Pathwize
REMOTE · WWW.GOPATHWIZE.COM
Run data annotation and evaluation tasks with vetted domain experts: create, publish, get results.
Available components
Last scanned (16 hours ago)
Scores higher than 61% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 23 Oct 2026.
Category Data and Analytics
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 6 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 1018 tokens (~101/item across 10 items; 10 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management63
- Stability observed for 19 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage81
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 43% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety75
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "publish_task" implies "publish" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
- An AI judge read all 11 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 10 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 23 Oct 2026 · Probed https://www.gopathwize.com/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=www.gopathwize.com | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 30 Aug 2026 | 28 Nov 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 59e5bf069bf70579c127314c2630aad05c8 |
| SANs: www.gopathwize.com | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of www.gopathwize.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| gopathwize.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(self), microphone=(self), geolocation=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.gopathwize.com/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.gopathwize.com/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://www.gopathwize.com/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
add_items Add items to an AI task ~80
Add items by public URL; Pathwize copies the files into its own storage. reference: true adds them to the qualification set (optionally with gold_label for automatic scoring). Idempotent per id, up to 1000 per call.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| items | array | yes | – |
| reference | boolean | – | – |
| taskId | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
close_task Close or pause an AI task ~37
closed ends the task, draft pauses it. Experts are not emailed.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| status | string | – | – |
| taskId | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
create_task Create an AI task (draft) ~304
Create a labeling or evaluation task as a draft; nobody is notified until publish_task. Typical order: list_pools, create_task with instructions, classes, rate, pool_ids and one example image per class, add_items, then publish_task after the user confirms.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| allow_cant_tell | boolean | – | Let experts skip an item without a class (default true) |
| allow_note | boolean | – | – |
| annotation | string | – | Default classification |
| classes | array | – | Class names experts choose from |
| deadline | string | – | – |
| domain | string | – | – |
| examples | array | – | Example images by public URL with the class they show. Labeling tasks need one per class before they can open. |
| expertise | string | – | What experts need to know, one line |
| instructions | string | – | Instructions for the experts in Markdown. A table whose first column names the classes becomes the per-class briefing. |
| language | string | – | Language of the instructions |
| members_only | boolean | – | Only members of these pools see the task, even on public pools |
| multi_select | boolean | – | – |
| pool_ids | array | – | Pools the task runs on (see list_pools) |
| qualification | object | – | – |
| rate | number | – | Hourly pay for the expert in EUR |
| seconds_per_item | integer | – | – |
| title | string | yes | – |
| type | string | – | Default data_labeling |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_results Get labeled results ~60
Finished items with final label, agreement, notes and flags. Page with starting_after (the last item id).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| since | string | – | – |
| starting_after | string | – | – |
| taskId | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_task Get an AI task ~36
One task with settings, classes, examples, qualification, reference item count and item counts by status.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| taskId | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_pools List expert pools ~27
Pools a task can run on: active curated pools plus your own, with member counts.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_tasks List AI tasks ~21
Your AI tasks, newest first, with status and item counts.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
open_dashboard Open the business dashboard, signed in ~51
One-time link that opens the Pathwize business dashboard signed in as this business (optionally one task). Single use, one hour; give it only to the user.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| taskId | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
publish_task Publish an AI task ~68
Open a task for experts. This emails every expert in the task's pools once and cannot be undone, so call it only after the user explicitly confirmed, with confirm: true. Fails with a list of anything missing.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| confirm | boolean | yes | – |
| taskId | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
update_task Update an AI task ~269
Change a task's settings; only the fields you pass change, examples are added. Does not publish.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| allow_cant_tell | boolean | – | Let experts skip an item without a class (default true) |
| allow_note | boolean | – | – |
| annotation | string | – | Default classification |
| classes | array | – | Class names experts choose from |
| deadline | string | – | – |
| domain | string | – | – |
| examples | array | – | Example images by public URL with the class they show. Labeling tasks need one per class before they can open. |
| expertise | string | – | What experts need to know, one line |
| instructions | string | – | Instructions for the experts in Markdown. A table whose first column names the classes becomes the per-class briefing. |
| language | string | – | Language of the instructions |
| members_only | boolean | – | Only members of these pools see the task, even on public pools |
| multi_select | boolean | – | – |
| pool_ids | array | – | Pools the task runs on (see list_pools) |
| qualification | object | – | – |
| rate | number | – | Hourly pay for the expert in EUR |
| seconds_per_item | integer | – | – |
| taskId | string | yes | – |
| title | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Pathwize MCP server?
Pathwize is a hosted endpoint at https://www.gopathwize.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.gopathwize.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-gopathwize-pathwize 'https://www.gopathwize.com/api/mcp'
What is the Pathwize MCP server?
Pathwize is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.gopathwize/pathwize. Run data annotation and evaluation tasks with vetted domain experts: create, publish, get results. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.gopathwize.com/api/mcp).
Is the Pathwize MCP server safe to use?
Pathwize scores 71 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Pathwize MCP server expose?
Pathwize exposes 10 tools: list_pools, list_tasks, get_task, create_task, update_task, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 953 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Pathwize MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Pathwize without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Pathwize MCP server still maintained?
Pathwize is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 23 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.