GroundedKit Marketing Stats Checker
REMOTE · GROUNDEDKIT.COM
Check marketing and influencer stats against primary sources: verdict, source, safe wording.
Available components
Last scanned (12 hours ago)
Scores higher than 10% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 6 Nov 2026.
Category Marketing and SEO
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not yet verified: we couldn't confirm whether this endpoint requires it. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability0
- Transport check failed: declared streamable-http, but the endpoint returned HTTP 405. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.Unverified
Unverified: 5 categories
Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.
Checks we ran (5)
- TLS certificate
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
Checks we could not complete (6)
These are gaps on our side, not findings about this hosted endpoint. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.
- Authorization in Endpoint SecurityAuthorisation not yet verified: we couldn't confirm whether this endpoint requires it.
- Schema quality in Schema Quality & AI Usability (scores 0 for this)Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.
- Stability in Stability & Change Management (scores 0 for this)Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).
- Tool coverage in Tool Coverage (scores 0 for this)Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.
- Tool safety in Tool Safety (scores 0 for this)Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.
- Capabilities in Capabilities (scores 0 for this)Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Where what the registry lists and what we observed about the package disagree. This is read from the stored diagnostics and is never an input to the score.
Endpoint address
- Registry says
https://groundedkit.com/mcp- Package shows
https://groundedkit.com/login
The registry's URL redirects here, so the authorisation and transport results describe this address rather than the one listed. See the evidence →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 6 Nov 26 −54
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 6 Nov 2026 · Probed https://groundedkit.com/login · Declared URL https://groundedkit.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=groundedkit.com | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 5 Nov 2026 | 3 Feb 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 62ee0dc7d8fa0ac219464e61dbf6fdc3fd3 |
| SANs: groundedkit.com | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of groundedkit.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | DS published | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| groundedkit.com. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication Inconclusive
We could not reach the endpoint well enough to judge its authorisation posture.
| Result | Inconclusive |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 405 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 3 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://groundedkit.com/mcp | Redirected | 307 | /login |
| streamable-http · followed | https://groundedkit.com/login | HTTP error | 405 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://groundedkit.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://groundedkit.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_stat Check a marketing stat ~153
Paste a marketing or influencer-marketing statistic (a sentence or a whole paragraph), or ask for a reference number (e.g. 'what share of US adults use TikTok'). Returns the best-matching checked claim with its verdict, confidence, primary source, what the source actually says, a safe rephrasing and the claim URL, plus its kind (stat_check or reference_fact), as_of date, last_checked date and stale flag (last checked more than 180 days ago), and close alternatives. Returns match: none when the stat is not in the database.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | string | yes | The statistic as you saw it, e.g. 'influencer marketing returns $5.78 per $1' |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_claim Get one claim ~85
Full record for one checked claim by id (slug) or claim page URL: verdict, confidence, origin, exact quote, method and sample, drift, publisher interest, safe rephrasing and every source we opened.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | Claim id/slug, e.g. 'email-marketing-roi-36-to-1', or its groundedkit.com URL |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_verdicts List verdict types ~41
The four verdicts (verified, misquoted, outdated, unsourced) with definitions and how many claims carry each, plus confidence levels and dataset info.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_claims Search checked claims ~106
Keyword search over all checked marketing statistics (claim text, common phrasing, origin publisher). Optionally filter by verdict. Returns short summaries; get_claim returns the full record for an id.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | Maximum results, 1 to 50 (default 10) |
| query | string | yes | Words or numbers to search for, e.g. 'email ROI' or 'trust influencers'. Empty string lists everything. |
| verdict | string | – | Optional verdict filter |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
verify_text Verify every stat in a draft ~175
Paste a whole draft (up to 20,000 characters: a blog post, deck notes, an email, a social caption). Splits it into sentences, keeps each sentence that contains a number or statistic, and matches each one against the checked claims. Returns one row per statement with the numbers found, the match level, verdict, safe rephrasing and claim URL, or status not_in_database, plus counts by status and verdict. Unmatched statistic text is logged anonymously (date and text only) to guide which stats get checked next.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| max_statements | integer | – | Maximum statements to check, 1 to 60 (default 40) |
| text | string | yes | The draft to check, up to 20,000 characters. Longer input is cut at 20,000 characters and flagged as truncated. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the GroundedKit Marketing Stats Checker MCP server?
GroundedKit Marketing Stats Checker is a hosted endpoint at https://groundedkit.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · groundedkit.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-groundedkit-marketing-stats 'https://groundedkit.com/mcp'
What is the GroundedKit Marketing Stats Checker MCP server?
GroundedKit Marketing Stats Checker is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.groundedkit/marketing-stats. Check marketing and influencer stats against primary sources: verdict, source, safe wording. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://groundedkit.com/mcp).
Is the GroundedKit Marketing Stats Checker MCP server safe to use?
GroundedKit Marketing Stats Checker scores 25 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the GroundedKit Marketing Stats Checker MCP server expose?
GroundedKit Marketing Stats Checker exposes 5 tools: check_stat, verify_text, search_claims, get_claim, list_verdicts. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 560 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the GroundedKit Marketing Stats Checker MCP server require authentication?
Its publisher declares no required credentials for GroundedKit Marketing Stats Checker. We have not been able to confirm that against the live endpoint, and a server can require authorisation without declaring it here.
Is the GroundedKit Marketing Stats Checker MCP server still maintained?
GroundedKit Marketing Stats Checker is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 6 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the GroundedKit Marketing Stats Checker MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 5 checks on GroundedKit Marketing Stats Checker, covering TLS certificate, HTTPS, HSTS header, DNSSEC and 1 more. 6 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about GroundedKit Marketing Stats Checker: Authorization, Schema quality, Stability, Tool coverage and 2 more. 5 categories score 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.