The Front Desk Review
REMOTE · MCP.FRONTDESKREVIEW.COM · SCANNED SEP 25
4,764 products, 626 categories: sourced prices, dated price history, independent-test coverage.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 19 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability70
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 3163 tokens (~166/item across 19 items; 19 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage94
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 83% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 19 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 19 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the The Front Desk Review MCP server?
The Front Desk Review is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.frontdeskreview.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.frontdeskreview.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-frontdeskreview-front-desk-review-data 'https://mcp.frontdeskreview.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-frontdeskreview-front-desk-review-data": {
"url": "https://mcp.frontdeskreview.com/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"com-frontdeskreview-front-desk-review-data": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.frontdeskreview.com/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.com-frontdeskreview-front-desk-review-data] url = "https://mcp.frontdeskreview.com/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"com-frontdeskreview-front-desk-review-data": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://mcp.frontdeskreview.com/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add com-frontdeskreview-front-desk-review-data --url 'https://mcp.frontdeskreview.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
com-frontdeskreview-front-desk-review-data:
url: "https://mcp.frontdeskreview.com/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"com-frontdeskreview-front-desk-review-data": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://mcp.frontdeskreview.com/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add com-frontdeskreview-front-desk-review-data -t streamable-http -u 'https://mcp.frontdeskreview.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-frontdeskreview-front-desk-review-data": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.frontdeskreview.com/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 11 Sept 26 0
- Tool “list_coverage” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “list_sections” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- “compare” reworded the description of “section” cosmetic
- “find_best” reworded the description of “section” cosmetic
- “get_benchmark” reworded the description of “section” cosmetic
- “get_normalized_pricing” reworded the description of “section” cosmetic
- “search_vendors” reworded the description of “section” cosmetic
- “whats_changed” reworded the description of “section” cosmetic
- 8 Sept 26 0
- Tool “whats_changed” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Server version: 1.2.0 → 1.2.1 functional
- 5 Sept 26 0
- Tool “list_coverage” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “list_sections” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- “compare” reworded the description of “section” cosmetic
- “find_best” reworded the description of “section” cosmetic
- “get_benchmark” reworded the description of “section” cosmetic
- “get_normalized_pricing” reworded the description of “section” cosmetic
- “search_vendors” reworded the description of “section” cosmetic
- “whats_changed” reworded the description of “section” cosmetic
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Aug 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 31 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 25 Sept 2026 · Probed https://mcp.frontdeskreview.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=frontdeskreview.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 20 Aug 2026 | 18 Nov 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 97bb9795f8a9f9c91337a22dabed17c3 |
| SANs: frontdeskreview.com, *.frontdeskreview.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of mcp.frontdeskreview.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| frontdeskreview.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.frontdeskreview.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.frontdeskreview.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 302 | https://mcp.frontdeskreview.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare Compare vendors ~173
Compare specific vendors side by side by slug within any theme (e.g. ['goodcall','rosie','smith-ai'] in ai-receptionists, or ['nordvpn','expressvpn'] in vpn-services). Set `section` to the theme slug from list_sections. Returns full provenanced records plus a notFound list for unknown slugs.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| section | string | – | Theme slug to query (default "ai-receptionists"). A theme is any of the 275 pricing topics this index covers: the deep hub sections (e.g. ai-receptionists) plus the many catalog topics (e.g. vpn-serv… |
| slugs | array | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
compare_products Compare products ~99
Compare specific products side by side by slug within a category (e.g. ['apple-iphone-16-pro','samsung-galaxy-s25-ultra'] in 'smartphones'). Returns full provenanced spec records plus a notFound list and the category's comparable specKeys, so an agent can line up the same attributes across products.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | yes | Product category slug from list_product_categories. |
| slugs | array | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find_best Find best (ranked) ~329
Answer 'best <theme> for <use case>' and 'cheapest <theme>' directly: returns the theme's vendors ranked by entry price (cheapest first, quote-only last), each with its verified compliance facts (HIPAA/SOC 2/GDPR), free-tier flag, best-for tags and the entry plan's source. Conjunctive fact filters narrow it to what this index has actually CONFIRMED — requireHipaa / requireSoc2 / requireGdpr / requireFreeTier (e.g. 'best CRM for HIPAA' = section 'crm-software' + requireHipaa:true). Omit all filters to rank the whole theme by price. Set `section` to the theme slug from list_sections. Never infers a fact it has not verified.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| requireFreeTier | boolean | – | Only vendors with a genuine $0 forever plan. |
| requireGdpr | boolean | – | Only vendors with confirmed GDPR compliance. |
| requireHipaa | boolean | – | Only vendors with confirmed HIPAA support (a BAA). |
| requireSoc2 | boolean | – | Only vendors with a confirmed SOC 2 attestation. |
