FxLayer
REMOTE · FXLAYERHQ.COM
Indian FEMA compliance: RBI purpose codes, EDPMS / IDPMS, Form 145 / 146 and export deadlines
Available components
Last scanned (6 hours ago)
Scores higher than 91% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security83
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability81
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 3288 tokens (~91/item across 36 items; 8 tools + 28 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management70
- Stability observed for 21 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage89
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 67% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 10 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 0
- Tool “export_realisation_deadline” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 25 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://fxlayerhq.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=fxlayerhq.com | CN=WR3,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 25 Oct 2026 | 23 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | b8fd98a2d3cd2b310a12c91dd73ae487 |
| SANs: fxlayerhq.com, www.fxlayerhq.com | ||||||
| CN=WR3,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 7ff005a91568d63abc22861684aa4b5a |
| CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 19 Jun 2020 | 28 Jan 2028 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d |
| CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 1 Sept 1998 | 28 Jan 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA1-RSA | 40000000001154b5ac394 |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of fxlayerhq.com. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| fxlayerhq.com. | present | 17658, 21945 | 13, 13 | Verified |
| fxlayerhq.com. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jszip/3.10.1/jszip.min.js https://checkout.razorpay.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; font-src 'self' data:; img-src 'self' data: blob: https://cdn.razorpay.com; connect-src 'self' https://api.razorpay.com https://lumberjack.razorpay.com https://localhost.emudhra.com:26769; frame-src 'self' blob: data: https://api.razorpay.com https://checkout.razorpay.com https://www.youtube-nocookie.com; worker-src 'self' blob:; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), payment=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://fxlayerhq.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://fxlayerhq.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://fxlayerhq.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
about_fxlayer About FxLayer ~31
What FxLayer is, its modules, plans with starting prices, and where to sign up or read more.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
export_realisation_deadline Export realisation deadline ~109
The last day to realise and repatriate an export's proceeds under FEMA (for exports from 1 October 2026, nine months from the date of export, or twelve when invoiced or settled in rupees), with the rule and its source.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| currency | string | – | Invoice currency, e.g. USD or INR. |
| export_date | string | yes | Shipping Bill date (goods) or invoice date (services), YYYY-MM-DD. |
| kind | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
fetch Read a guide or a purpose-code page ~55
The full text (Markdown) of a guide or a purpose-code page, by the id `search` returned (guide:<slug>, code:<code>) or by its address on fxlayerhq.com.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find_purpose_codes Find the RBI purpose code for a payment ~114
RBI purpose codes that fit a payment or receipt described in plain words, best first, each with its bank form (Form A1 / A2), Form 145 / 146, income-tax nature, GST and reporting.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| direction | string | – | inward = money received from abroad (P codes), outward = money paid abroad (S codes), any = both. |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | What the money is for, e.g. 'software development for a US client'. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_purpose_code One RBI purpose code in full ~78
One RBI purpose code (e.g. P0802, S1006) with the reasoning: which bank form, income-tax nature and Form 145 / 146 part, GST, reporting, cautions and the matching code for the other direction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| code | string | yes | e.g. P0802 or S0802 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
regulatory_updates Recent RBI, FEMA and tax changes ~62
The RBI / FEMA / income-tax / GST changes FxLayer follows: the rule, when it takes effect, its source and what changed in FxLayer. Newest first.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | – | Optional words to filter by. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search Search FxLayer's guides and purpose codes ~65
Search FxLayer's compliance guides and the RBI purpose-code reference with plain words (for example 'EDPMS entry not closed', 'Form 145 Part C', 'software export purpose code'). Returns ids for `fetch`.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | Plain words or a purpose code. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
services_edf_due_date Monthly services EDF due date ~63
When the monthly EDF for a services export invoice is due (30 days from the end of the month of invoicing, for invoices from 1 October 2026), with the rule and its source.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| invoice_date | string | yes | YYYY-MM-DD |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the FxLayer MCP server?
FxLayer is a hosted endpoint at https://fxlayerhq.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · fxlayerhq.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-fxlayerhq-fxlayer 'https://fxlayerhq.com/mcp'
What is the FxLayer MCP server?
FxLayer is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.fxlayerhq/fxlayer. Indian FEMA compliance: RBI purpose codes, EDPMS / IDPMS, Form 145 / 146 and export deadlines. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://fxlayerhq.com/mcp).
Is the FxLayer MCP server safe to use?
FxLayer scores 85 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the FxLayer MCP server expose?
FxLayer exposes 8 tools: search, fetch, find_purpose_codes, get_purpose_code, export_realisation_deadline, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 577 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the FxLayer MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to FxLayer without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the FxLayer MCP server still maintained?
FxLayer is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.