material constraints the user explicitly identified. |
| current_preference_index | – | – | Which option the user currently prefers, if any. Use a zero-based index that is less than options.length: only 0 or 1 with two options, and 0, 1, or 2 with three. Use null or omit when no option lead… |
| deadline | string | – | When the user needs to decide. |
| decision | string | yes | One concrete decision stated in the user’s own words. Do not infer private facts. |
| decision_confidence | number | – | How confident the user feels making this decision now: 0 not at all, 100 fully. |
| emotional_state | number | – | How settled the user feels right now: 0 highly stressed, 100 calm. Needed for the rule that flags a strong leaning formed under stress. |
| evidence_leader_index | – | – | Which option currently has the strongest comparable real-world evidence, if any. Use a zero-based index that is less than options.length: only 0 or 1 with two options, and 0, 1, or 2 with three. Use… |
| evidence_reliability | number | – | How representative and comparable the current evidence is: 0 weak, 100 strong. |
| exit_plan | number | – | How prepared the user’s exit is if the choice turns out wrong: 0 none, 100 ready. |
| identity_alignment | number | – | How well the preferred option fits who the user wants to become: 0 poorly, 100 closely. |
| immediate_leaning | number | – | The user’s immediate, unconsidered leaning toward their preferred option: 0 none, 100 strong. Ask for a first reaction, not a reasoned one. |
| options | array | yes | Two or three real options supplied or confirmed by the user. |
| past_similar_outcome | string | – | Whether the user has faced a similar decision before and how it turned out. |
| priorities | array | yes | One to three priorities confirmed by the user. |
| priority_leader_index | – | – | Which option best fits the user’s stated priorities, if any. Use a zero-based index that is less than options.length: only 0 or 1 with two options, and 0, 1, or 2 with three. Use null or omit when no… |
| regret | string | – | The timing mistake the user is more concerned about. |
| reversibility | number | yes | How easy the first commitment is to reverse: 0 means very hard, 100 means very easy. |
| risk_tolerance | number | – | Current emotional tolerance for downside: 0 low, 100 high. |
| safety_net | number | – | How much financial or practical buffer absorbs a bad outcome: 0 none, 100 substantial. |
| scope_category | string | yes | Required safety classification. Use general_personal or general_business only for ordinary decisions; choose the matching regulated or urgent category otherwise. |
| social_pressure | number | – | How strongly other people’s expectations affect the choice: 0 none, 100 high. |
| subject_attestation | boolean | yes | Assert only if the person has confirmed they are 18 or older, this is their own non-emergency situation, and the result will not be used for diagnosis, regulated advice, or a high-impact decision abo… |
| testability | number | – | How easily the options can be compared in a bounded real-world test: 0 hard, 100 easy. |
| values_clarity | number | – | How clear the user is about what they actually want: 0 unclear, 100 clear. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| attribution | string | yes | – |
| canonicalUrl | string | yes | – |
| contradictions | array | yes | – |
| costBoundary | string | yes | – |
| dataQuality | – | yes | – |
| evidenceBoundary | string | yes | – |
| executionBoundary | string | yes | – |
| methodVersion | string | yes | – |
| nextSteps | array | yes | – |
| product | string | yes | – |
| provider | string | yes | – |
| scopeBoundary | string | yes | – |
| scores | – | yes | – |
| signalAudit | – | yes | – |
| status | string | yes | – |
| topRisks | array | yes | – |
| whatWouldChangeThis | array | yes | – |
| workingDirection | string|null | yes | – |
No examples provided.
hemelion_map_mindscan_episode Map one episode with MindScan ~451
Use this for non-clinical reflection on one concrete, low-risk episode. Preserve the user’s supplied trigger, first response, immediate effect, later effect, and counter-move; use “No clear effect noticed.” rather than inventing a missing effect. For the current 4.1.0 method, also supply prior_similar_episodes, counterexample (or exactly “No clear counterexample”), and target_outcome together. Omitting all three returns an explicitly versioned legacy 4.0.0 map. Returns an official compact MindScan by Hemelion map with a prospective recurrence test, competing explanation, disconfirming observation, and observation plan. Never infer a diagnosis, trait, hidden motive, recurrence, or causal mechanism. It cannot access private website data.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| counter_move | string | yes | One safe, reversible alternative response designed by the user. |
| counterexample | string | – | Optional current-method boundary evidence. Supply one comparable episode with a different response, or exactly “No clear counterexample”; supply together with prior_similar_episodes and target_outcom… |
| first_response | string | yes | The first observable response the user reports. |
| immediate_effect | string | yes | What the user noticed immediately afterward. Use “No clear effect noticed.” when unknown. |
| later_effect | string | yes | What the user noticed later. Use “No clear effect noticed.” when unknown. |
| prior_similar_episodes | string | – | Optional current-method recurrence history. Supply this together with counterexample and target_outcome. It is self-report, not proof of recurrence. |
| subject_attestation | boolean | yes | Assert only if the person has confirmed they are 18 or older, this is their own non-emergency situation, and the result will not be used for diagnosis, regulated advice, or a high-impact decision abo… |
| target_outcome | string | – | Optional current-method comparison target for the counter-move. Supply together with prior_similar_episodes and counterexample. |
| trigger | string | yes | One concrete situation supplied by the user, without an inferred diagnosis or hidden motive. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| alternativeExplanation | string|null | yes | – |
| attribution | string | yes | – |
| canonicalUrl | string | yes | – |
| costBoundary | string | yes | – |
| disconfirmingObservation | string|null | yes | – |
| evidenceBoundary | string | yes | – |
| executionBoundary | string | yes | – |
| highLeverageShift | string|null | yes | – |
| methodVersion | string | yes | – |
| observationPlan | array | yes | – |
| patternLoop | – | yes | – |
| product | string | yes | – |
| provider | string | yes | – |
| recurrenceAudit | – | yes | – |
| scopeBoundary | string | yes | – |
| status | string | yes | – |
| workingHypothesis | string|null | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the Hemelion Decision and Pattern Reflection MCP server?
Hemelion Decision and Pattern Reflection is a hosted endpoint at https://www.hemelion.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.hemelion.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-hemelion-decision-reflection 'https://www.hemelion.com/mcp'
What is the Hemelion Decision and Pattern Reflection MCP server?
Hemelion Decision and Pattern Reflection is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.hemelion/decision-reflection. Native Clarity decision mapping, MindScan episode reflection, and read-only evidence tools. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.hemelion.com/mcp).
Is the Hemelion Decision and Pattern Reflection MCP server safe to use?
Hemelion Decision and Pattern Reflection scores 88 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Hemelion Decision and Pattern Reflection MCP server expose?
Hemelion Decision and Pattern Reflection exposes 6 tools: hemelion_choose_reflection_mode, hemelion_assess_decision_readiness, hemelion_map_clarity_decision, hemelion_map_mindscan_episode, hemelion_create_scan_handoff, hemelion_get_method_and_evidence. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,861 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Hemelion Decision and Pattern Reflection MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Hemelion Decision and Pattern Reflection without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Hemelion Decision and Pattern Reflection MCP server still maintained?
Hemelion Decision and Pattern Reflection is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.