| section | string | – | Theme slug to query (default "ai-receptionists"). A theme is any of the 275 pricing topics this index covers: the deep hub sections (e.g. ai-receptionists) plus the many catalog topics (e.g. vpn-serv… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find_products Find products (ranked) ~211
Answer 'best <category> under $N' and 'which <category> has the most <spec>' directly: filter a category by maxPriceUsd and/or brand, then rank by a field — 'priceUsd' (default, cheapest first), 'releaseDate', or any of the category's spec keys (set descending:true for biggest-first, e.g. sortBy:'battery_mah' descending:true). Returns provenanced product records; products missing the sort value sort last. Never infers a spec it has not verified.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| brand | string | – | Only products from this brand. |
| category | string | yes | Product category slug from list_product_categories. |
| descending | boolean | – | Rank largest/newest first (default false = smallest/cheapest first). |
| maxPriceUsd | number | – | Only products at or below this USD price. |
| sortBy | string | – | Field to rank by: 'priceUsd' (default), 'releaseDate', or a spec key from the category. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_benchmark Get vendor benchmark ~176
Per-vendor benchmark card by slug within any theme: full provenanced record plus dataset-derived indicators (entry price, normalized cost at 100 and 500 calls/mo where call-volume applies, billing models, free-tier presence, compliance, integration breadth). Set `section` to the theme slug from list_sections. All values trace to plan sources; no synthetic scores.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| section | string | – | Theme slug to query (default "ai-receptionists"). A theme is any of the 275 pricing topics this index covers: the deep hub sections (e.g. ai-receptionists) plus the many catalog topics (e.g. vpn-serv… |
| slug | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_cost_decoder Get cost decoder ~199
The REAL all-in monthly cost per vendor for a decoder topic (slug from list_cost_decoders, e.g. 'ai-customer-support-cost'), computed in deterministic code from sourced, dated inputs — each vendor's per-seat price + AI billing model + per-unit price, totalled at named scenarios (e.g. 5 agents at 1,000 and 5,000 AI resolutions/mo) with the arithmetic shown. Quote-only inputs return a null total, never a fabricated number. Optionally pass agents + resolutions for a custom scenario. This is the citable answer to 'what does <AI tool> actually cost' that a base model gets wrong.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agents | number | – | Optional: agents/seats for a custom scenario. |
| resolutions | number | – | Optional: AI resolutions/mo for a custom scenario. |
| topic | string | yes | Decoder slug from list_cost_decoders (e.g. 'ai-customer-support-cost'). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_independent_test_coverage Get independent test coverage ~203
The independent-testing provenance for ONE product (by category + slug) — a COUNT of evidence, never a quality score. Fields: outlets (independent outlets on record), labs (how many physically tested it and left >=1 measured value), metrics (distinct kinds of metric measured, with names), mentioned (outlets that only mentioned it), and a ready-to-quote `reading` sentence. Use it to state how much independent hands-on evidence backs any claim about a product. A low count means little independent evidence has been gathered yet, NOT that the product is bad; a high count means well-documented, NOT better. Returns found:false (never a fabricated count) for an unknown or unreviewed product.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | yes | Product category slug (e.g. 'action-cameras', '3d-printers'). |
| slug | string | yes | Product slug (e.g. 'dji-osmo-action-5-pro'). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_normalized_pricing Get normalized pricing ~217
Effective monthly cost per vendor in any theme at a chosen call volume, normalizing flat, per-minute and per-call billing to one comparable number. For non-telephony catalog themes (per-seat / flat plans with no call quota) this returns each plan's base monthly price — the meaningful figure there. Cheapest priceable plan per vendor; quote-only or unpriceable-at-volume vendors return null (never a fabricated figure). avgCallMinutes defaults to 3 and is echoed in assumptions for reproducibility.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| avgCallMinutes | number | – | – |
| callsPerMonth | number | yes | – |
| section | string | – | Theme slug to query (default "ai-receptionists"). A theme is any of the 275 pricing topics this index covers: the deep hub sections (e.g. ai-receptionists) plus the many catalog topics (e.g. vpn-serv… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_price_history Get price history ~175
The full dated price series for ONE product or vendor (by slug), plus derived stats: first-tracked date, current/low/high, number of recorded changes, net % since tracked, the largest single move, and the last change. This is the citable answer to 'how much did X cost', 'did X's price drop', and price-trend questions — grounded on a real, append-only series, not a model's guess. Returns found:false (never a fabricated series) for an unknown slug.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| kind | string | – | Limit to 'hw' (hardware product) or 'sw' (software vendor). Omit to match either; a slug is resolved across both. |
| slug | string | yes | Product or vendor slug (e.g. 'bambu-lab-a1', 'goodcall'). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_cost_decoders List cost decoders ~86
List the 'real cost' decoders — topics where the advertised sticker price hides the true bill (e.g. AI customer support billed per resolution, where a $29/mo seat price becomes hundreds/mo at volume). Each entry carries the question it answers, the scenarios it computes, the vendor count and the data's as-of date. Pass a topic slug to get_cost_decoder.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_coverage List coverage ~115
What this index actually covers, so a miss reads as out-of-scope rather than broken. Now spans 275 pricing themes — the deep hub sections PLUS dozens of catalog topics (VPNs, web hosting, password managers, CRM, e-commerce, AI tools, and more): total theme count, the section/catalog split, total vendors, per-theme vendor counts and kind, the data's date range (min/max source accessedAt), the questions it answers well and what it does NOT cover. Derived from every theme's dataset.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_product_categories List product categories ~71
Enumerate the spec-driven PRODUCT categories this index covers (physical goods like smartphones, laptops, GPUs — distinct from the software/subscription pricing themes). Each entry carries its slug, product count, the comparable spec keys, and the brands present. Pass a category slug to search_products / compare_products / find_products.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_sections List sections ~105
Enumerate ALL 275 pricing themes this index covers: the deep hub sections (e.g. ai-receptionists, call-tracking) plus dozens of catalog topics (e.g. vpn-services, web-hosting, password-managers, crm-software). Each entry carries its slug, display label, vertical, tagline, vendor count and kind ('section' or 'catalog'). Pass any of these slugs as the `section` arg to the other tools to query that theme.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
most_volatile_in_category Most volatile in category ~145
Within one category/theme, the entities whose prices have moved the most (ranked by volatility score), plus the category price baseline (count, median current, low/high). Entities without enough recorded movement are omitted from the ranking but counted in the baseline. Answers 'which X changes price most' for a market.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | yes | Category/theme slug (e.g. 'gpus', 'crm-software'). |
| kind | string | – | Limit to 'hw' (hardware product) or 'sw' (software vendor). Omit to match either; a slug is resolved across both. |
| limit | integer | – | Max ranked entities (default 25). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
price_movers Price movers ~197
Recorded price MOVES across the index within a recency window (default 90 days), newest-and-largest first — each a dated before→after change of a tracked entity. Optionally filter by kind ('hw'/'sw') or category/theme slug. The freshness a base model structurally cannot have. Returns an empty list with a clear note when nothing moved in the window (a quiet window is honestly quiet).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Limit to one category/theme slug (e.g. '3d-printers', 'ai-receptionists'). |
| kind | string | – | Limit to 'hw' (hardware product) or 'sw' (software vendor). Omit to match either; a slug is resolved across both. |
| limit | integer | – | Max movers to return (default 25). |
| withinDays | integer | – | Recency window in days (default 90), measured against the log's latest date. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_products Search products ~110
Search one product category by free-text query across product name, brand, and spec values (e.g. 'snapdragon 5000mah', 'oled 120hz'). Set `category` to a slug from list_product_categories. Returns full provenanced product records (every spec + price carries source url + accessedAt). Empty query returns all products in the category.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | yes | Product category slug from list_product_categories (e.g. 'smartphones'). |
| query | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_vendors Search vendors ~190
Search any theme's data index by free-text query across vendor name, domain, integrations, plan notes, and capabilities (e.g. 'hipaa restaurant', 'google ads zapier'). Works for every theme — hub sections and catalog topics alike (set `section` to the theme slug from list_sections). Returns full provenanced vendor records (each plan carries source url + accessedAt). Empty query returns all vendors in the theme.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | – | – |
| section | string | – | Theme slug to query (default "ai-receptionists"). A theme is any of the 275 pricing topics this index covers: the deep hub sections (e.g. ai-receptionists) plus the many catalog topics (e.g. vpn-serv… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
volatility_for_entity Volatility for entity ~122
How volatile ONE product or vendor's price has been: a 0-100 volatility score derived from its recorded moves (frequency × average move size), plus change count, net % and last change. Honest gate: below a minimum recorded-change threshold it returns sufficient:false with a note, never a score invented from a single point.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| kind | string | – | Limit to 'hw' (hardware product) or 'sw' (software vendor). Omit to match either; a slug is resolved across both. |
| slug | string | yes | Product or vendor slug. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
whats_changed What's changed ~240
Recent dated price-change capsules, newest first — the freshness a base model cannot have. Each capsule is a movement of a vendor's published price (vendor, plan, before→after, date, sources), cleared against two witnesses on two different hosts: the page the figure was read from, plus either an independent second source or a dated archive capture of that same page — and when the archive is the only second witness, that first page must be the vendor's own. Optionally filter to changes on/after a date or within one section. Returns an empty list with a clear note when nothing qualifying has been recorded yet.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| section | string | – | Theme slug to query (default "ai-receptionists"). A theme is any of the 275 pricing topics this index covers: the deep hub sections (e.g. ai-receptionists) plus the many catalog topics (e.g. vpn-serv… |
| since | string | – | Only changes detected on or after this ISO date (YYYY-MM-DD). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the The Front Desk Review MCP server?
The Front Desk Review is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.frontdeskreview/front-desk-review-data. 4,764 products, 626 categories: sourced prices, dated price history, independent-test coverage. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.frontdeskreview.com/mcp).
Is the The Front Desk Review MCP server safe to use?
The Front Desk Review scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the The Front Desk Review MCP server expose?
The Front Desk Review exposes 19 tools: list_sections, search_vendors, compare, get_normalized_pricing, get_benchmark, and 14 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 3,163 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the The Front Desk Review MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to The Front Desk Review without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the The Front Desk Review MCP server still maintained?
The Front Desk Review is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 25 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.